The reign in Spain has clearly gone insane.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/world/spain-holidays-mask-covid-19-beach-public-spaces-b927256.html
Author: MCM
Categories
See how many Britons WON’T submit
If you’re wondering why there’s nothing like this in the USA, remember that the turnout in DC on January 6th was something like it; but maybe you’ve forgotten it, because “our free press” scrawled over the uplifting image of that peaceful multitude with that ugly propaganda fiction of an alt-right “attempted coup.”
From EcoTextile News, a trade magazine. Has any major “news” outlet picked this up?
Please send it far and wide. Some people are, absurdly, wearing two of them, and some have their own children wearing them.
Chris Knox was moved by the rise of cancel culture to start his own podcast, which I was pleased to do.
Audio only:
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1KvqBjTmyZty6zS0N815ll?si=3ayyn7p3R8OaIBmBJQFonw
Categories
Some tweets that Twitter censored
Twitter is now a big part of our commons, like shopping malls B.C. (before COVID); so why not test the well-worn argument that private ownership allows suppression of free speech? In 1980, SCOTUS ruled in favor of some high school students who had been leafleting inside a mall in Campbell, California, until security guards told them to leave, because they hadn’t sought permission from the owners.
In Pruneyard v. Robins, the court unanimously upheld the ruling of California’s Supreme Court: that, under California’s constitution, citizens may exercise their free speech rights in private shopping centers open to the public. It was a controversial decision, which moved Colorado, Massachusetts and New Jersey, as well as Puerto Rico, to follow California’s lead, while 13 other states refused to do so, as did the UK.
With Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and YouTube (i.e., Google) all vigorously policing what we say, and blocking, or deleting, dissident opinion, and inconvenient data and/or news, as openly, and sweepingly, as the CCP controls the Internet in China, the time has come to study Pruneyard for its relevance to cyber-space, as some legal minds have done: “In this new world,” writes James D. Barger in SciTech Lawyer, “long-established property law and state constitutions may provide the best protection for a user’s right to express himself in sometimes controversial ways.”
http://delawarevalleylawyer.com/sites/DVL/SciTech_Speech-in-Virtual-Worlds-Barger-Summer2010.pdf
Could that argument get any legal/constitutional traction? If so, let’s see how we might make that happen. If not, let’s think of other ways to make the case that all this arbitrary censorship is unacceptable; for this vast crackdown is an existential danger to our nominal democracy, our freedom and our very lives—so something must be done about it, now.
That Jack Dorsey and his minions know jack-sh*t about this issue, about which Martin Kulldorf knows a lot, tells us that they blacked out his argument, not because they know it to be wrong, but because it contradicts the propaganda anthem that the Mighty Wurlitzeris playing now: i.e., that (apologies to Bob Dylan) everybody must get jabbed.
Thus, three days ago, the New York Times ran “We Can’t End the Pandemic Without Vaccinating Kids,” an op ed by Dr. Jeremy Samuel Faust (!) at Brigham and Women’s Health Hospital, and Dr. Angela L. Rasmussen at the Global Health Science and Security at Georgetown University Medical Center. That both those institutions have, these last few years, been granted many millions by the Gates Foundation may bear some relation to the authors’ urgent warning that we won’t see the end of this “pandemic” (unlike every other one in human history) until all the children on the planet (notwithstanding their strong natural immunity, and the fact that there is no known instance of a child transmitting SARS-CoV-2 to anybody else) are injected with one of those experimental “vaccines” now. Of the two, Dr. Faust has been especially active as a propagandist for the COVID jabs, despite their obvious riskiness (which, Fauci-like, he waves away as based on merely “anecdotal” evidence), suggesting that, much like that other Dr. Faust, this one has made a big deal with the devil.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/29/opinion/covid-vaccines-kids.html
And while the Gray Lady has, as usual, sung this latest propaganda anthem loud and clear, so are we now hearing it out on “the left.” “Unless we vaccinate the world,” warns Greg Gonsalves, an epidemiologist at Yale, as quoted in the now pro-lockdown Consortium News, “we leave the playing field open to more and more mutations, which could churn out variants that could evade our current vaccines and require booster shots to deal with them.” While such hypothetical mutations “could” conceivably give rise to “variants” that “could” be unaffected by what Dr. Gonsalves wrongly calls “our current vaccines,” his crackpot call to “vaccinate the world” with (say) Pfizer’s non-vaccine could be motivated less by a commitment to his Hippocratic Oath than by his ties to (say) the immense Yale-Pfizer “research alliance” that began, at great expense, in 2002.
https://consortiumnews.com/2021/03/31/covid-19-experts-warn-of-failing-to-rapidly-vaccinate-the-world-creating-dangerous-opening-for-virus/
https://medicine.yale.edu/news/medicineatyale/pfizer-and-yale-join-forces-for-research-and/
That Twitter’s censorship of Dr. Kulldorf helped to clear the field of any credible dissent from the extremist program pushed by Drs. Faust, Rasmussen and Gonsalves, and by all the other media promoting it, with still other doctors whoring for it, tells us that “our free press,” including most of what we (wrongly) call the “social media,” is neither free, nor does it any longer function as a press, as it is now a tightly managed propaganda juggernaut, its purpose not to tell us what we need to know, so that we might protect our lives, and liberty, and seek our happiness: on the contrary. Today, its purpose is precisely to keep just such knowledge from us, so that we’ll do and think exactly as we’re told, by powers intent on lessening our numbers, keeping us in line, and having us believe that we’ll be happier than ever, once they’ve taken everything we have.
If you can find a headline as deranged as this one, I would love to see it.
How could you not believe a man with such an honest face?