https://www.facebook.com/marie.berry.98096/videos/196958842459193
Categories
Governor Newsom’s ‘State of Emergency’ Challenged in California Supreme Court, 11 Aug 2021
In a petition filed Tuesday in the California Supreme Court, the Orange County Board of Education and Children’s Health Defense asked the court to declare an immediate end to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s state of emergency, arguing Newsom himself last week said the emergency was over.
CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, and CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE-CALIFORNIA CHAPTER, Petitioners, vs. GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of California, Respondent. VERIFIED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES. IMMEDIATE RELIEF REQUESTED (Palma Notice Requested). Filed in The Supreme Court of the State of California, 10 Aug 2021 (pp. 121)
My favorite line:
Restrictive gender norms may be exacerbated by isolation strategies such as shielding.
Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
Updated July 26, 2020
Print
This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.1,2 This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available. Please check the CDC website periodically for updates.
Click on the link for the rest.
If her father was as smart as she is, he was too dumb to live—and so is she (and so are his doctors, if that’s what they really said, and it probably is).
https://twitter.com/the_real_fly/status/1425600801066606597?s=27
This is as riveting as it is lucid. Watch it through, and send it
far and wide; because what’s happening in Israel is going to happen here and everywhere, if we don’t stop it.
From Health Freedom Defense Fund:
Important updates! August 11, 2021
Los Angeles Unified School District Abandons Mandatory Vaccination Due to Lawsuit
| We are pleased to report that through our efforts, vaccination with the experimental COVID-19 shots, issued under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), is no longer mandatory at the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD). On July 27, 2021, the case against LAUSD was dismissed without prejudice, as the judge concluded the district had indeed abandoned the mandatory C-19 vaccination policy, communicated through various channels to the public, teachers, and staff before the lawsuit was filed. This is a BIG win – because of the lawsuit, LAUSD represented to the court on the record that it does not have a policy requiring vaccination with EUA products. Since the court has now confirmed the absence of any policy requiring vaccination at LAUSD, all teachers and staff are safe to return to work without vaccination or furnishing proof of vaccination in the fall. We consider this an important victory for individual freedom for LAUSD personnel because it accomplished precisely what we sought in filing the lawsuit. Read more at https://healthfreedomdefense.org/2021/08/los-angeles-unified-school-district-abandons-mandatory-vaccination-due-to-lawsuit/ |
Bodily Integrity – Where is YOUR Line in the Sand?
Difficult decisions lie ahead for all Americans who value bodily autonomy and freedom and are opting out of the new experimental injections being mandated by government and private business acting as an extension of government, which will push those who choose a different path to the sidelines of society. What are we to do in the face of this extreme tyranny?
Complying is NOT the answer.
Watch Leslie Manookian of Health Freedom Defense Fund asking the hard questions; what does it look like to take a stand for what you believe in? What are you willing to do to preserve your precious bodily integrity? What can you do to protect your children and future generations? We believe Americans have what it takes, the creativity, independence, and innovation that we are known for throughout the world. Do not give up, do not give in, link arms with others and stand up for your rights. It is time to draw your line in the sand.Health Freedom Defense Fund Helps HFDF Member Sue School District
Excerpt from The Center Square
Court to rule on Phoenix school district mask mandate by Elizabeth Troutman August 9, 2021
(The Center Square) – A Phoenix teacher filed a lawsuit against the Phoenix Union High School District (PUHSD) for requiring that students and teachers wear masks at school, arguing that state law prohibits school mask mandates.
Douglas Hester, a Metro Tech High School teacher, sued the district, its governing board, and its superintendent in Maricopa County Superior Court. He requested a temporary restraining order on PUHSD on the grounds that the district’s mask policy is contrary to state law. Hester is represented by Alexander Kolodin, a member of the legal team for the Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF).
The FY 2022 state budget made it illegal for schools to require that students wear face-coverings or receive the vaccine to receive in-person instruction. This did not stop the Phoenix school district from requiring that students and staff keep their masks on in response to the recent uptick in COVID-19 cases. Read more…Help HFDF make an even bigger impact!
We have more big legal actions planned in many states across the nation as well as at the federal level, and having members in all fifty states allows HFDF to bring suit on behalf of our members wherever they may reside.
Help us protect and defend health freedom and join our official members list. Join the Fight
Donate to the Cause
Your support and donations go directly to our efforts to challenge unjust laws and enables us to take our expertly-crafted legal arguments to the highest level, ensuring this assault on our health freedoms never happens again. Donate
Blog/Updates Truly Awful but Important News Today
August 4, 2021 Health Freedom Defense Fund stands by Dr. Peter McCullough
August 1, 2021 Department of Justice Says There is No Rule of Law in the USA
July 28, 2021 HFDF Legal Update and How We Need YOU To Stand Up (VIDEO with Catherine Austin Fitts)
July 27, 2021 Health Freedom Defense Fund Sues Biden Administration Over Mask Mandate
July 13, 2021 Body Autonomy and Private Property Rights (VIDEO)
June 11, 2021
Follow Us on Social Media
We’re on Telegram and MeWe with more platforms coming soon!
Telegram: https://t.me/HealthFreedomDefense
MeWe: https://mewe.com/p/healthfreedomdefensefund
© Copyright, 2021, Health Freedom Defense Fund • 506 Alder Street, 2nd Floor, Ste. 1
Categories
Good news from an invaluable ally
I urge you to subscribe to Celia’s Substack, for her intrepid coverage of what will, one day, be recognized as World War III.
Back In A New Form
Aug 11
| As of 3 days ago, a significant recovery from the strange illness I suffered began over a month ago. Today as I write this, I am happy to report that I feel virtually restored to normal. The pain is gone, and most of the bizarre symptoms I described have receded. I still have a long road of full recovery ahead but I’m alright and my spirit is beginning to feel like itself again. I hope you stayed, and I look forward to all of us interacting again, and facing these cataclysmic days ahead together. Thank you all for your support, prayers, and dispatches of helpful information. In many ways, I am a new person, and the parts of the old one that needed to be cast off or even crucified, have been. I regret having to be gone for so long but I’m really glad to be back. |
Jon Rappoport’s Blog
NoMoreFakeNews.com
Bombshell: FDA knew all along there would be many COVID cases among the fully vaccinated—and buried that knowledge
Aug11
by Jon Rappoport
August 11, 2021
(To join our email list, click here.)
First of all, I have to re-emphasize a point I’ve made many times: SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’ve been proving that for over a year.
BUT I don’t stop there. I temporarily enter the official world where people assume the virus does exist, and I reveal many internal contradictions and lies and cover-ups within that world.
Some readers, who possess sub-standard literacy, believe I’m contradicting MYSELF. They think I’m saying the virus doesn’t exist and does exist.
Wrong.
Analogy: People sitting inside a theater are watching a movie, and they believe it’s a real world. They react in all sorts of strange ways, based on that assumption. You’re standing outside the theater, looking through the window. You can just say, “They’re all crazy,” and leave it at that, or you can say, “They’re all crazy,” and THEN walk inside the theater and get a good look at what they’re up to as well. That’s what I do.
That’s what I’m doing in this article, which is about the FDA and their emergency authorization of the COVID vaccine, despite knowing the vaccine didn’t pass muster, didn’t even vaguely rank as effective in the clinical trials.
Because lots of people in the clinical trial became COVID cases after being vaccinated.
In other words, the FDA knew, right from the get-go, that many so-called breakthrough cases would develop. They knew many vaccinated people would become COVID cases.
This knowledge should have prevented the FDA from granting emergency use authorization for the vaccine—but it didn’t.
(Reminder: We’re in the crazy fake theater now, where the virus is real, the PCR test is meaningful and accurate, the vaccine is necessary.)
Here we go.
The document, posted on the FDA website, is titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products; Advisory Committee Meeting; FDA Briefing Document Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.” [1]
It is dated December 10, 2020. The date tells us that all the information in the document is taken from the Pfizer clinical trial, based on which the FDA authorized the vaccine for public use.
A key quote is buried on page 42: “Among 3410 total cases of suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 in the overall study population, 1594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1816 in the placebo group [who received a saltwater shot].”
Those shocking numbers have never seen the light of day in news media.
The comparative numbers reveal that the vaccine was not effective at preventing COVID-19. It was certainly not 50% more effective than a placebo shot—the standard for FDA Emergency Use Authorization.
To make all this clear, I need to back up and explain the theory of the vaccine clinical trial.
The researchers assumed the SARS-CoV-2 virus was spreading everywhere in the world, and during the clinical trial, it would descend on some volunteers.
The billion-dollar question was: how many people receiving the vaccine would become infected, vs. how many people in the placebo group?
If it turned out that FAR FEWER people getting the vaccine became infected with SARS-CoV-2, the vaccine would be hailed as a success. It protected people against the virus.
But as you can see from the numbers above, that wasn’t the case at all.
So now we come to the vital weasel-phrase in the FDA document I just quoted: “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 [cases].”
“Well, you see, we can’t say these were ACTUAL COVID-19 cases. Maybe they were, maybe they weren’t. They’re in limbo. We want to keep them in limbo. Otherwise, our clinical trial is dead in the water, and we’ll never get approval for the vaccine.”
What does “suspected cases” mean? It can only mean these people all displayed symptoms consistent with the definition of COVID-19, but they’re unconfirmed cases because…their PCR tests were negative, not positive.
However, if their tests were negative, why would they be called “suspected cases” instead of “NOT CASES”?
Something is wrong here. The FDA is hedging its bets, muddying the waters, obscuring facts.
By FDA/CDC rules, a case of COVID-19 means: a person has tested positive, period.
That’s the way cases are counted.
These thousand-plus volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial were either COVID-19 cases or they weren’t. Which is it?
The official response to that question is obvious: the FDA decided to throw the data from all those “suspected cases” in the garbage and ignore them. Poof. Gone.
Why do I say that?
Because if the FDA had paid serious attention to the “suspected cases,” they never would have authorized the vaccine for public use. They would have stopped the clinical trial and undertaken a very deep and extensive investigation.
Which they didn’t.
This is called a crime.
“But…but it’s not that simple. This is a complex situation. It’s a gray area.”
“No. It isn’t. If you were running a clinical trial of a new drug, and a few thousand people in the trial, who were given the drug, nevertheless came down with the disease symptoms the drug was supposed to cure, wouldn’t you cancel the trial and go back to the drawing board?”
“You mean if we were being honest? That’s a joke, right? We’re not honest. Don’t you get it?”
Yes. I get it. You’re criminals. Killers.
But wait. There’s more. The FDA document also states: “Suspected COVID-19 cases that occurred within 7 days after any vaccination were 409 in the vaccine group vs. 287 in the placebo group.”
That’s explosive. Right after vaccination, 409 people who received the shots became “suspected COVID cases.” This alone should have been enough to stop the clinical trial altogether. But it wasn’t.
In fact, the FDA document tries to excuse those 409 cases with a slippery comment: “It is possible that the imbalance in suspected COVID-19 cases occurring in the 7 days post vaccination represents vaccine reactogenicity with symptoms that overlap with those of COVID-19.”
Translation: You see, a number of clinical symptoms of COVID-19 and adverse effects from the vaccine are the same. Therefore, we have no idea whether the vaccinated people developed COVID or were just reacting to the vaccine. So we’re going to ignore this whole mess and pretend it’s of no importance.
Back in April of 2020, I predicted the vaccine manufacturers would use this strategy to explain away COVID cases occurring in the vaccine groups of their clinical trials.
It’s called cooking the data. It’s a way of writing off and ignoring COVID symptoms in the vaccine group.
And the FDA document, as I stated above, just puts an impenetrable cloud over all the volunteers in the Pfizer clinical trial by inventing a category called “suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases,” and throwing those crucial data away, never to be spoken of again.
I’m speaking about them now. Any sensible person, looking at them, would conclude that the vaccine should never have been authorized.
Unless fraud, deception, profits, and destruction of human life via the vaccine were and are the true goals.
Finally: When you have “suspected cases,” and their ultimate status depends on doing a test, you do the test. You do it as many times as you need to, until it registers positive or negative. Then each “suspected case” becomes an actual case or no case at all.
Perhaps these “suspected cases” in the clinical trial were tested, and many of them came up positive, revealing they were actual COVID cases—but the researchers lied and covered up the fact that they were tested.
Or if you really don’t want to know whether “suspected cases” are actual cases, you don’t test them. You leave them in a convenient limbo and park them, never to be seen again.
Either way, the situation is patently absurd. By official standards, the PCR test decides whether a person is a case or not a case. Just do the test. Saying “we don’t know” is nothing more than a con and a hustle.
I’d love to hear the researchers try to talk their way out of this one. Here is how the conversation might go:
“So you’re saying these several thousand suspected COVID cases couldn’t be adjudicated one way or another?”
“That’s right. Their PCR tests were ‘indeterminate’.”
“That says something devastating about the test itself.”
“Well, sometimes you just can’t tell whether it’s positive or negative.”
“I see. And this ‘indeterminate’ result occurred in more than a THOUSAND suspected cases.”
“I guess so, yes.”
“You know, you could have done something else with these suspected cases. A different test. You could have taken tissue samples and looked for the virus itself in a more direct way.”
“No. That wouldn’t work.”
“Why not?”
“Because…the actual virus…”
“Because no one has been able to come up with a specimen of the actual SARS-CoV-2 virus.”
“Right.”
“So tell me—what does that indicate? I’ll tell you what it indicates. You can’t prove the SARS-CoV-2 virus exists. It doesn’t exist.”
“I have to go. I’m late for a meeting.”
“You’re late for more than just a meeting. Is it true a person becomes a virologist by cutting out a coupon from the back of a comic book and mailing it to a PO Box in Maryland?’
“Absolutely not. That’s outrageous.”
“What then?”
“The PO Box is in Virginia.”
SOURCES:
“What’s happening here will happen everywhere.”