Categories
NFU

“Our free press” squeals with joy over Merck’s iffy and unnecessary Molnupiravir, based on one tiny, preliminary study

… whereas they’ve avidly pooh-poohed HCQ and Ivermectin as early treatments for COVID-19, although the safety and effectiveness of both those drugs is amply documented.

All of them hookers.

MCM

The Extraordinary Hypocrisy of Molnupiravir

The Representation of Merck’s Molnupiravir as a “Game Changer” Only Underscores a Bias – And Merck Has Other Data It Is Not Sharing

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/the-extraordinary-hypocrisy-of-molnupiravir

Trigger alert: This article may upset those who care about other human beings.

Molnupiravir (mull-noo-’peer-aveer) is the talk of the town, belle of the ball in the press. “Game changer” is the word on the street, according to a message to Science Insider:

“Molnupiravir is unquestionably a game changer! The large effect size, and the ease of administration change the paradigm of mild COVID-19 treatment with a potential to reduce COVID-19 death rates.” See: Science Magazine

The hype even included Fauci going on in an interview about how the idea that molnupiravir is so effective that the vaccine won’ t be needed.


Click on the link for the rest.

Categories
NFU

“Unvaccinated” anesthesiologist “escorted” from UCLA medical facility, placed on unpaid leave

https://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2021/10/07/willing-to-lose-everything-unvaccinated-anesthesiologist-escorted-ucla-medical-facility-placed-on-unpaid-leave/

Categories
NFU

2019 CSPAN video shows Fauci et al. on how to FORCE mRNA “vaccine” on ALL

https://www.bitchute.com/video/zNCYFYergHqB/

Categories
NFU

France introduces bill mandating “vaccination” FOR ALL, starting Jan. 1

https://theexpose.uk/2021/10/07/france-introduces-bill-to-mandate-covid-19-vaccines-for-all-from-january-1st-2022/

Categories
NFU

Israeli data favor higher estimates of post-“vax” myocarditis (reported by vax-happy Medpage Today)

Israeli Data Favor Higher Estimates of Post-Vax Myocarditis
— Results echo the controversial VAERS study from September

by Nicole Lou, Staff Writer, MedPage Today  October 6, 2021


https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19vaccine/94892?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2021-10-07&eun=g1402931d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily%20Headlines%20Top%20Cat%20HeC%20%202021-10-07&utm_term=NL_Daily_DHE_dual-gmail-definition

The incidence of myocarditis after receipt of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was several times higher in two reports from Israel compared with some estimates, but remained low through the late spring of this year.

For patients in Israel’s largest healthcare system, Clalit Health Services, the estimate of myocarditis was 2.13 cases per 100,000 vaccinated persons, reaching as high as 10.69 cases per 100,000 in men and boys ages 16 to 29.

A separate study using Israel’s government database, capturing active and passive periods of surveillance for myocarditis, supported the higher risk in young men. In this report, males of all ages had myocarditis occur at 0.64 cases per 100,000 persons after the first dose and 3.83 cases per 100,000 after the second dose — with the incidence increasing to 1.34 and 15.07 per 100,000 after the first and second doses, respectively, for teenage boys ages 16 to 19.

Both papers were published online in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Differences in methodology — how myocarditis cases were counted and how far out from mRNA vaccination they would have to be to be considered post-vaccination cases — may account for the different estimates between the two studies.

These differences may also explain why these latest myocarditis estimates greatly exceed those from the CDC and a California health system. Notably, they are relatively closer to estimates in a controversial preprint study that had suggested post-vaccination myocarditis rates of 162 per million (16.2 per 100,000) in boys ages 12 to 15 and 94 per million (9.4 per 100,000) in boys ages 16 to 17 based on Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data.

In line with prior observations, the Israeli studies showed that the risk of post-vaccination myocarditis was greatest within a week after the second vaccine dose. Although cases were largely mild, there were deaths in these two reports.

Nevertheless, the latest data do not negate the previous finding that myocarditis is more common after SARS-CoV-2 infection than after vaccination.

Myocarditis in a Large Health System

The first Israeli study of the Clalit health system used electronic health record (EHR) data and cardiologist adjudication of these records.

Investigators counted 54 myocarditis cases within 42 days of receipt of a first dose of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine from Dec. 20, 2020 through May 24, 2021. The incidence of such inflammation varied according to age and sex.

  • Overall population: 2.13 cases per 100,000 persons
  • Men and boys: 4.12 per 100,000
  • Women and girls: 0.23 per 100,000
  • Young people ages 16 to 29: 5.49 per 100,000
  • Men and boys ages 16 to 29: 10.69 per 100,000
  • Individuals age 30 or older: 1.13 per 100,000

Of the 54 myocarditis cases, 41 were deemed mild and 12 were of intermediate severity. One person suffered cardiogenic shock that led to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, according to a group led by Guy Witberg, MD, of Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital in Petah Tikva.

Follow-up lasted a median 83 days after myocarditis onset, during which one person with pre-existing cardiac disease died from an unspecified cause the day after discharge, and another with a history of pericarditis was readmitted to the hospital three times for recurrence (with no further myocardial involvement after the index hospitalization).

Witberg’s group counted more than 2.5 million Clalit patients who had received at least one dose of the Pfizer vaccine during the study period.

For cases identified from EHRs with enough data to satisfy CDC diagnostic criteria for myocarditis, cardiologists were brought in for adjudication. No biopsy was required for diagnosis.

The 54 people determined to have post-vaccination myocarditis had a median age of 27 years, and 94% were men. Two of them had contracted COVID-19 before vaccination.

A diagnosis of myocarditis occurred after the second mRNA vaccine dose in 69% of cases, with a median 21 days between the two doses.

Witberg and colleagues cautioned that the short follow-up in their report prevented them from drawing conclusions about the long-term prognosis of people with post-vaccination myocarditis. Furthermore, they couldn’t count cases from out-of-network hospitals where patients may have received care for myocarditis.

More Cases in a Government Database

In a separate study using a longer follow-up period, the Israeli government reported 136 definitive or probable cases of myocarditis across the country within 21 days after the first Pfizer dose and 30 days after the second dose.

Researchers led by Sharon Alroy-Preis, MD, MPH, of the Israeli Ministry of Health, calculated the incidence of myocarditis between the two mRNA vaccine doses.

  • All men and boys: 0.64 cases per 100,000 persons after the first dose vs 3.83 per 100,000 persons after the second dose
  • Males ages 16 to 19: 1.34 vs 15.07 per 100,000 persons
  • Males ages 20 to 24: 1.91 vs 10.86 per 100,000 persons
  • Males ages 25 to 29: 1.22 vs 6.99 per 100,000 persons
  • Males ages 30 to 39: 0.41 vs 3.69 per 100,000 persons
  • All women and girls: 0.07 vs 0.46 per 100,000 persons

Compared with historical data from 2017 to 2019, myocarditis was more than five times as likely after mRNA vaccination in the overall population. Compared with people who remained unvaccinated during the study period (from Dec. 20, 2020, to May 31, 2021), fully vaccinated individuals had about double the risk at 30 days after the second dose.

“The incidence of myocarditis declined as the number of newly vaccinated persons decreased over time. This finding was suggestive of a possible causal relationship between two doses of the vaccine and the risk of myocarditis,” wrote Alroy-Preis and colleagues.

People who had post-vaccination myocarditis had mild symptoms in 95% of cases. One person with fulminant myocarditis, a 22-year-old presenting with high elevated troponin T, died within 24 hours of receiving a myocarditis diagnosis.

Israel’s Ministry of Health had initiated active surveillance of post-vaccination myocarditis in February, requesting that all hospitals report cases of myocarditis going back to as early as December 2020.

“Since persons with suspected myocarditis are almost always hospitalized in Israel, such surveillance data should approximate all cases of myocarditis during the period of active surveillance,” the study authors noted.

They opted to use the Brighton Collaboration criteria in the diagnosis of myocarditis among the 9.2 million Israeli residents vaccinated with at least one dose during the surveillance period.

Of the 136 cases of myocarditis, 95 were accompanied by sex and age data; 91% were male, and 76% were under the age of 30. Patients presented after the first vaccine dose in 19 cases and after the second dose in 117.

Like Witberg’s group, Alroy-Preis and colleagues acknowledged that they did not validate myocarditis cases with biopsies. Their study design also left room for ascertainment bias and confounding.

Categories
NFU

Biden held a COVID-19 “Global Summit” (all about “vaccines”), and most countries stayed away

This happened two weeks ago. No surprise that “our free press” ignored it.

MCM

General boycott of Covid-19 Global Summit

VOLTAIRE NETWORK | 24 SEPTEMBER 2021

boycott of Biden’s Covid-19 Global Summit

On 22 September 2021, President Joe Biden held a virtual Global Summit on Covid-19 on the sidelines of the 76th United Nations General Assembly.

He had predicted the presence of at least 100 states and 100 organizations. In fact, only a handful of developed countries allied to the United States plus a number of assorted organizations showed up.

President Biden has pledged to distribute an additional 500 million doses of vaccines to ensure that 70% of the population in every country is fully vaccinated.

The announcement is baffling considering that Washington did not fulfill its earlier promise to deliver 160 million doses on time, and that the price of these vaccines has since skyrocketed. It is therefore not clear how he intends to finance this effort, having failed to do so when it was much cheaper. Often, in those countries that cannot afford to pay for these products, less than 1% of the population has been vaccinated. It will therefore be particularly difficult for them to fight against the pandemic if they stay on this course.

The massive absence at this summit of countries that should be the primary beneficiaries of this program speaks volumes about their mistrust of both US commitments and the vaccine strategy. Many have already turned to Russia and China for other solutions, especially knowing that, at home, the all-out vaccine strategy championed by the United States has yielded catastrophic results, with deaths per million people over 25 times higher than in China.

This is the first time that a meeting organized by the United States to hand out donations has been boycotted by potential recipients.


Click on the link for the rest.

Categories
NFU

New Lancet study confirms plummeting “vaccine” effectiveness

From Richard M. Rosenthal:

Science:

The decline in vaccine effectiveness in England was confirmed last week in a new Government-funded study (not yet peer-reviewed), which found that the reduction in transmission “declined over time since second vaccination, for Delta reaching similar levels to unvaccinated individuals by 12 weeks for [the AstraZeneca vaccine] and attenuating substantially for [Pfizer]”. In other words, within just three months AstraZeneca did nothing to prevent transmission, and Pfizer was scarcely better.
https://dailysceptic.org/2021/10/06/new-lancet-study-confirms-plummeting-vaccine-effectiveness/

New Lancet Study Confirms Plummeting Vaccine Effectiveness

A study appeared in the Lancet this week confirming that vaccine effectiveness against infection is fading fast. (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)02183-8/fulltext)

The study involved 3,436,957 people over the age of 12 who are members of the healthcare organisation Kaiser Permanente Southern California. It sought to assess the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19-related hospital admissions for up to six months, with a study period covering December 14th, 2020, to August 8th, 2021. 

Comparing fully vaccinated to unvaccinated, and controlling for confounders such as prior infection, the researchers found that effectiveness against infection plummeted from 88% (95% confidence interval 86-89%) during the first month after double-vaccination to 47% (43-51%) after five months. The variation by age (depicted above) was largely within the margins of error.

Among sequenced infections, the researchers found vaccine effectiveness against Delta infection was 93% (85-97%) during the first month after double-vaccination but dropped to 53% (39-65%) after four months. Effectiveness against infection from other variants the first month after double-vaccination was 97% (95-99%), but declined to 67% (45-80%) at 4-5 months. 

Vaccine effectiveness against hospital admissions for Delta infection held up at around 93% (84-96%) for the six months across all ages. 



However, the researchers note that the latest data from Israel “suggests that some reduction in effectiveness against hospital admissions has been observed among older people (65 years and over) roughly six months after receiving the second dose of [Pfizer]”.

One question that’s arisen recently is to what extent vaccine effectiveness estimates are affected by whether more people who have been previously infected decide not to be vaccinated. According to this study the answer is: not very much at all. Among the unvaccinated, 2.3% had one or more previous positive PCR tests, only slightly more than the 2% of the double-vaccinated who did.

Number and percentage of individuals with one or more previous positive PCR tests

It’s also worth noting that although this study adjusts its raw estimates for no fewer than 22 potential confounding variables, the adjusted figures differ very little from the unadjusted figures in almost all cases. This suggests that unadjusted estimates from large population samples are often a fair approximation in the absence of sophisticated statistical analysis.

Given that the adjusted figures were little different to the unadjusted figures, however, it’s not immediately clear why the vaccine effectiveness estimates in this study, while low and declining, are so much higher than the latest unadjusted estimates derived from Public Health England data (namely, negative vaccine effectiveness in the over-40s, including minus-66% in those in their 40s). It doesn’t appear to be merely a matter of additional time elapsing, as most people in the U.K. weren’t double vaccinated until April, May or June, meaning only four or five months have elapsed until September, the same time period as in the study. 

Could it be because the study period ended on August 8th, when the Delta surge in California was just getting going (see below)?

In the U.K. the vaccine effectiveness didn’t plunge until the second half of the Delta surge, the first part being dominated by infections in the unvaccinated (for reasons still not entirely clear). Did the new study finish too early to see the dramatic effect we’ve seen in England?

The authors say their study indicates that the decline in vaccine effectiveness is primarily a function of time rather than variant-related. However, the evidence from England would suggest otherwise, as in the same period of time, but later in the Delta surge, the decline has been far greater.

The decline in vaccine effectiveness in England was confirmed last week in a new Government-funded study (not yet peer-reviewed), which found that the reduction in transmission “declined over time since second vaccination, for Delta reaching similar levels to unvaccinated individuals by 12 weeks for [the AstraZeneca vaccine] and attenuating substantially for [Pfizer]”. In other words, within just three months AstraZeneca did nothing to prevent transmission, and Pfizer was scarcely better.

One of the main recommendations of the authors of both studies in light of their findings is for regular booster jabs – in the case of the first, where many of the authors are employees of and investors in Pfizer, this may be deemed hardly surprising. However, if effectiveness against serious disease is holding up, why give people boosters just to stop them getting and spreading what is effectively a cold, and which bestows more robust immunity as it goes? Furthermore, if the effectiveness declines after as little as three months, is it even possible to deliver enough boosters to have any impact on infection and transmission? Would it not be much better to say that the vaccines, by offering personal protection from serious disease to those who want it, have done their job? Better to move on and abandon any ideas of vaccine passports and mandates and boosters, and in general the now almost wholly pointless obsession with Covid vaccines.


By Will Jones  /  6 October 2021 • 07.00

Read more from the Daily Sceptic:
Public Health England The Lancet Vaccine efficacy Vaccine Passports Vaccines

Categories
NFU

A powerful meeting of Vaxaholics Anonymous (AUDIO)

From Eric Coppolino:


https://planetwaves.fm/a-meeting-of-vaxaholics-anonymous

Categories
NFU

Jacobin, “leading voice of the American left,” runs Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s attack on Kyrie Irving for refusing “vaccination”


Kareem Abdul-Jabbar vs Kyrie Irving on vaccine refusal

NBA legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar writes for Jacobin:

After Golden State Warriors’ Andrew Wiggins received criticism for refusing to get the COVID-19 vaccine for personal reasons, his teammate Draymond Green said the public needs to “honor” that decision: “There is something to be said for people’s concerns about something that’s being pressed so hard,” he stated. “Why are you pressing this so hard? You have to honor people’s feelings and their own personal beliefs.”

Wiggins has since received the vaccine, though he made clear that it was under financial duress. Other than vague claims about “freedom,” he’s never offered rational support for his stance.

Neither has Brooklyn Nets point guard Kyrie Irving, who continues to reject the expertise of prominent immunologists without reason, contributing to vaccine hesitancy among people in the Black community, who are dying at twice the rate of white people. His lack of regard for Black lives doesn’t deserve acceptance, nor does his lack of regard for the health and welfare of the NBA community.

Read more

Categories
NFU

Watch out for Harry, Gina and Carolina! The health freedom movement has (of course) been infiltrated

It looks like America’s Frontline Doctors has been compromised.


https://ccsfreedom.org/