Categories
NFU

More shame on Lisa Krieger, and the Mercury News, for their puff-piece on Stanford’s heinous program “vaccinating” babies and young children

It gladdens me to have such sharp observers on this list. 

From Victoria Ward:

Dear Ms. Krieger,

I read your article of April 15 with horror.  Years ago I wrote to your paper concerning a puff piece on Stanford vivisection.  My letter was edited to water down my views.  Also, I learned at the time that the writer belonged to a journalists’ association that required conformity with “the science” of the day.  

Clearly things have gotten even worse.  Now U.S. children are openly fair game for experimentation.  Language has become so debased that you described them as “volunteers”.  And all it takes is for a vaccine manufacturer to announce that its vaccine is “safe and effective in adolescents as young as 12” for it to be apparently reasonable to you that it should now be “tested in much younger children”.  Never mind that, according to you, Pfizer does not even have an Emergency Use Authorization for the 12 to 15 year olds.

Lastly, where is the citation for your claim that “Because about one-quarter of all Americans are under the age of 18, the nation won’t reach herd immunity without inoculating young people.”  Surely that is a claim that requires some authority behind it.  Or perhaps authorities are less needed in puff pieces on medical experimentation on children.

Sincerely,
Victoria Ward
Santa Barbara, California

Categories
NFU

Vivek has passed away

https://www.dnaindia.com/entertainment/report-veteran-tamil-actor-and-comedian-vivek-dies-at-59-in-chennai-hospital-2886699

Categories
NFU

MCM discusses NYU, propaganda, censorship, “divide and conquer,” and much more with Tessa Leena

A good, long conversation that I hope you will enjoy as much as we did. 

Categories
NFU

Head of Denmark’s medicines agency passes out during press conference on decision to stop using AstraZeneca “vaccine”

Had she herself been “vaccinated,” or was it something else?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/head-denmarks-health-agency-keels-drops-unconscious-presser-decision-stop-using-astrazeneca-vaccines-happens-vaccinated/

Categories
NFU

Vivek, famed Indian actor, in critical condition due to cardiac arrest one day after COVID-19 “vaccination”

https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/actor-vivek-critical-after-cardiac-arrest-hospitalised-chennai-147247

Categories
NFU

“Blood Clots and Beyond”, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi on the near- and long-term risks of gene-based injections

From John Kirby:

In February, 2021, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D. and a number of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency about the potential danger of blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections.

Since then, two of the four injections have been suspended or recalled in Europe and the United States for just that reason. In this episode of Perspectives, Professor Bhakdi explains the science behind the problem, why it is not just limited to the products already suspended, and why in the long-term we may be creating dangerously overactive immune systems in billions of unwitting subjects. 

https://youtu.be/pyPjAfNNA-U

Categories
NFU

Facebook censors NY Post report on BLM co-founder’s $3.2 million purchase of four homes

Why? That is, what’s the given reason for this censorship? The real reason may pertain to Patrice Khan-Cullors’ actual function as either a state-sponsored “radical,” or a functionary of the World Economic Forum, or both.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/facebook-bans-sharing-new-york-post-report-blm-co-founder-home-purchases

Categories
NFU

Twitter permanently suspends Project Veritas’s James O’Keefe

James O’Keefe should sue Twitter—or, better yet, he should start organizing a class action suit by all (of us) who’ve been “suspended” or shadow-banned by Twitter, along with others who feel that they have been deprived of the variety of viewpoints that would all have their say on a proper commons.

In any case, if we don’t get together and do everything we can to smash this propaganda tyranny, it’s going to help smash all of us, and not just metaphorically.

https://thehill.com/media/548530-twitter-suspended-project-veritass-james-okeefe

Categories
NFU

“Live on the Air, a New Parade!”: Amy Smiley’s latest paper jam

Categories
NFU

A righteous letter to a “journalist” who shouldn’t be employed by a newspaper (or allowed near children)

Joseph Billings wrote this excellent letter to Lisa M. Krieger, the Mercury News reporter who churned out that propaganda puff-piece about Stanford’s experimental mRNA “vaccination” of babies and young children.

There should be many more such letters sent to more such “journalists,” and they too should be widely shared.

Dear Lisa,

     I have a few questions concerning your April 15th article describing Stanford University’s recent Pfizer mRNA injection experiments on children.   

     Isn’t there compelling research demonstrating that children very rarely die from exposure to the virus, which the Pfizer mRNA injection is ostensibly aimed at attacking?  And doesn’t some of this research include the very studies which, according to your article, Dr. Maldonado now claims are somehow obsolete or in need of broader understanding?  After reading your rather casual report of Dr. Maldonado’s suddenly new opinions, I am inclined to ask, did you submit Dr. Maldonado’s claims to any other experts (including medical ethics experts) before writing your article concerning Stanford’s experiments?  I ask because you certainly made no attempt at all in the article itself to explore the details of any study that Dr. Maldonado might be relying upon to justify the Stanford experiments or, worse, to explore the ethics of conducting medical experiments on children for any reason.  I would have thought that the obvious moral implications of conducting medical experiments on children would have alone caused you to take a very hard look at Dr. Maldonado’s opinions. 

       Also, I would be grateful if you would explain how you justify referring so cynically and euphemistically to the most vulnerable and defenseless members of our human community (children) as “the littlest volunteers.”  In what sense do you claim, for example, that the apparently frightened, masked young boy in the disturbing photograph linked with your article is a volunteer? For the moment, I am inclined to think that you have actually revealed a case that calls for independent child advocate counsel to be appointed for young Andel Good and any other child who finds himself targeted for medical experimentation.  It’s a little chilling to me that you can so thoughtlessly refer to a three-year-old child as a “volunteer” for a medical experiment.  Should we hire clowns to recruit such volunteers?  Indeed, it appears from the article-related photograph that someone found it helpful for some reason to dance a stuffed animal before the child.  

     I never would have thought in several lifetimes that I would see the day that we would need to explain the Nuremberg Code to American doctors and journalists –especially in defense of children.  Surely you are at least aware that a range of crimes in every state of the union is based upon the principle that children are incapable of consenting to acts (even with parental approval) that we otherwise leave to the discretion of adults in light of the possible serious consequences of the act. And even in the case of adults, an act will not be judged “voluntary” unless consent is based upon accurate and adequate information (the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth).  Based upon your research into your article, do you think that three-year-old Andel had this truth at his disposal, studied the risks of the mRNA experiment, and then offered his informed “consent”?  Do you have solid grounds (evidence) to believe that even his parents had such information?   

      What exactly was the aim of your April 15th piece?  Because it lacks the rudiments of responsible journalism (e.g. juxtaposition of divergent expert opinions), I hardly know how to categorize it.  Certainly, consultation with the Children’s Health Defense, for example, would have improved the balance of your article immeasurably.  But frankly, I worry that you intended propaganda rather than responsible journalism.      

     I would be grateful if you would share with me any peer reviewed research that you might have studied before you repeated Dr. Maldonado’s claims in support of Stanford’s child experiments.  Did you make any effort at all to critically evaluate those claims?  If you consulted other experts concerning Dr. Maldonado’s opinions and justification for conducting mRNA injection experiments on children before you wrote your article (an elementary rule in responsible journalism), would you be good enough to share with me the names of the experts whom you consulted? I would like to know who they were, what you asked them, and what they told you.  And I would like to see that as a responsible journalist you obtained and evaluated any evidence in support of what you were told.  

     I worry that you have written a piece of highly irresponsible journalism (maybe even reckless and shameful propaganda), but I would like to get the facts clear before I reach any conclusions.  

                                       Regards,
                                       Joseph Billings