It looks like I’ve neglected to send out this urgent interview with Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi; so I am sending it now, urging you to send it far and wide—since many of the 14,000+ comments show that it’s saved lives among its 1,250,000+ viewers. (Why has YouTube left it up, when they have taken down so many of the other interviews in the Perspectives series? Good question.)
The CDC is fiddling with the data by reducing the sensitivity of the test by more than 4,000 times. It’s an evil trick that means from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with COVID-19 than vaccinated people.
COVID-19 has been a pandemic of false positive tests; the thing that kept the fraud going was the fact that laboratories were using excessively high cycle thresholds (CTs) when processing the PCR tests, resulting in false positives
Now, as over 100 million Americans have been “vaccinated” against COVID-19, the CDC is lowering the CT from 40 to 28, but only when diagnosing vaccine breakthrough cases — cases where fully vaccinated individuals are diagnosed with COVID-19
To make matters worse, the CDC also will no longer record mild or asymptomatic infections of those who were immunized as “COVID cases.” The only cases that now count as COVID cases for someone immunized with the COVID-19 vaccine are those that result in hospitalization or death
While healthy people continue to be misdiagnosed as having COVID-19 when they really don’t, thanks to an excessively high CT, the CDC is simultaneously minimizing the number of breakthrough cases by using a CT that will minimize the number of false positives
Other countries are also manipulating data to boost COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and hide breakthrough cases. In the U.K., COVID-19 will only be listed as the cause of death if the patient actually died from an active case of COVID-19 and nothing else
CDC Is Cooking the Books on COVID Breakthrough Cases
Originally, the CDC recommended labs use a CT of 40 when testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection. This despite using a CT above 35 was known to create a false positive rate of 97%. In short, by using an exaggerated CT, healthy people were deemed stricken with COVID-19, and the fraud was further propped up by introducing the fallacy that asymptomatic carriers were responsible for a large portion of the spread.
They met yesterday on COVID “vaccine” licensure/authorization for children. Meryl Nass’s live blog nailed the staggering conflicts of interest that make them do that they thing they do.
This recalls (to those who’ve paid attention), the tale of Edgar Maddison Welch, who reportedly fired a rifle shot into the ceiling of Comet Pizza, in hopes of rescuing the kids held captive there, the Pizzagate “conspiracy theory” having driving him around the bend. This story of the Belgian sniper also harks back to the propaganda shrieking of the clear and present danger posed by QAnon, and its imaginary links to several crimes that were probably fictitious, too.
Then there was that platoon of “far-right” types in Michigan who planned to kidnap Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, and that pack of “neo-Nazis” who tried to storm the Reichstag (!) just as RFK, Jr. was addressing that gigantic, wholly peaceful crowd of anti-lockdown protesters in Berlin.
I know all too many educated people who’ve believed those stories to be true, and fell especially hard for that preposterous charade in the Capitol on Jan. 6. What’s really putting all of us at risk is not such actors posing as far-right extremists, but the abject credulity of all those educated liberals who don’t know enough to see through all such tripe (which, skillfully aimed at them, is imperceptible to them as scare propaganda).
Generally, the technology seems to involve an external magnet to direct the magnetized nanoparticles. But there is another effect that is less intuitive. “In addition, the magnetic field pulls the magnetic nanoparticles into the target cells, which also helps to increase the uptake of DNA.”
Of concern: “Despite broad application of nanotechnology in neuroscience, the nanoneurotoxicity of magnetic nanoparticles in primary hippocampal neurons remains poorly characterized. In particular, understanding how magnetic nanoparticles perturb neuronal calcium homeostasis is critical when considering magnetic nanoparticles as a nonviral vector for effective gene therapy in neuronal diseases.” source
Daszak made the admission at a 2016 forum discussing “emerging infectious diseases and the next pandemic,” which appears to be at odds with Fauci’s repeated denial of funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
While describing how his organization sequences deadly viruses, Daszak describes the process of “insert[ing] spike proteins” into viruses to see if they can “bind to human cells” as being carried out by his “colleagues in China”:“Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them, some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we… Well I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people.
