NEWS FROM UNDERGROUND

Thousands of Canadian Aviation Professionals Join Hub for Pilots and Passengers Against Mandatory Vaccines

by Dan Dicks, Press for Truth
November 5, 2021

https://truthcomestolight.com/thousands-of-canadian-aviation-professionals-join-hub-for-pilots-and-passengers-against-mandatory-vaccines/

Free To Fly is a group of more than 2,500 aviation professionals along with over 35,000 passengers who’s goal is: “To unite people through one of the most cherished freedoms of modern civilization – the freedom to travel great distances safely, quickly, and in comfort.” 

In 2021 the Covid-19(84) nightmare took a turn for the worst when vaccines became mandatory for travel in Canada leaving many to feel like prisoners in their own country. Many pilots are now loosing their jobs because they refuse to be coerced into getting the experimental mRNA shot. Free2Fly was created by former pilots who’s lives have been changed forever due to Covid-19(84). 

In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth speaks with the founders of Free2Fly Matt Sattler and Greg Hill about the organization they’ve created, who’s involved, what their aspirations are and most importantly what you as an individual can do to help gain back your right to travel unmolested by the government. 

 Click on the link for the video.

Begin forwarded message:From:Daniela Danna <daniela.danna@unimi.it>Date:November 7, 2021 at 8:24:53 AM PSTTo:ASA_PEWS@lists.ucr.eduSubject:[ASA_PEWS] Appeal against the Italian Green Pass

Dear PEWS members,

some hundreds of Italian professors and researchers have mobilized against the obligation to carry a Green Pass in universities, an obligation from 1st September that has been extended since 15th October to all workplaces, private and public. There is a mobilization going on, defamed as being “fascist”, and obscuring the fascistic character of the green pass requirement. We have already lived such an historical period, where the required document was the card attesting belonging to the Fascist Party. So we have translated the Italian declaration, asking colleagues from abroad to subscribe it.

This is the text:

International support of university teachers and intellectuals for the “no green pass” appeal in Italy  

To the President of the Italian Republic    

To the Speaker of the Chamber of Deputies of the Italian Republic

To the Speaker of the Senate of the Italian Republic

To the Prime Minister of the Italian Republic    

To the Minister of Education of the Italian Government

To the Minister of Universities and Scientific Research of the Italian Government   

To the President of the Conference of Italian University Chancellors – CRUI    

As university teachers and intellectuals,    

We are extremely concerned about the way the current pandemic emergency has been handled  , and about the consequences it has already had, and could have in the future, for the Italian people, starting with the world of universities and schools.  

 We are particularly concerned about academic freedom, which is a pillar of the rule of law and an expression of the highest human dignity. Academic freedom means the freedom to teach, study and learn without any kind of interference or conditioning.

 The handling of the emergency has led many European governments to introduce a health pass (or so-called “Green Pass”) for many activities (although the situation varies widely from state to state).  

 Like many of our Italian colleagues, some of us have freely chosen to be vaccinated against Covid-19.   All of us, however, consider the social discrimination introduced with the Green Pass, which restricts many fundamental human rights, to be unjust and illegitimate.  The population is thus divided between upper-tier citizens, who possess a pass and can access basic services (transport, healthcare, catering, etc.) and lower-tier citizens, who do not have a pass.   

 In Italy, unlike in all other European countries, the Green Pass has been extended to schools and universities.   As a result, students not in possession of a Green Pass are refused access to university facilities (classrooms, canteen, library, etc.): in short, they are denied the right to study. Likewise, teachers without a pass are suspended from teaching duties and receive no salary. This troubles and worries us enormously!    

The word “university” comes from universitas, from vertere in unum: “turning into one”, which means welcoming the plurality of knowledge, but also the multiple bonds that are created between people. Under an medieval, noble rule promulgated in Italy, the Authentica Habita, university teaching staff and students were granted a series of specific rights in terms of hospitality, immunity, protection, freedom, and movement. These achievements of about 900 years ago became a civil and cultural reference in other areas of society. Precisely for this reason, discrimination in Italian universities, a beacon of civilization for many, acquires a dangerous symbolic value for all of us.  

 As a result of the Green Pass, Italian universities are no longer free and welcoming   for everyone, nor are they forums for free thought and discussion. With the adoption of the Green Pass, universities become a government tool aimed at inducing teachers and young people to get vaccinated. The Green Pass in fact encourages them to sacrifice their ideas and intellectual freedom, as well as to abandon critical thinking. Universities are thus disowning their fundamental values and principles, and undermining their objectives.    

We are shocked that most of academic bodies – as far as we know – allow such discrimination, which also translates into socio-economic discrimination, if we consider that those students who cannot or do not wish to be vaccinated, but who intend to follow lessons in person (as they are entitled to), will have to sustain monthly Covid-19 test costs of about €200. It is clear that only students from well-off families will be able to afford the “luxury” of the right to education!

For these reasons, we agree with the appeal made by Italian university teachers against the Green Pass, and firmly support the teachers, administrative staff and students engaged in this battle of civil rights. We hope that this discriminatory mechanism will be abolished as soon as possible.    

To sign the petition, send an email with your title to Daniela Poli <zazadig@gmail.com>  

First subscribers:

Antoine Brès   professeur associé en aménagement et urbanisme, HDR, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (France)   

Pietro Elia Campana   , Associate Professor, Mälardalen University (Sweden)  

David Vera Candeas   ,   Associate Professor, University of Jaén (Spain)     

Francesca Capelli,    Associata di Grammatica Italiana, Università del Salvador – Buenos Aires (Argentina)  

Guillaume Faburel,    Professeur en Science Politique  – Université Lumière Lyon 2, et Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne (France)  

Francesco Gervasi,    Profesor Investigador de Tiempo Completo Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Facultad de Ciencias de la Comunicación, Coahuila de Zaragoza (México)   

Ashwani Gupta   , Distinguished University Professor, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland (MD), (USA)   

Simon Harvey   , Professor of Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden   

Daniele Joly,    Professor Emeritus, Department of Sociology, University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL (UK), CADIS-EHESS, College d’etudes mondiales FMSH  Paris (France)   

Valérie JOUSSEAUME,    Maîtresse de conférences   en géographie de l’aménagement,    HDR, Université de Nantes (France)

 Francisco Jurado   , Full Professor, University of Jaen (Spain)

 Markus Kraft,    Fellow of Churchill College and Full Professor, University of Cambridge (UK)  

Antonio Lecuona-Neumann,    Full Professor,  Universidad Carlos III de Madrid,   (España)    

María Pilar LISBONA-MARTÍN   , Associate Professor, Universidad de Zaragoza, (España)    

Béatrice Mariolle,    professeure en architecture et urbanisme, École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture et de Paysage de Lille    

Alberto Matarán Ruiz   , Profesor  of Urban and Spatial Planning España(https://www.ugr.es/en/about/organization/entities/department-urban-and-spatial-planning” Universidad de Granada

Rebeca    Merino del Río    , Ricercatrice a tempo determinato , Universidad de Sevilla (España)     

Jaroslaw Milewski   ,Full professor Politechnika Warszawska (Politecnico di Varsavia)    

Robert Olinski,    M.Sc., PhD, Senior Scientist head of genomics team at Novozymes A/S headquarters (Denmark)  

Thierry Paquot   , professeur émérite à l’Institut d’urbanisme de Paris – université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne (France)

Carlos Plaza    Ricercatore a contrato , Universidad de Sevilla (España)     

Sergio Porta   , Professor of Urban Design, Department of Architecture, University of StrathclydeDirector of UDSU – Urban Design Studies Unit, Course Director MSc in Urban Design, Glasgow (UK)

ASA_PEWS mailing list ASA_PEWS@lists.ucr.eduhttps://lists.ucr.edu/mailman/listinfo/asa_pews

FDA-Disinformation-Ivemectin.pdf 

Please think about that, hard.

What this country very badly needs is revolution; and “the left” will not be leading it—or, if it should succeed, surviving it.

Someone call Joe Rogan. (I’ll gladly do his show on this.)

MCM

There’s a distinctly USSR feeling about Gavin Newsome’s sudden disappearance from the scene, the official silence over it, and the masses guessing what may have happened to him. 

Could it be, as Alex Berenson implies, that the governor accidentally got the sort of “booster” ordinarily used to finish off, like, old people, denizens of “red” states and other vermin? (Those eugenic details are my own, not Berenson’s.) Or maybe Newsome was sidelined, or felled, by such a shot on purpose, in furtherance of yet another dark agenda?

Who knows? We sure don’t. Such is life in COVID Country.  

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/wheres-gavin-newsom/comments

Where’s Gavin Newsom? Alex BerensonNov 51,301 Governor White Teeth was last seen eight days ago getting his Covid booster shot. He was supposed to go to Scotland for the “how do we get heating oil to $10 a gallon to show the peasants who’s in charge?” conference, I mean the United Nations climate summit. (No points for guessing if he planned to fly private.) But he didn’t go to Scotland. Something about “family obligations.” Dude hasn’t been seen since. Those are some serious obligations! I’m sure he’s fine. I’m sure it has nothing to do with the booster. SOURCE: https://abc7.com/gavin-newsom-california-governor-newson-family-obligations-today/11202905/

We hear way too much about “the virus”—all of it false, and therefore dangerous—and, as well, about the Next Big Existential, said to be “climate change”; while we hear nothing about all the radiation from our cell phones, and the cellphone towers surrounding most of us—and that silence too is dangerous.

So here is a corrective. As you’ll see below, you won’t hear much more than this, unless you go in search of it, since scientists cannot find funding for studies of 5G, or even 4G (just as there’s no funding for the impact of Fukushima).

MCM

Health Effects of Cellphone & Cell Tower Radiation: Implications for 5G
Nov. 3, 2021

Notes on Q&A by Dylan Harnett

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-_8PvG753A&t=4872s with Joel Moskowitz, PhD, Director of Center for Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

Moskowitz received over 100 questions during the Q&A, and he was not able to get to my question about whether shungite protects against EMF. Here is one argument for shungite with citations of studies, and here is one argument against it. 

Some of my notes:

• Dr. Moskowitz recommended the site saferemer.com for safety tips regarding technology and health. Minimize use of the tech; keep as much physical distance from your devices as you can;  use speaker phone for calls; don’t use a device when the reception is poor; and turn off WiFi router and wireless connections whenever you can, or, better yet, use wired connections.
• Since 2001, electromagnetic radiation/EMF, which emits from phones and other devices, has been considered “possibly carcinogenic” by the WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer.
• Among 944 studies from 1990 to 2020, significant negative effects of wireless radiation on health were found in 711, or 75%, of studies. Meta-analyses have similar findings.
• The FCC’s regulations on EMF are not designed to protect against long-term effects of constant exposure. 
• The amount of money spent by the telecom industry to lobby politicians is at a comparable level to the money spent by the oil & gas industry: https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/industries/summary?cycle=2021&id=B09
• According to Dr. Moskowitz, scientists at the CDC published a warning about cellphone risks on the CDC’s website, but the warning was taken down at the behest of industry-funded scientists. The alleged archive of the original warning can be found here. The New York Times reported on the CDC’s “debate” over these risks in 2016. 
• It’s nearly impossible to get funding to study the health effects of 5G. No peer-reviewed studies on 5G have been published. There are not even many studies on 4G. 
• The media reports the government’s narrative without scrutiny. It’s the Big Tobacco playbook. 
• Relevant petitions include the EMF Scientist Appeal and the 5G Appeal.
• Organizations working to check the telecom industry include the Environmental Health Trust, which sued the FCC and won; Physicians for Safe Technology; and Americans for Responsible Technology. 

As some of you know, for the last few years I have been helping Amal Arafa, a young woman in Gaza, raise funds to keep her group of nurses working to treat people injured under Israel’s bombardment. She has sent me many harrowing photos of the carnage on the ground, which I have shared via NFU. 

Now that mode of overt attack by Israel has given way to a less explosive and yet even more destructive policy of economic strangulation—and the impact of that suffocation has been worsened by a “vaccination” mandate like the one imposed by the Israeli government, in partnership with Pfizer, on the Israeli people.

The situation over there defies belief, and calm description: Israel’s Jewish government has partnered with a corporate pharmaceutical behemoth to carry out a mammoth, endless forcible experiment on Israel’s Jews (and Arabs), mandating their injection with an only nominally tested gene-editing elixir that has killed or injured thousands more Israelis than COVID-19 did (reportedly). As I am not the only one to say, it’s as if Dr. Mengele were running Israel, with the same eugenic zeal and sadistic pseudo-scientific passion that he indulged at Auschwitz.

Meanwhile, Israel has never ceased its punitive confinement, and periodic bombing, of the Palestinians in Gaza; and now, as if in furtherance of the general strangulation there, the government that has been poisoning its own people is also poisoning those Palestinians, by allowing no travel outside Gaza, permits of any kind, inclusion in work projects, or any other “privilege” without proof of “vaccination.” And, just as the Israeli government is mandating “vaccination” for Israel’s entire population, the Palestinian Authority is also making its
services contingent on “vaccination,” so that the wretched people stuck in that immense de facto prison camp are, increasingly, nudged toward the needle by the authorities on either side.

Now, when Amal told me, a few months ago, that she was going to have to get injected so that her husband, Ibrahim, could collect his monthly $100 from the Qatari government, which provides financial aid to unemployed youth in Gaza, I begged her not to do it, or let him do it, and promised to pay them that amount if they would keep themselves unjabbed (and not have any of their three children “vaccinated”). Now that they know how dangerous it is (I’ve given her the crucial information), they won’t get “vaccinated”—unlike nearly everyone they know, since, Amal tells me, the authorities in Gaza “have made people feel that vaccination is normal.”

Amal and Ibrahim’s resistance to the jabs has come at a tremendous cost: “From the time of the vaccine, we have been subjected to the worst treatment and the worst conditions,” she writes. Neither of them is allowed to work without proof of “vaccination.” Israel has a work project for the unemployed—building houses for Israelis. Ibrahim cannot take even that humiliating job without proof of “vaccination.” Amal had tried to start a little business manufacturing detergent—but now she cannot buy the necessary supplies without proof of “vaccination.” Neither of them can leave Gaza without proof of “vaccination,” so that Ibrahim has been unable to collect that stipend from the Qatari government. Nor can they even take their children to the hospital, since treatment there requires proof of “vaccination,” so they must see a private doctor, whose services are very costly. (Nada, 6, suffers from a deviation of the cornea, and Khaled, 5, is severely hearing-impaired.)

In short, the family is barely scraping by; and so I send you this account of their ordeal in hopes that you can help them out with a donation, so that they can stay “unvaccinated” without starving, or foregoing necessary medical attention. While Jewish Voice for Peace, Noam Chomsky, Amy Goodman, and other  “leftists” call, psychotically, for greater “vaccine equity,”  so that the Palestinians (along with every other Third World people) might have “greater access” to those lethal shots, those of us who aren’t enchanted by the COVID propaganda, and who really care about the Palestinians (and all the other peoples of the world) must step up now, to help those who will not getjabbed.

Donations for Amal’s family may be sent, via PayPal, to Mhamad Orooq @mrooq21.

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/mrooq21

MCM

Screenplay / Script for short Richplanet film

I am intending to produce a short film (around 10 minutes), which will illustrate how peoples lives might change after the introduction of the new monetary system which is currently being planned by the banking system.

I have tried to explain in previous Richplanet episodes, the dangers of ‘programmable’ money, and tried to explain that once it is introduced, could easily bring about the end of human freedom. Because this is such a serious issue and because it has the capacity to turn human beings,literally into slaves, I think people need to be shown what the world could become like after programmable money is introduced, rather than just told.

People need to be fully informed and shown why the eradication of cash is so dangerous, and shown how it will completely change their lives, if they allow it to happen. The purpose of the film is to warn.

I don’t have much experience in script writing or screenplay, so I am appealing for viewers to help. I am asking for a short scripted piece, lasting around 10 minutes. The piece will feature a central character or characters, an individual or friends, a couple or perhaps a family. Or perhaps even feature a few separate groups in different parts of the world? The piece will feature the announcement of the introduction of ‘programmable’ money. It will then follow the lives of the characters andshow the changes which happen in their lives over a number of years, possibly up to around 2030. Note here that our government might not choose to call it ‘programmable money’, and decide to use a new name. So the script needs to perhaps be vague about this. Other terms currently in use are stablecoin, britcoin, CBCD and programmable money.

If I receive a suitable, compelling script, I will endeavour to make it into a short film. I can offer 200 pounds for the script that I choose, plus a copy of my latest book and other merchandise. I realise this is not much, but I hope people will be driven by their conscience to write ascript, not by a reward.

Here’s what I would like the drama to portray

A huge global recession occurs in 2022 / 2023, this could be narrated with news broadcasts or conversation between the characters. As a ‘solution’ to prevent any future recession, the government wants to introduce a new type of money.

We will see the initial ‘selling’ of programmable money, by corporate media and government to the public and the propaganda associated with it. They will suggest that the new money will solve numerous issues in peoples every day lives. Namely: economic issues, health issues, social issues and security issues etc.

It will portray the character(s) downloading their new ‘app’ or CBDC ‘wallet’ for their new money to contain. Transferring or acquiring the new currency, and then trying out their new accounts.

The drama will illustrate clearly the motives behind why the characters stop using their cash, in favour of their new digital wallets. Those who issue the new money will make the new money ‘better’ than cash, by offering various incentives. There will also be subtle propaganda stigmatising the few who still insist on using cash.

There will be a honeymoon period where it all seems ok.

The presence and use of cash becomes less and less over a planned period of about 18 months. People aren’t that bothered because the new money seems to be working better than cash. It will be illegal to use cash by 2026.

Conversation about how funny life now is without cash, and perhaps some comments on how we “miss the cash”. But everyone is essentially happy because at this stage the new money seems as good as cash.

Slowly, over the next several years, one by one, various restrictions are placed on the use of the programmable money. The restrictions are applied in real time at the point of sale. Numerous excuses will be given for the restrictions, including health, environment and security.

The jobs available to the characters are increasingly online and tightly monitored and measured, making the characters feel like assets.

I will leave it up to the imagination of the writer as to how this might play out, and in what order things happens. It will be possible for those issuing your new programmable money to place the following restrictions …

They can limit geographically where you are allowed to make purchases. This could be used, for example, if another ‘pandemic’ was launched, to limit peoples spending to within a short distance of their homes. There are other excuses they could use for limiting geographical use, e.g., to reduce car usage.

They can limit what you can spend your money on. So they will be able to prevent you buying meat, or prevent you buying coal, or certain drugs, specific food etc. Anything they don’t want you to buy, for whatever reason they invent, they could sanction.

Similarly they could inflate sales of certain things by rewarding people for buying them.

They will be able to limit the quantity of things you buy. For example they could limit how many beers you can buy in one night. Or limit how much sugary food you can buy. The excuse of ‘shortages’ could well be used to limit your activity.

They will be able to put a cap on how much money you can hold in your account. Or only top up your account with limited amounts, if you behave in a certain way. They could limit your spending to a specific amount each day. They could change how much you can spend if you visit another area or country.

They can also vary how much money you pay for various goods. So they could make prices of certain things outside of your reach.

They could also limit spending to certain times of day, or deny it altogether.

Such a system will inevitably result in ‘tiers’ of types of user. In other words some ‘important’ people who perhaps work for the government or large corporations might have far less or no restrictions on their spending. This will create a multi tiered society.

The amount that you are ‘punished’ by the system will be dependant on your behaviour. For example if you express certain views online, your spending limits or habits could be restricted. Your money could be switched off altogether, if you are considered undesirable.

Two of the recurring excuses used to increase restrictions will be ‘repeated pandemics’ and ‘climate change’, among other engineered threats such as cyber attacks. Plus, each individual will have their own restrictions applied depending on their own specific behaviour. This would make the ‘programmable money’ system very similar to the social credit system that they currently have in China.

Over a number of years, the lives of the characters plunge into a dystopia, under a technocratic invisible world government and dictatorship.

It’s very important for the script to show that once the decision has been made, to introduce programmable money and give up using our cash, it will be too late to complain. Once it is too late to complain, things will only get worse. There is only one time to complain, and that is now.

Here are some further ideas from Iain Davis

May I suggest it focuses on two characters who are friends. One in favour of CBDC one opposed. I wouldn’t worry too much about time span as that will mean you have to age the characters with all the hassle of makeup and stuff.

Perhaps the opening scene could be the pair discussing their views on CBDC. Then as it rolls out one sticks rigidly to cash and uses counter-economics and the other simply follows CBDC.

Initially the non CBDC user struggles but they start building networks with other non CBDC users. They could be ridiculed by their CBDC using friend.

Then as more and more of the restrictions you show begin to apply the tables start to turn. The CBDC user faces all the limits you suggest while the non CBDC users network of contacts and suppliers grows. Perhaps ultimately ending with the CBDC user being denied food in a shop while the non user buys a crate of vegetables from a man in a van with LETS tokens or something.

One element I may add is that CBDC is set to control the cost of banking. When they want people to spend they will set negative interest rates and people’s CBDC will lose value in a bank forcing people to spend. When they want to slow spending they will restrict the amount they can spend. Maybe a scene where the CBDC user says to their non user friend I can’t talk now “I have to go shopping. I have been allocated a 1pm – 3pm slot.”

If you’d like to send me a script, send it to richard@richplanet.net.

I will keep the request to send me a script open until at least 1st January 2022.

Many thanks,

Richard

NOTE : DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, SEND TO richard@richplanet.net

“Terrorists” like you and me.
Thanks to Ellen Brown:

UK Opposition Leader Demands Boris Govt To Sanction Telegram For ‘harbouring Extremists’

United Kingdom’s Labour Party lawmaker Keir Starmer slammed messaging app Telegram for “harbouring extremists” and urged PM Johnson to take to tough measures

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/uk-news/uk-opposition-leader-demands-boris-govt-to-sanction-telegram-for-harbouring-extremists.html

https://100percentfedup.com/nj-election-update-56-voting-machines-were-shut-down-shipped-to-warehouse-on-election-night-in-dem-stronghold-county-where-gov-murphy-got-over-113k-votes/

Great stuff—some of it shocking—on Rolling Stone, UK’s plan to take down Telegram (we need some follow-up on that!), the elite “engineering” against Brexit as the prelude to the COVID lunacy in Britain, and much more, including both men’s problems with addiction, and how their faith has help them.

What makes this conversation such a pleasure is how honest, humane and eloquent these two heroes are, and how they’ve kept their sense of humor through it all.

Clapton’s doing this for the same reason that he’s still touring: because he loves the music, and knows how people need it. So why, we have to wonder, are so few of his peers standing with him? (George Harrison would have been with them, says Eric.)  

https://anchor.fm/rfkjr/episodes/Eric-Clapton-and-RFK-Jr-Stand-and-Deliver-e19l4ak