Why is Rachael Maddow getting paid so much to kill her viewers?

MSNBC recently announced that they’ll be paying her $30 million a year:

That’s how much she must be worth to MSNBC—which is to say, Big Pharma—for all her efforts to keep people in the dark about the benefits of Ivermectin, which, if they were properly informed, they would be taking prophylactically instead of getting jabbed with the “vaccines” that Maddow sells, in one way or another, night after night. 

That’s what MSNBC is paying her to do, as Diane Perlman tells her in this open letter.

Shame, everlasting shame, on her and them. 


Open Letter and Challenge for Rachel Maddow
Ivermectin: Truth or Consequences

Diane Perlman
Diane Perlman

Just now·18 min read


Dear Rachel,

I used to watch your show religiously, having followed you for years. I remember you on Air America and watched your first MSNBC show, I believe on your grandmother’s birthday. You are brilliant, know how to investigate deeply and connect dots. You are an amazing teacher and educate my family members on current events.
I am a psychologist, with a former practice in psychoneuroimmunology, studying exceptional physical healing, and a political psychologist analyzing psychological dynamics in politics, psychological manipulation of fear, nuclear proliferation, demystification, and conflict transformation. I moved to DC to be near think tanks and do more good. We have a mutual friend, Steve Clemons.
A few months ago, I stopped watching cable news because I could no longer tolerate the condescending, contemptuous tone. I had been analyzing dynamics, mostly MSNBC, plus some CNN and FOX. I tuned in to your show again on August 20 because my sister told me that your reporting was amazing.
I experience you as a decent, ethical person with integrity, but am troubled by some reporting that succumbs to corporate influenced groupthink. We need smart analysts like you to challenge and demystify seductive, inflammatory, harmful, mindsets.
I debate with friends about whether you indeed have integrity and would revise your opinion upon a deep investigation of independent, accurate scientific information, or whether you are beholden to your Big Pharma sponsors’ conflicts of interests that promote false information which endangers the public. Big Pharma is by far the biggest US lobby, more than double Big Oil.
I was beyond shocked at your August 20 segment with false, misleading information on Ivermectin that discourages the use of this life-saving drug, thus allowing unnecessary suffering and death while attributing its use to a Republican agenda.
Since completing this article I saw your August 27 segment,
Anyone who reads the links and listens to testimonies in this article first and then listens your segment will get a lesson in propaganda. My apologies for this Rachel. I think you believe that what you are saying is true.

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is 1*2Mf2fVwMeS00Enc1phrHKQ.jpeg

Photo by the the Author
You suggested that
· Ivermectin (IVM) was only a horse de-wormer
· IVM and Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) have no studies showing they work
· One IVM study was withdrawn because data was faked and plagiarized
· IVM and HCQ are snake oil, mainly promoted by Fox and Trump, insinuating that people who use them are stupid, crazy, and Republican
· the FDA NIH, WHO, and Merck advises against IVM. True, but why?
I will fact-check these after presenting irrefutable facts about IVM.
For brevity and flow, there are links throughout and detailed scientific information at the end to establish impeccable credibility and to share. Most people have not seen this highly censored information and are mimicking scripted propaganda to doctors and patients, including several of my loved ones.

Click on the link for the rest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.