MCM – My husband corresponds with a person in New Zealand, who has relayed this grim news. ________________________
Without any debate or consultation, they have rushed through (i.e. within 24 hours) amendments to our health act which include the following measures:
1. Declare (without proof or evidence) a dwelling to be unsanitary and in turn order the destruction of the property and the burning of associated materials;
2. Hold us in “quarantine” until such time as we have tested negative to infectious disease AND we have undergone preventive treatment (i.e. mandatory inoculation)
3. Prohibit the keeping of animals and order the killing of animals (i.e. eliminate food sources)
4. Close any business not complying with prescribed infection control measures
Patrick Wood explains the connection between the 1992 Convention on Biodiversity and the 2020 Fear Pandemic: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/Lawsuits-C19-False-Claims.html#S79PWBeginning at 17:55: [Agenda 21 is] a very important aspect that you mention here. Rosa Corey was a friend of mine by the way, because she’s from California. She’d passed now but she was very outspoken on Agenda 21. Spot on as far as I’m concerned. We spoke together at a couple of conferences. And the physical aspects of sustainable development. How can I put this? There was the the property angle where Agenda 21 specified that private property would be essentially wiped out over a period of time. They didn’t want any private property anywhere. They wanted to control all the property—all the resources of the world. That’s where stuff comes from—you have forest, you have mining, you have oil and whatever—all comes out of the ground. Whatever we have anywhere, it all comes out of the ground one way or another. They wanted control of those resources and they didn’t want people to have control of those resources. So that was a big, major, major focus that we had say 10, 15 years ago, as we looked at Agenda 21.
But the closer—the more I look at it over time, the more I realize that the term “sustainable development” was a marketing term. It was very poorly defined by them to the people. And it’s like, well, Who would be against being sustainable? Of course you want to be sustainable because the implication is, well you’re going to die if you’re not sustainable. You need to do something to get on down the road. So it was marketed in a very slick way to hold a carrot out to the world: Well, if we learn how to be sustainable, we will last a lot longer in the world. Right? Might live longer, but the world might last longer too.
What they didn’t tell anybody at the time is that the price to be paid for that was turning over control of everything to them and let them control it. That’s a different deal than just like, Hey, we’re all in this together sort of thing. Like, Hey, you be sustainable, I’ll be sustainable. They want control of everything. And they were pretty clear about that.
What wasn’t brought out in this—and I want to stress this because this ties into the medical issues we’re dealing with today with the pandemic, et cetera—other things that they didn’t bring out that I think now are being brought out because of current events—I want to read you two short quotes from a book written by two eye witnesses and participants in the [1992] Rio conference. They were there. They went as full—they were scholars, they were environmentalists of the old school. They went there hoping to be a part of the new thing that was happening, this new sustainable development thing.They saw great hope initially, but they came away disillusioned. And so they wrote a book called THE EARTH BROKERS – Power, Politics and World Development. In this book, which I had read a few years ago—I had to read it again when the pandemic things began in early 2020. In their book, they talk about the Biodiversity Convention, as well as Agenda 21. And the Biodiversity Convention as I mentioned ran in parallel at the same physical conference but it was just two different tracks. Agenda 21 over here, the Biodiversity Convention over here. Same people in many cases moving back and forth between the different tracks. Here’s what they wrote in their book, The Earth Brokers…. this is a direct quote [on page 42]:
[T]he convention implicitly equates the diversity of life – animals and plants – to the diversity of genetic codes, for which read genetic resources. By doing so, diversity becomes something modern science can manipulate. Finally, the convention promotes biotechnology as being ‘essential for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity’. Article 16(1), Convention on Biological Diversity.
That is stunning because it gives you the insider definition of what biodiversity means. You and I might think biodiversity means there’s lots of different species in the forest and the jungle and the oceans and oh it’s wonderful. I love the natural world, I always have. I grew up on a farm. We had all kinds of stuff that was cool for a young guy to play with and observe. But biodiversity had a completely different meaning in 1992 at the Biodiversity Convention. Having just introduced that topic … what they said on the next page, a direct quote [on page 43], with the definition again of what the convention really means: [T]he main stake raised by the biodiversity convention is the issue of ownership and control over biological diversity. In the case of the North, and the USA in particular, the major concern was protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology industries …
When I read that again I was stunned, I felt a little embarrassed because I hadn’t seen it before. I hadn’t paid attention to it, I guess, because Covid was not in your face. The pandemic was not in your face. I just glossed over it just, okay, you know, some words and I went to the next paragraph. But this tells us that it wasn’t just a minor issue at the biodiversity convention. It was the main stake they said. The main issue. The main stake at the biodiversity convention was protecting the pharmaceutical and emerging biotechnology industries. And then as I looked at this again, I said, well, that was the time then when we were off to the races to implement all the things that we’re seeing today.
Look back and sift through the history of the last 25, 30 years, you’ll see many things that plug into this new concept. When the DNA-based or the synthetic DNA-based therapies began to be developed in the last few years, they were completely released to the public first with messenger RNA vaccines. And then in India, now there’s actually a DNA-based vaccine that’s being given to people there. It doesn’t go into the muscle. It just goes under the skin. And we see now that the shots have been introduced to humanity, we see now the intent that the whole world must participate in these DNA modification exercises of humanity.
When you ask the question, Where did this come from? I can trace it right back to the Biodiversity Convention, which ran in parallel with Agenda 21. This is where it all started. They set the groundwork, the legal groundwork, if you will, at the United Nations where a hundred, I think it was maybe 187 nations signed off on these agreements. That gave the United Nations the right, if you will, to come back later and say, You remember, you signed this agreement, Mr. Premiere, Mr. Prime Minister, and we’re going to hold you to it now.
So when the pandemic hit in January, it was released by the World Health Organization in January of 2020, and they said, well, we have a pandemic folks. The United Nations went to all these countries that participated in the Biodiversity Convention. And they said, This is what you signed. This is what we must do. We are taking control over this situation. And all of the nations of the world simultaneously panicked, ran off to execute the policies that were given to them to execute the lockdowns, the face mask, later the vaccines, all of the other stuff, the social distancing. All of these policies were shoved down the nations of the world’s throat because of what they signed off on at the Biodiversity Convention in 1992.
Thanks to my friend Eric Coppolino—whose Planet Waves needs your support (because its dedication to real science, in this hellish crisis, has cost it dearly)—we have these great videos of our presentations up at Arklight this last Sunday.
This story is about the anatomy of deceit, which is a genre of communication used both by private citizens and famous politicians. It is about addicting people to delusions, black hat marketing, pandemic terrorism, climate fear mongering, and S&M. More importantly, it is about the massive learning value of losing your bearings and then coming back to life. Most importantly, it is about regaining your grounding after being deceived and abused and perhaps temporarily tempted away from your soul.Now you know. And you are now so strong.
Photo by Jametlene Reskp via Unspash
A rhetorical question: What do you do when you see that a loved one is being deceived and siding with the deceiver because their senses have been temporarily overtaken? I tap into my love and pray for clarity. I tap into my strength and try not to get hurt by the expression of their temporary insanity. I pray for it to pass, serve its learning purpose, and transform into clarity, strength, and joy. I know with certainty that the universe protects the honest, and we can heal each other. I am not afraid. The most important thing, I am not afraid. I am not afraid because what I stand for is love, and love is what this universe is made of. There is literally nothing to be afraid of if you are on the side of the universe.
And now to the story.
I am going to start the arc with a very dark tale. From what I know, it really happened. There was a woman who was into BDSM. So one day she met a guy, and the guy ordered her to meet her in a desolate place. He also ordered her to bring her daughter. As she was in an altered sexual mind, in a fantasy, she was not thinking straight. She did as he told her. He was a serial killer. He killed both her and her daughter.
That story is heartbreaking and horrifying. Why did I bring it up? To highlight the importance of spotting a predator.
Poisoning the senses
All human beings perceive reality through their senses, with the brain mostly providing a justification for what the senses decide. If an external party is a predator or a confused individual, they can try to put someone’s senses into an altered mode that is divorced from reality—and then the person may give up on inner clarity, go with the dominant flow, and stop thinking straight. The person would end up in a state that is akin to being drugged. And when people give up on their inner clarity and stop thinking straight, they turn into food for any opportunistic attacker, and they may suffer accordingly. They may also drag others into their confusion.
[Which is what deceivers have been doing for as long as human beings have been around, and which is by the way what’s been done to a very large number people in the course of the past twenty months: a campaign in intentional sensory disorientation— but our souls will fight back sooner or later because our souls know what’s good for us.]
For a predator, it is highly desirable to get the target scared, confused, deluded, proud, isolated, attached to imaginary ideas, or otherwise disconnected from reality and from their clarifying resonant energy. Which is why, confusing, isolating, disorienting the target is very high on the predator’s list of priorities. (See, for example, this torture manual, especially the segment about techniques used to create a state of confusion and disorientation. It’s disgusting the but confusion and disorientation have been studied scientifically!)
S&M (a tangent)
Since S&M is a complex cultural and sensory phenomenon, and since there has been so much S&M theatrics in this “pandemic response,” I am going to go on a tangent and point out the difference between S&M and deceitful manipulation. S&M is a neutral thing. It’s a type of sensory flow that requires shifting perception in a particular manner, which allows a person to feel whatever the person desires to feel and express what is lurking on the inside. Altered states of mind are important for the soul and they are not a trivial thing, therefore playing with resonant, loving energy produces different results than playing with predators—and when people confuse one for the other, the results can be deadly.
What was done to the people in the past 20 months was deceit that attempted invoking associative symbols of submission. What was done to the people was disgusting and not remotely exciting or healing. S&M serves the purpose of expression and healing the trauma, and what they did was inflicting the trauma. Shame on them.
When political leaders try to change our behavior “for our own good,” should we trust them?
If we go with the basic psychology, I would say that being able to trust one’s government is a good feeling to live with. It’s like being a pet (assuming no one is trying to put you to sleep.) I would love to live in a world where trusting your leaders is possible!
So the question then is whether trusting your leaders today is based in reality. If your leaders inform you that something new and unusual is good for you and you therefore must necessarily do it, is it because they are trying to help—or it is because they are held by the balls very tightly by BlackRock? Are they fighting for you or throwing you under the bus? Which one is it? How can you tell?
Getting this one correctly is critical. And yes, real life is usually far more complex than a Hollywood film—but none the less, in this game of risk taking, what do you think is the chance that our leaders might be held by the balls by BlackRock investors? And if they are, what are the societal goals of the BlackRock investors?
Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it feels like
Let me define the sensory essence of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
It assumes that human beings have no soul and no intrinsic meaning, that our sensations and perceptions are a mechanical product of electrical impulses in the brain, and that our bodies can produce useful kinetic energy for the economy—while our “needs,” defined as financial instruments, can become objects of trading, gambling, government grants, and financial schemes.
It completely divorces us from nature and pretends that we are much like a mineral.
It’s something like this picture below, except for the people.
But of course, the marketing reps will tell you it’s highly desirable and it is the future!
And as if to confirm that the corporate masters don’t view you as sovereign, here is a story about an attempt to “hack your dreams” to influence you and sell you more products.
ZAGREB, 22 Nov 2021 – President Zoran Milanović said on Monday his office would summon the Austrian ambassador to convey his concern over “fundamental human freedoms” in that country after the government in Vienna recently summoned the Croatian ambassador over Milanović’s comments on COVID rules in Austria.
The Croatian diplomat was summoned last week after Milanović recently commented on the Austrian government’s anti-epidemic measures, noting that they were reminiscent of Fascism.
Asked by the press today about Austria’s imposing an all-out lockdown and its plan to introduce mandatory vaccination against COVID-19 as of February 2022, Milanović called it a disaster.
“I think the Swedes are much cleverer than they are than their authorities. Considering that our diplomats are being summoned, today the Austrian ambassador will be summoned so that we can convey our deep concern for the fundamental human freedoms in Austria,” Milanović said.
