The true toll of those mRNA “vaccines” is vastly higher than “our free press” has been telling us (MUST-READ—especially about Gibraltar)

The lethal impact of the mRNA “vaccines” rushed out these last several months has been conveniently obscured by what “our free press” (mis)reports as the persistent daily toll of “COVID deaths.” That propaganda tactic has kept millions in the dark, and clamoring for their injections, unconscious of the risk they’re taking (and, by and large, the fact that those shots won’t prevent them from infection, but, theoretically, only lessen the severity of their symptoms). 

Having been largely on hiatus, I’ve been unable to keep track of the stray reports, from all over, of post-injection deaths and injuries. Those interested in catching up should go to Children’s Health Defense, which has been doing an excellent job of following what may be the most urgent of all the many blacked-out stories of the COVID crisis (and that’s really saying something). CHD’s Defender is essential reading on this subject, among many others:

Here are just a few of such stories—one of which (attached), about Gibraltar, reported among friends last month, is among the most revealing of them all.

From Kathy Dopp:

See top of the page for more information and source of analysis (from an Israeli researcher)

From the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS): Overall, percentages of deaths for January 2021 resembles those observed for previous years. However, the main difference is in the systematically much higher percentages of deaths, 146 times higher for 50 to 59 year olds, 150 times higher for age class 60 to 69, 129 times higher for 70 to 79 year olds. This suggests highly dangerous adverse effects by mRNA-based vaccine technology. Note: I believe the January 2021 deaths in age class zero are all due to spontaneous miscarriages in pregnant women receiving COVID vaccines, since, as explained by former Chief Science Officer of Pfizer, Michael Yeadon (linked from 

The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.
– The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.
– The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
– The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.