Notice how those hirelings show no interest in the science on this question, but instantly politicize the issue, taking Redfield’s “side,” however ill-informed.
Watch the video in this article from ZeroHedge, then read the Los Angeles Times article about it, with its dramatic photo of a wounded protester tended to by medics.
When, and by what, was that woman hurt? The overhead video of the truck’s passage through the crowd shows no such thing.
Unless I’m missing something (and please tell me if I am), this is as scary as it is disorienting. The whole episode, from the high-speed chase by that black truck, to the violent assault by its passengers, to the arrest of the driver they’d attacked, to the LA Times’ patently staged visual, appears to be one moment from a massive psy-op.
This is a great series on Global Research Radio; I’m honored to be the second guest, in an interview that’s airing now. I’ll send the link out when I get it.
This from a man with a vaccine-injured child.
Certain of Trump’s ever-hopeful followers may see this as some kind of shrewd maneuver on his part, intended to outflank his pseudo-adversary, Dr. Fauci; but I think it’s something else—shrewd, yes, but not on our behalf:
In light of the pro wrestling character of US “politics,” this looks like a set-up to cast Biden/Harris, or who/whatever takes Trump’s place, as very cautious, so that the COVID-19 vaccine will appear to have been duly safety-tested (although, in fact, no vaccines ever really are), and every anti-Trumper, and some others, will feel wonderfully relieved that Trump’s no longer “putting us at risk” by interfering in the (non-existent) safety-testing protocol; so they will all be more inclined to get their shots (which he, Gates, Fauci and the rest of them most certainly won’t get, just as they don’t wear masks, except on camera).
From my righteous brother in Chicago:
Dear Mr. Barker-
I am a relatively new subscriber, and a refugee from the New York Times, a paper I read for 38 years. I ceased reading it because of its panic-inspiring presentations of the SARS-CoV-2 crisis. No doubt writing an email like this is a quixotic undertaking, as I’ve emailed reporters before (not many editors) and if I get an answer at all it is simply a recitation of what I’ve already read that prompted my email. I did get a long response from the editor of the Chronicle of Higher Education who was willing to consider what I had to say.
I realize there is a certain orthodoxy in reporting about COVID, and that many newspapers share certain principles, articles of faith, really, that have no firm scientific basis, but are repeated ad nauseam until the whole world is swaying to the music of those frightening, hypnotic and dire words of warning and threat.
I read this sentence in your newspaper today:
“fatigue with social-distancing rules and mask wearing has been one of the main drivers of infections in Europe’s second wave.” There is absolutely no scientific basis for this assertion.
As for masks, the Dutch government recently announced they would not impose a mask mandate, and there are other countries that have rejected that approach as well. Oxford University’s Center for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) is an invaluable source of information for anyone writing about the crisis. That is, for anyone who sincerely wishes to “follow the science.”
There is no evidence masks block the transmission of airborne viruses, and in some cases (see the Hanoi Hospital study from 2015 https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577.short) such as with hospital workers wearing cloth masks, the masks made flu infection of the wearers much more likely.
Furthermore, what is meant by “infections” involves a real sleight of hand, since PCR test positive results depend on the cycle threshold used in the test, the higher the number the more people who are not infectious test positive.
I am sure you know all this already and I am sure none of this will change what is published in the Times, the WSJ, the Washington Post, but, you do the country a great disservice by enabling the lockdowns that have destroyed our economy and countless lives. I recently learned of an annual conference (AUP Association of University Presses) that will be held virtually in June, 2021. In light of the great public fear, what a French philosopher as described as “bioterror,” what will become of our downtown business districts, our transit systems, our workers, the remaining (and struggling) retail stores? I urge you to consider the truly dire consequences of your actions in fueling public fear and aiding political leaders who impose damaging and medically questionable measures without public consent.
So why no studies by the CDC or WHO? Don’t those lives matter?
Here’s a small pilot study finding that Vitamin D, administered as soon as COVID-19 sufferers were hospitalized for acute respiratory infection, made a significant difference in ICU admissions and mortality.
Dr. John Campbell walks us through it:
Are they afraid of getting Belarussed?