Categories
NFU

Top experts find 10 “major scientific flaws” in the Corman-Drosten paper—the basis for the worldwide use of PCR tests—and have called for its retraction

From Gerard Boersma:

Dear Mark,

Recently a group of top experts (with some major names) peer-reviewed the Corman-Drosten paper, which has served as the basis for most PCR tests.

The scientists discovered at least ten “major scientific flaws,” and deem the paper to be rubbish. They filed a retraction request at Eurosurveillance. This, of course, should have major consequences for the worldwide use of PCR tests.

The review is here:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

Gerard Boersma

3 replies on “Top experts find 10 “major scientific flaws” in the Corman-Drosten paper—the basis for the worldwide use of PCR tests—and have called for its retraction”

@ Harry Clark: Ad hominem. Van Erp himself is a dubious figure (ad hominem right back).

On the true topic of the retraction issues and scientific flaws: dr. Pieter Borger has successfully countered the so-called debunks from Van Erp on twitter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.