Skip to the content
The document they take us through appears to be authentic, and adds up, while they themselves are wholly rational; and their key point—that we CAN stop it all, if we just face the truth, and ACT, instead of cowering, or going back to sleep—is indisputable.
Please watch and share.
MCM
Saskatchewan document corroborated :
https://sun-nurses.sk.ca/covid-19/covid-19-lou-and-ministers-order
And we certainly cannot have THAT!
Let’s face it: the “scientists” well-funded to promote the “climate change” agenda—like those who’ve pushed the global COVID panic—are all at the service of the globalist elite intent on endless LOCKDOWN.
Reposted from the NoTricksZone
By Kenneth Richard on 30. September 2021
Back in 2009 the Climategate e-mails provided written documentation affirming suspicions climate scientists inclined to activism seek to “oust” those who they suspect might be in the “greenhouse skeptics camp” from participating in a scientific journal’s peer-review process.
Further, they would even “redefine what the peer-review literature is” if that’s what it would take to prevent heretical papers from being referenced in IPCC reports.
Image Source: Lowe, 2009
The scientific literature says CO2 changes lag paleoclimate temperature changes
A few months ago we highlighted a peer-reviewed scientific paper about the logical contradiction of a perceived CO2-induced paleoclimate record even though ice cores overwhelmingly support the conclusion temperature changes precede changes in CO2 by hundreds to thousands of years.
Image Source: Richet, 2021
That the ice core record clearly affirms this sequencing (CO2 changes occur at least centuries after temperatures change) is not even controversial. Just a few of the many observational studies supporting the temperature-leads-CO2 ordering include Mudelsee, 2001, Fischer et al., 1999, Monnin et al., 2001, Schneider et al., 2013, Stott et al., 2007, and Shin et al., 2020.
The Copernicus Gatekeepers of Truth
After likely receiving heavy criticism from climate activists for daring to publish a “skeptic” paper in their journal, the Gatekeepers of Truth at Copernicus then “decided” this paper was not sufficiently reviewed by those who reject papers that do not align with the anthropogenic global warming narrative.
Two reasons Copernicus offers for post-reviewing an already published paper stand out:
“The topic and conclusions of the manuscript are highly controversial due to their political and social implications, a fact that author, editor, and referees were aware of, as evident from email records, the manuscript’s cover letter, and referee reports.”
“6 [of the reviewers invited to referee the paper] are publicly known as being in favour of or having ties to an industry benefiting from the manuscript’s conclusion.”
So the author was aware that his paper was “highly controversial” and had “political ad social” implications, and yet he had the audacity to seek publication in their journal anyway. What an odd criticism this is.
While offering no scientific justification for doing so, questioning the background and suspected political affiliations of reviewers is apparently deemed sufficient to disqualify them from reviewing manuscripts. Nowhere do the “acceptable” referees tackle the logical lead-lag cause-effect problem in paleoclimate science. At Copernicus, the science is apparently less important than the occupational and political affiliations of those reviewing manuscripts.
Predetermined rejection
In June and July, new reviewers who were selected by Copernicus because they were predisposed to reject the already-published paper merged their criticism of Richet’s paper into a single document here.
By late August to early September, the foregone conclusion had been realized. Dr. Richet’s paper questioning why it is assumed CO2 drives the present climate changes when it can be demonstrated CO2 did not drive climate change in the ice core record, was rejected.
Dr. Richet: “Should IPCC-revolving scientists be the only holders of truth?”
Dr. Richet wrote a reply to the Copernicus Gatekeepers of Truth who rejected his paper after it had been published. As an Earth scientist (geochemist and thermodynamicist) commenting on the CO2 ice core data, he is claimed to have improperly benefitted from a too-friendly peer-review process because 3 of the reviewers allegedly “have ties to industry benefitting from the manuscript conclusions.” (What “benefit” this is remains unspecified.)
Richet rightly points out that those criticizing his conclusions about the ice core data contradicting the CO2-drives-climate narrative likely have at least indirect ties to the $89 trillion dollars of climate-related “green” industries that necessarily must be spent (2015-2030) to transition to CO2 emission mitigation in the coming decades.
Regarding the disqualification of reviewers with ties to industries allegedly benefitting from the manuscript’s publication, Richet notes that Copernicus, the man, was Church administrator who never published on astronomy until later in his non-scientific career.
Importantly, none of Richet’s opponents were able to refute the central claim that “the interpretation of ice-core results flatly contradicts the fundamental principles of scientific reasoning.”
Finally, Richet asks why it is that only those scientists who align their views with that of the UN IPCC are allowed to decide on matters of “truth” in climate science.
Of course, this question will remain unanswered.
Image Source: Copernicus
Propaganda lies while blacking out the truth.
For example, check out this headline in Forbes, asserting an imaginary “lack of scientific evidence” that Ivermectin is effective as a Covid-19 remedy:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/10/02/bill-maher-defends-ivermectin-despite-lack-of-scientific-evidence-as-covid-19-treatment/?sh=50f120d604a8
Then read the piece below, on how India has successfully used Ivermectin as a Covid-19 remedy—one piece of many out there on a story that “our free press” WILL NOT report, because our “press” obediently blacks out any news that contradicts the propaganda that they ceaselessly pump out. (That’s why they have also not reportedmed the successful use of Ivermectin in Peru and El Salvador, among other places.)
“Each home kit contained the following: Paracetamol tablets [tylenol], Vitamin C, Multivitamin, Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin 12 mg [quantity #10 tablets], Doxycycline 100 mg [quantity #10 tablets]. Other non-medication components included face masks, sanitizer, gloves and alcohol wipes, a digital thermometer, and a pulse oximeter.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout-secret-revealed
Propaganda lies while blacking out the truth.
For example, check out this headline in Forbes, asserting an imaginary “lack of scientific evidence” that Ivermectin is effective as a Covid-19 remedy:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2021/10/02/bill-maher-defends-ivermectin-despite-lack-of-scientific-evidence-as-covid-19-treatment/?sh=50f120d604a8
Then read the piece below, on how India has successfully used Ivermectin as a Covid-19 remedy—one piece of many out there on a story that “our free press” WILL NOT report, because our “press” obediently blacks out any news that contradicts the propaganda that they ceaselessly pump out. (That’s why they have also not reportedmed the successful use of Ivermectin in Peru and El Salvador, among other places.)
“Each home kit contained the following: Paracetamol tablets [tylenol], Vitamin C, Multivitamin, Zinc, Vitamin D3, Ivermectin 12 mg [quantity #10 tablets], Doxycycline 100 mg [quantity #10 tablets]. Other non-medication components included face masks, sanitizer, gloves and alcohol wipes, a digital thermometer, and a pulse oximeter.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/indias-ivermectin-blackout-secret-revealed
Still an open question. Civil disagreement welcomed.
https://planetwaves.fm/worldwide-hunt-for-sars-cov-2/Tonight’s season premier of Planet Waves FM features an interview with Christine Massey, who has coordinated the worldwide search for any record if purified or isolated samples of SARS-CoV-2. She has compiled responses from 107 different state, provincial and national governments, as well as institutions and organizations around the world.
None have any record of proof of existence of the alleged virus, which would be necessary before it could be shown to be harmful, or sequenced sufficiently to develop a PCR assay. The PCR can only find something if it has some of it already. Christine’s work is the other half of what I have been doing demonstrating that the PCR for SARS-CoV-2 has never been validated because there is no sequence available.
Could well be. Never mind.
MCM
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Saturday, October 2nd, 2021 at 3:57 PM, Julie Desnick <> wrote:
It says in the comments below the video that it is fake. The people are cheering at soccer and someone photoshopped the image on the screen to the resignation!
Julie
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:24 PM Mark Crispin Miller (via nfu list) <nfu@simplelists.com> wrote:
https://twitter.com/Kukicat7/status/1444015782342627368
From Mike Bird:
If you come across any Canadian content related to this, please let us know.
Best,
Mike
On Oct 2, 2021, at 11:23 AM, Mark Crispin Miller (via nfu list) <nfu@simplelists.com> wrote:
Something else that left and right alike don’t get.
https://rokfin.com/post/54665
![https://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Climategate-e-mails-peer-review-journal-editors-ousted-hide-the-decline.jpg”](https://notrickszone.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Climategate-e-mails-peer-review-journal-editors-ousted-hide-the-decline.jpg"){kind=link}
