Sounds familiar. Rancourt has compiled some of the scientific evidence, in peer-reviewed journals, that masks and respirators aren’t effective barriers against transmission of respiratory viruses. So that is not allowed?
Author: MCM
Note the authors’ call for further research, “to validate reasoning aberrations as risk factors”—i.e., to figure out how dangerous such crackpots are. (I think that’s what it means. It’s written so abysmally that I may have misread it, though I doubt I have.)
Please feel free to check the authors’ institutional affiliations, to see if their employers are financially entangled with Big Pharma and/or Bill/Melinda Gates.
(I use those scare quotes in the subject line because the “vaccine” in question here is Pfizer’s experimental elixir.)
Let’s overlook the Epoch Times‘ now calling COVID-19 the “CCP virus”—a stroke of propaganda that bespeaks the outlet’s warlike stance on China. That bias has not prevented Epoch Times from doing a lot of first-rate coverage of the COVID crisis (and the controversy since the last election).
What matters here is the finding that the B.1.351 variant of COVID-19 “affects” the vaccinated [sic] significantly more than the unjabbed. (The article does not get into how that variant has “affected” those who’ve caught it.)
Please share with everyone you know whose mind has not (yet) been shut down by terror and hypoxia.
From “Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis,” by Baruch Vainshelboim, in Medical Hypotheses.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987720333028?via%3Dihub
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/
Read this piece, by a good friend; and then, perhaps, watch this: https://youtu.be/dXWImaYevG0
Categories
A timely C.S. Lewis quote that IS authentic
From Marilyn Lonigro:
Andrew Saul is correct that the CS Lewis quote is bogus. However, this one is real and quite timely:
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
From “God in the Dock.”
Thanks for your email list.
All those new COVID-19 “variants of concern” require a global strategy of “maximum suppression,” because “vaccines will not be enough”to wipe out those demonic offshoots of “the coronavirus.” So claims an impressively credentialed team of (and I say this with all due respect) avid medical-industrial whores, as every single one of them works for a corporate entity that’s been lavishly funded by Pfizer, GAVI and/or the Gates Foundation, as well as (in the case of the Oceanically named Earth Institute) Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis—and GE, Procter & Gamble, PepsiCo and Monsanto, among other corporations notorious (among those who pay attention) for their ruinous impact on our health, and planet Earth—which these generously funded experts call for locking down completely, and (no doubt) forever, to enable “prompt vaccine rollouts,” and prevent the global population (or what’s left of it) from ever congregating, for whatever reason, or, for that matter, procreating:
Public health leaders should focus on efforts that maximally suppress viral infection rates, thus helping to prevent the emergence of mutations that can become new variants of concern.
Prompt vaccine rollouts alone will not be enough to achieve this; continued public health measures, such as face masks and physical distancing, will be vital too. Ventilation of indoor spaces is important, some of which is under people’s control, some of which will require adjustments to buildings.
I’d like to know what those “adjustments” are, and whose “control” they will be “under,” if not “people’s.” But I’m more curious to know why this appalling manifesto is on Naked Capitalism, which I’ve long admired (and which put up The Art of the Gouge, a detailed report on how NYU squeezes cash out of its students, and what they spend that money on—a still-eye-opening document put out six years ago by NYU Faculty Against the Sexton Plan, a non-profit co-founded by myself, and formed to fight “NYU 2031,” the grotesque real estate expansion plan that NYU’s trustees and president tried to force on Greenwich Village).
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/05/the-art-of-the-gouge-nyu-as-a-model-for-predatory-higher-education.html
But I digress. (I’ll save that story for my memoirs.)
As for the terroristic notion of new COVID-19 “variants” requiring ever more new “vaccinations,” please read Keith Rushworth’s meticulous analysis (attached), and weigh in if you please.
Categories
That C.S. Lewis quote is not by C.S. Lewis
From Andrew W. Saul:
As far as I can ascertain, the “quote” is entirely bogus. I do not like “fact-checkers” very much, but in this case, I think they are correct. A Google search brought up several debunks. It is certainly not in Screwtape, a book I highly value, along with the trilogy.
It’s true that all those exclamation marks don’t seem Lewisian (if that’s a word); so maybe that great quote was penned by someone else.
I readily believed it, because I just so happen to be halfway through That Hideous Strength, which, though published in 1945, eerily foretells what’s happening now (the technocratic—or, as Lewis casts it, Satanic—drive to wipe out nature, and thereby control humanity), and, in particular, the corporate takeover of universities.
So I strongly recommend that book by C.S. Lewis; and if anyone can tell us, definitively, where that quote comes from, I would appreciate it greatly.
Better watch it right away, download it, and share it: https://www.youtube.com/embed/Yr8n9TUdfKc
He too has been much-abused as a “conspiracy theorist,” mostly by Americans and Brits. (He lives in Germany, where, he notes, the COVID tyranny is—all too obviously—not uniquely German.)