Author: MCM
The lethal impact of the mRNA “vaccines” rushed out these last several months has been conveniently obscured by what “our free press” (mis)reports as the persistent daily toll of “COVID deaths.” That propaganda tactic has kept millions in the dark, and clamoring for their injections, unconscious of the risk they’re taking (and, by and large, the fact that those shots won’t prevent them from infection, but, theoretically, only lessen the severity of their symptoms).
Having been largely on hiatus, I’ve been unable to keep track of the stray reports, from all over, of post-injection deaths and injuries. Those interested in catching up should go to Children’s Health Defense, which has been doing an excellent job of following what may be the most urgent of all the many blacked-out stories of the COVID crisis (and that’s really saying something). CHD’s Defender is essential reading on this subject, among many others: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/
Here are just a few of such stories—one of which (attached), about Gibraltar, reported among friends last month, is among the most revealing of them all.
From Kathy Dopp:
See http://www.kathydopp.info/COVIDinfo/Vaccines/AdverseEvents top of the page for more information and source of analysis (from an Israeli researcher)
From the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS): Overall, percentages of deaths for January 2021 resembles those observed for previous years. However, the main difference is in the systematically much higher percentages of deaths, 146 times higher for 50 to 59 year olds, 150 times higher for age class 60 to 69, 129 times higher for 70 to 79 year olds. This suggests highly dangerous adverse effects by mRNA-based vaccine technology. Note: I believe the January 2021 deaths in age class zero are all due to spontaneous miscarriages in pregnant women receiving COVID vaccines, since, as explained by former Chief Science Officer of Pfizer, Michael Yeadon (linked from http://www.kathydopp.info/COVIDinfo/Vaccines/VaccineADE):
– The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
– The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
– The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
– The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.
Take some dramamine before you watch this:
https://twitter.com/DarrenPlymouth/status/1367577984564162560
Will the WHO hail this step, too?
Better watch this one ASAP, and download it:
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message4724927/pg1?c1=1&c2=1&disclaimer=Continue
And here’s what “vaccine apartheid” really looks like:

From Bretigne Shaffer:
Hi Mark,
Related to Josh’s comments, it’s important to recognize that even the people promoting this vaccine understand the risks of giving this rushed-through vaccine to so many people, and understand that it constitutes a massive human experiment.
One example: Paul Offit.
A friend transcribed some of his comments from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4xClOYM3iE
At about the 9:35 min mark:
“Twenty thousand people isn’t 20 million people and you’re only going to find out a rare serious adverse effect post approval. That’s definitely true. That’s always true…The term “safety” in the medical world means that benefits outweigh what are at this point theoretical risks. That’s what the word safety means. It doesn’t mean absolute safety…We may find that it causes a serious adverse event post approval. I hope not. But if we do, we have to be open minded to the fact that that might happen… “
10:46 min mark:
Dr. Baucher: “…Does the notion that this is mRNA [vaccine] make you more concerned or less concerned?Dr. Offit: “Well, more concerned. I mean, we have no commercial experience with a messenger RNA vaccine. So what we’ve done is you take this naked piece of messenger RNA. You encapsulate it into this complex lipid delivery system which enables the cell then to take it up. I mean, if you just injected messenger RNA, the ribonucleases in your body would immediately destroy it. So it wouldn’t work. So you ‘re trying to protect it to get it into the cell. So now once it’s in the cell, that messenger RNA is self reproducing in a sense. So and now you’re making the protein. You’re making the coronavirus spike protein which then for the most part gets inserted onto the cell membrane and to a lesser extent gets excreted into the circulation.
WHAT TURNS IT OFF?WHAT MAKES IT SO THAT IT IS NO LONGER MAKING CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEIN ANYMORE?
If you look at the animal model studies, mice, for example, you would ASSUME that goes on for about 10 days.
BUT WHAT HAPPENS IN HUMANS, I DON’T KNOW.
I MEAN, WE WILL FIND THAT OUT, I THINK OVER TIME.
The other thing is that it’s also true of all proteins that, foreign proteins. It’s going to be broken up into like a 15 or 20 mer (? Inaudible) piece that’s then put on the surface of that cell so that you can stimulate either with MHC1 or 2 glycoprotein to stimulate cytotoxic (inaudible ?) T cells, to stimulate T helper cells, because this mRNA is going to also be picked up by antigen presenting cells.
SO WHICH IS MORE COMMON?
IS IT BEING PICKED UP PRIMARILY BY MYOCTYES? MUSCLE CELLS?
IS IT BEING PICKED UP PRIMARILY BY ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELLS?
WHEN IT’S PICKED UP BY THE MYOCYTES IS IT JUST PICKED UP BY THE MYOCYTES THAT ARE TO SOME EXTENT DAMAGED AS YOU PUT, AS YOU INJECT IT?I MEAN, ANTIGEN PRESENTING CELLS ARE MORE LIKELY TO ACT AS SCAVENGERS AND PICK IT UP MORE EASILY.
WHAT’S GOING ON?
YOU KNOW, YOU DON’T KNOW EXACTLY ALL OF THAT.
So, it’s always a little uncertain because you know, I just think you have to be humble in all of this, that THERE ARE THINGS I AM SURE THAT WE DON’T KNOW YET and so we have to be open to the fact that we don’t know everything.
So keep our eyes open.But on its face, you know, we’re dealing with a pandemic that’s brought us to our knees. I mean, we have massive joblessness and homelessness and food insecurity.
IF this vaccine in anyway looks like the top line data looks, it’s a lifesaver.”
Bretigne
Democracy is “unsafe.”
From Josh Mitteldorf (to Kathy Dopp, responding to her caveat about the mRNA story):
Hi, Kathy:
Thanks for your skepticism. I haven’t looked into the claim deeply. I think it’s a possibility [that mRNA deactivates tumor-suppressing proteins], and it’s fun to circulate it in our circle of COVID rebels. But I’m more interested in the question of what we should prevent for consideration by those who are not already convinced.
My message has been: We know this “vaccine” is a new technology, and we have have every reason to think it has long-term effects on the body’s immune system. In the past, we have gauged those long-term effects before licensing vaccines, even when they are not based on new technologies, and we have found some positive long-term effects and some negative long-term effects. In the case of the COVID vaccines, we have rushed them out to hundreds of millions of people without any idea what the long-term effects are. By any standard of medical practice pre-2020, this would be considered irresponsible, dangerous, some would say criminal. Is COVID19 really such a threat that it justifies massive experimentation with human lives at stake?
And here’s my new message, which I welcome you to try out: The COVID virus is usually gone from the patient within a few days. What gets people into the hospital and sometimes kills them is called a cytokine storm. The body is overreacting with inflammation so strong that it can be suicidal. This is how people die of COVID. The virus doesn’t kill them directly.
Fast-forward to the vaccine. Vaccines have the function of prepping the body, ensuring a stronger immune response the next time the pathogen appears. If all goes well, the virus appears, the body is ready for it, and the immune system wipes out the virus quickly, before it can take hold. No further action is needed, and the patient doesn’t become sick. But when things go badly, the virus appears and the body reacts TOO strongly, going quickly into cytokine storm mode. The virus can be MORE deadly to people who have had the vaccine. This is called “pathogenic priming”, and it is not just a theoretical possibility. It happened repeatedly in ferrets during testing of earlier coronavirus vaccines, and that’s why we haven’t had coronavirus vaccines until this last year.
The current crops of vaccines have been confirmed to provoke an immune response in humans. The question is, how often will the response be appropriate, and how often will it be in the regime of pathogenic priming? In other words, how many people will avoid the disease because they have been vaccinated, and how many will have a MORE SEVERE CASE because they’ve been vaccinated? The abbreviated vaccine trials were not designed to answer this question, but there are now millions of people who have been vaccinated, and it will be important to watch them and see.
– Josh
To get a sense of what a monster Geisel was, check out Seussville: https://www.seussville.com/.
https://reclaimthenet.org/ebay-bans-listings-of-some-used-dr-seuss-books/