From Gerard Boersma:
Dear Mark,
Recently a group of top experts (with some major names) peer-reviewed the Corman-Drosten paper, which has served as the basis for most PCR tests.
The scientists discovered at least ten “major scientific flaws,” and deem the paper to be rubbish. They filed a retraction request at Eurosurveillance. This, of course, should have major consequences for the worldwide use of PCR tests.
The review is here:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/Gerard Boersma
3 replies on “Top experts find 10 “major scientific flaws” in the Corman-Drosten paper—the basis for the worldwide use of PCR tests—and have called for its retraction”
Continue too teach, publish, Mark Crispin Miller!
This response finds the critique not so devastating and definitive. Some of the signers have curious backgrounds
https://www.pepijnvanerp.nl/2020/12/some-considerations-on-the-retraction-paper-for-the-corman-drosten-pcr-test/
@ Harry Clark: Ad hominem. Van Erp himself is a dubious figure (ad hominem right back).
On the true topic of the retraction issues and scientific flaws: dr. Pieter Borger has successfully countered the so-called debunks from Van Erp on twitter.