Thus the mask mandates are now clearly symptomatic of mass mental retardation.
Author: MCM
EXCLUSIVE: COVID vaccine-injured whistleblowers speak out Thursday, August 26
In response to failure by our federal government, the Arizona-based Truth for Health Foundation, is announcing on Thursday, August 26, that it has convened a Citizens Vaccine Safety Review Board,
NEWS
Tue Aug 24, 2021 – 2:52 pm EDT
TUSCON, AZ –– This week’s FDA “approval” of the first COVID shot was done without convening an Advisory Committee, without public comment, and without reporting to the public on safety data from the national Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
In response to this failure by our federal government, the Arizona-based Truth for Health Foundation, a 501(c)(3) public charity, is announcing on Thursday, August 26, that it has convened a Citizens Vaccine Safety Review Board, chaired by Dr. Peter McCullough, the Foundation’s Chief Medical Advisor, and Dr. Paul Alexander, the Foundation’s Director of Evidence-based Medicine, both of whom are clinical epidemiologists and international experts, with extensive FA Drug Safety Monitoring experience. The Citizens Vaccine Safety Review Board will analyze US and international data on vaccine deaths, medical complications, and injuries, and then report these findings directly to the public.
Click on the link for the rest.
America in an Age of Faucism
by David Penner / August 22nd, 2021
https://dissidentvoice.org/2021/08/america-in-an-age-of-faucism/
Reason can wrestle and overthrow terror.
— Euripides, Iphigenia in Aulis
Medical ethics in the West has long been predicated on informed consent, the oath to do no harm, the notion that good health care is a human right, and the search for scientific truth free from skullduggery and censorship. These tenets are not only integral to a sound health care system but are foundational to a civilized society. Lamentably, each of these sacrosanct principles is anathema to the medical industrial complex. For we have entered the Age of Faucism.
In “Why do patients hate going to the doctor?” by Maheswari Raja, MD, the author reiterates the establishment medical narrative, that there is nothing fundamentally wrong with our health care system, and that the problem is the American patient:
And the truth is that the doctor’s office is an uncomfortable place. It is where one answers the most intimate questions and speaks their most intimate fears — where they have to face the reality of the consequences of their behaviors and misjudgments.
Will physicians devoid of a moral compass, the private health insurance companies, and the pharmaceutical industry ever face the consequences of their “behaviors and misjudgments?” No less delusional and absurd, Dana Hassneiah, MD, writes in KevinMD:
Most people in other jobs would probably not care to help a person who is indifferent and doesn’t want to help himself. But in medicine, your knowledge and morals make you the desperate person in the encounter.
These superior morals were on display in the Covid vaccine propaganda video where doctors tell patients to “Just grow the f**k up and get the vaccine,” an obscenity emblematic of the growing push towards severing ties with the Hippocratic Oath.
Embedded in Faucism are three cults: the Cult of Psychiatry, the Church of Vaccinology, and the Branch Covidians. These branches of American pseudo-medicine inhabit a world of authoritarianism, zealotry, and unreason, and are anchored in a deep-seated contempt for informed consent and the oath to do no harm. Just as Europeans who were suspected of deviating from a once supremely powerful church were labeled heretics, necromancers, and accused of witchcraft and sorcery, those that have the temerity to question the pharmaceutical priesthood are denounced as “conspiracy theorists,” “anti-vax,” and “anti-science.” Whether it be Wahhabism, the Cultural Revolution in China, the Nazis, or the Christian fundamentalists of 16th and 17th century Europe, tyranny needs a dogma, and the rapacious corporatization of medicine coupled with the neoliberal belief in the infallibility of the liberal media have spawned Faucism.
Click on the link for the rest.
“Based on this data it all but a certainty that mass COVID-19 immunization is hurting the health of the population in general.Scientific principles dictate that the mass immunization with COVID-19 vaccines must be halted immediately because we face a looming vaccine induced public health catastrophe.”
https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific–1811.pdf
From Aug. 7.
https://www.aier.org/article/prominent-law-professor-sues-his-school-over-vaccine-policy/
Prominent Law Professor Sues His School Over Vaccine Policy
Ethan Yang
–August 7, 2021 Reading Time: 5 minutes
Imposing a constitutionally dubious vaccine policy at a public university that not only has some of the top classical liberal law professors in the country but is also intimately connected with a global network of freedom advocates is a recipe for a lawsuit. That’s exactly what George Mason University learned recently when it imposed a school-wide vaccine mandate for students, faculty, and staff. Failure to comply subjects individuals to a list of penalties from social distancing requirements to potential disciplinary action.
The plaintiff is Todd Zywicki, the George Mason University Foundation Professor of Law, who has as impressive of a resume as anyone can imagine. He has held positions at numerous influential think tanks, executive positions in the federal government, and has taught at numerous respected law schools. His lawsuit is joined by the New Civil Liberties Alliance, a non-profit law firm dedicated to advancing constitutional freedoms and founded by the prominent legal scholar Philip Hamburger. AIER contributor Jenin Younes is also a member of their litigation team and one of the attorneys on this case.
Zywicki names the president of the school and numerous other officers as the defendants in his suit Zywicki v Washington. He alleges that as a public institution, GMU is obligated to follow the Constitution and its vaccine policy violates the 9th and 14th Amendments as well as the Supremacy Clause. Zywicki contends that his natural immunity from having recovered from a natural Covid-19 infection gives him equal if not superior protection than vaccines. His sentiments are supported by his immunologist, who informed him that receiving a vaccine would be “medically unnecessary”, as well as a joint declaration from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, prominent medical professors at Stanford and Harvard respectively. They write that,
“Multiple extensive, peer-reviewed studies comparing natural and vaccine immunity have now been published. These studies overwhelmingly conclude that natural immunity provides equivalent or greater protection against severe infection than immunity generated by mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna).”
The declaration, found in Exhibit A of the docket, also explains that the evidence to support mitigation measures such as vaccine mandates and passports is lacking.
Count 1: Violation of the Right to Refuse Unwanted and Medically Unnecessary Healthcare
The plaintiff asserts that GMU’s vaccine policy, in practice a mandate, and refusal to acknowledge the merits of natural immunity are problematic because they violate his right to refuse unnecessary healthcare. The complaint states,
“The Supreme Court has recognized that the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual’s right to privacy. A “forcible injection … into a nonconsenting person’s body represents a substantial interference with that person’s liberty[.]” Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 229 (1990).”
The 9th Amendment protects unenumerated rights, which are those that are not explicitly stated in the Constitution. The 14th Amendment protects due process and equal protection under the law. The Covid-19 vaccine is currently deployed under the Emergency Use Authorization and citizens are therefore entitled to be informed of their right to accept or refuse. This fact, combined with the plaintiff’s already robust natural immunity and unlikeliness to infect others with a relatively mild disease, renders such a mandate a violation of privacy. Furthermore, established case law enshrines the right to bodily integrity. The suit asserts,
“Coercing employees to receive an EUA vaccine for a virus that presents a near-zero risk of illness or death to them and which they are exceedingly unlikely to pass on to others, because those employees already possess natural immunity to the virus, violates the liberty and privacy interests that the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments protect.”
If the state wishes to implement a coercive measure, the burden of evidence is on itself to prove that its policy is narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest. The plaintiffs contend,
“Defendants cannot show that they have a compelling interest in coercing Professor Zywicki into taking a COVID-19 vaccine, because GMU has no compelling interest in treating employees with natural immunity any differently from employees who obtained immunity from a vaccine.”
Count 2: Violation of Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine and 14th Amendment’s Right to Due Process
The Unconstitutional Conditions Doctrine prohibits the government from imposing coercive incentives against exercising a constitutionally protected right. GMU’s penalties are therefore an impairment of Professor Zywicki’s right to refuse medical care. His complaint states,
“According to that body of law, GMU cannot impair Professor Zywicki’s right to refuse medical care through subtle forms of coercion any more than it could through an explicit mandate.”
Furthermore, the school’s policy is a violation of due process as it is incongruent, disproportional, and inappropriately flips the burden of evidence onto the plaintiff. In light of the robust immunity established by natural infection, the school cannot logically justify its penalties against those in the GMU community with naturally acquired immunity. The existence of such immunity fully serves the interest of the public health measures implemented by GMU.
The policy is also deficient of proportionality, as the school indicates no intention to assess the level of antibody level of its targets. If the school believes that the prevalence of antibodies is important in advancing its public health goals, then it ought to recognize that they are acquired by both vaccination and infection. The school not only signals any intention to test for antibodies, but makes the premature conclusion that vaccination is superior, even assuming equality of effectiveness amongst all vaccines. The suit asserts,
“In short, allocating burden of proof responsibility to those with natural immunity like Professor Zywicki, coupled with GMU’s stacking the process with presumptions Plaintiff will show are scientifically unwarranted, contravene the Due Process Clause.”
The burden of proof is on the school to show that Zywicki’s naturally acquired immunity is in fact inferior to the vaccines accepted by its policy, and noncompliance poses a threat to public safety. The plaintiff alleged the school has not demonstrated this requirement.
Count 3: Violation of the Supremacy Clause
The Supremacy Clause holds that federal law supersedes state law. GMU’s policy is Virginia state law and the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is federal law. Covid-19 vaccines are authorized by the EUA, which subjects recipients to informed consent. Because GMU’s coercive policies conflict with the letter and spirit of the EUA, it is therefore unconstitutional. According to the complaint,
“That is at odds with the Policy’s forcing Professor Zywicki to sustain significant injury to his career if he does not want to take the vaccine (in light of masking, frequent testing, social distancing, and looming disciplinary action).”
For these reasons and more, Zywicki asked the court to declare the policies unconstitutional and an injunction be issued.
Key Takeaways
The fight over the official narrative regarding Covid-19 is still alive and well. This lawsuit is only illustrative of the two camps that have developed and how insulated many core decision makers have been from one over the other. Natural immunity for example, although clearly affirmed by the supporting evidence, seems to be unacknowledged writ large. The disproportionate perceptions of the risk of Covid-19 are still rampant.
The significance of this case cannot be overstated with vaccine mandates and passports being considered and implemented across the country. One does not need a background in law to understand that the pandemic has sent the country into another constitutional inflection point. From emergency powers, to lockdowns, to eviction moratoriums, and now vaccine mandates, the precedents we set today will forever affect the ark of our system of constitutional government.
Ethan Yang
Ethan Yang is an Adjunct Research Fellow at AIER as well as the host of the AIER Authors Corner Podcast.
He holds a BA in Political Science with a concentration in International Relations with minors in legal studies and formal organizations from Trinity College in Hartford Connecticut. He is currently pursuing a JD from the Antonin Scalia Law School at George Mason University.
Ethan also serves as the director of the Mark Twain Center for the Study of Human Freedom at Trinity College and is also involved with Students for Liberty. He has also held research positions at the Cato Institute, the Connecticut State Senate, Cause of Action Institute and other organizations.
Ethan is currently based in Washington D.C and is a recipient of the 13th Annual International Vernon Smith Prize from the European Center of Austrian Economics Foundation. His work has been featured and cited in a variety of outlets from online media to radio broadcast.
Get notified of new articles from Ethan Yang and AIER.
SUBSCRIBE
A post on Telegram tells us that 70% of the people said NO, and that all “vaccine” distribution has been halted.
If true, that makes two countries that have set a great example for the world (the other being Guyana).
If you know of any others, or have more info on those two, please share.
MCM
Categories
“What is science?” (George Orwell)
If Orwell were to update this piece (from 1945), he would probably note that today’s scientists are at, the service not of nationalism(s) but of globalism, that being where the money is.
(Two typos: “smell” should be “smells,” and “same” should be “sane.”)
http://plaza.ufl.edu/trishak/George%20Orwell_%20What%20is%20Science_.pdf
MCM
A New Low for the FDA
vaccinetruthhttps://trialsitenews.com/a-new-low-for-the-fda/August 23, 2021
31 Comments
An Op-Ed By: VaccineTruth
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.
Today, August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the Pfizer COVID19 vaccine in spite of the following issues:
- The vaccines are more likely to kill you than save you. The clinical trial (gold-standard medical research) evidence to date shows the vaccine kills more people than it saves (including Pfizer’s own 6 month randomized study which demonstrated a 7% higher overall death rate for those administered the vaccine. The vaccine reduced COVID deaths by 50%, however this came at the cost of increasing deaths from cardiac arrest and other causes, so that the net benefit is negative, i.e., the vaccine is more likely to kill you than save you. For example, Pfizer’s own study showed deaths from COVID were reduced by a factor of 2, but this saving was more than offset by deaths from cardiac arrest which went up by 4X. This is not a good tradeoff. The safety data in VAERS compared with the CDC data on mortality for different age cohorts also confirms that the vaccines are more likely to harm than help.
- No autopsies have ever been done in the US on patients who die after getting the vaccine to determine if the vaccine contributed to the death. It is astonishing there are 13,068 death reports in VAERS without even a single autopsy being done in the US and nobody in academia, Congress, or the mainstream media has called for autopsies. Autopsies are a huge risk for them because if they are done, people will realize just how unsafe these vaccines really are.
- Pathology reports from one of the world’s top pathologists showed that at least 30% of the deaths within 2 weeks of vaccination were due to the vaccine. He was immediately criticized by people who never examined the bodies!?! Calls by the Federal Association of German Pathologists to require autopsies in vaccinated patients who have died have been ignored by the German authorities. They don’t want to find out the truth either because once people learn how deadly the vaccines are, nobody will want to be vaccinated.
- No analysis has been done of the obviously elevated neurological and cardiovascular events in the VAERS system (see table below). How can a safe vaccine cause all of these events to skyrocket vs. previous years?
- A broken formula for adverse-event signal detection keeps the CDC from detecting safety signals that would alert the CDC of a problem with the vaccines. The CDC will not meet with us to discuss this serious error. They have no interest in seeing safety signals, so maintaining an obviously broken system gives them all plausible deniability.
- A callous disregard for the health of our children. There are 18 deaths in VAERS for kids between 12 and 17. Five of those deaths are from cardiac arrest and none are from cancer. Yet the CDC says deaths from cancer are twice as likely than deaths from heart disease for teenagers. So the vaccine is clearly killing our kids by elevating cardiac arrests way above normal. Ignoring this is tragic. This UK article points out that just 1 in every 1.7 million children have died with Covid-19 in 18 months, while 1 in every 9 children suffered a serious adverse reaction to the Pfizer vaccine in the small and short clinical trial which left them unable to perform daily activities. Mothers should be absolutely furious about this data being hidden from them.
- Refusal to listen to scientifically qualified VAERS experts who had analyses showing the vaccines were extremely unsafe, including Dose 1 vs. Dose 2 causality analyses that clearly showed the vaccines were causing significant adverse events. Dose-dependency is a very clear sign of causality but the FDA and CDC refuse to look at the data.
- Failure to investigate clinical trial fraud such as 12-year-old Maddie de Garay, paralyzed in the Pfizer clinical trial, despite assurances by the head of the FDA that this would be investigated. The Pfizer clinical trial reported Maddie’s adverse event as abdominal pain with no mention of her severe neurological issues.
- An American death toll estimate of 150,000 can be calculated 5 different ways (and the FDA and CDC wouldn’t look at any of them).
- Lack of any safety data on original antigenic sin aka linked-epitope suppression and ADE. In short, these vaccines may make the disease worse, not better, and the FDA knows both of these are risks, but the FDA isn’t waiting for the data to find out. In addition, there was never a proper safety study that measured the amount, duration, and distribution of the cytotoxic spike protein in non-human primates.
- A safer, more effective alternative exists: early treatment. Early treatment protocols, such as the Fareed-Tyson protocol have more than a 99% relative risk reduction, work for all variants, and have negligible side effects making them safer and more effective than any vaccine. The NIH and FDA ignore these early treatments.
- Too many open questions about the vaccine that still need to be answered. Peter Doshi’s excellent op-ed in the BMJ points out that the list of concerns is now even longer than before, and the fact that the FDA did not seek input from the advisory committee as they had promised to do, is extremely troubling for a drug that is now being mandated.
- Use of censorship, rather than open public discussion, to help the public discover the truth about these vaccines. We have 16 experts covering all aspects of COVID. Nobody in the world from academia or any government agency will publicly engage with us on any topic related to vaccine safety. Instead, they censor us. What are they all afraid of?
We are basically using people of the world as guinea pigs in the largest scientific clinical trial ever, a trial with no “stopping condition” due to the number of deaths caused by the vaccines. No IRB would allow any clinical trial to exist without a death-stopping condition. What’s even more amazing is that not a single member of the medical establishment has a problem with the lack of a death-stopping condition on the vaccine. We remember that back in 1976, the H1N1 vaccine was stopped after just 35 deaths. Today in 2021, 150,000 deaths caused by these vaccines is not even large enough to notice.
However, the FDA doesn’t deserve all the credit. A number of other groups contributed to this remarkable “accomplishment”:
- The CDC ACIP members, charged with safety monitoring, refused to listen to any evidence that there might be a safety problem with the vaccines or a problem with their safety signal monitoring algorithm.
- Medical academia who refused to demand autopsies on people who died within 2 weeks after vaccination, refused to demand a death-stopping condition for the EUA, refused to look at the VAERS data, and refused to openly debate anyone with divergent views (such as our team). The Stanford team who did listen to our concerns said they could not dispute what we said but that it didn’t matter because the decision on mandating vaccination for students was made at a higher level.
- Medical journals who refused to publish papers that went against the narrative even after peer review and galley proofs were accepted.
- Mainstream media that ignored vaccine victims, including Maddie de Garay, even though this was clear clinical trial fraud. They refused to give any voice to qualified people such as Robert Malone and Peter McCullough.
- Social networks including YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter who did a marvelous job censoring anyone who has views that are different from the narrative espoused by the CDC, WHO, and US government. For example, when people in the Facebook vaccine side effects group started pointing out that the drug companies made it difficult-to-impossible to report adverse events in the Phase 3 clinical trials, Facebook removed the groups so that all evidence of clinical trial fraud would be covered up and so that vaccine victims would never discover that hundreds of thousands of other people had been disabled by the vaccines.
- Members of Congress and their staff for refusing to seriously listen to any constituent who brought up legitimate safety concerns with the vaccines that were backed with primary data. Rather than explain how the evidence presented could possibly be consistent with a safe vaccine, the Members and their staff simply told their constituents that they were wrong and refused to read the evidence presented to them.
Today, all of these groups are proud of what they have accomplished: a coordinated effort to suppress legitimate scientific evidence and dissent through censorship and intimidation and approve a vaccine that has caused enormous death and disability in America that has no scientific evidence whatsoever of an all-cause mortality benefit.
It’s a sad day in America
We salute scientists and doctors who are not afraid to speak out like Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Bret Weinstein, Dr. Byram Bridle, Dr. Chris Martenson, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Charles Hoffe, Dr. Francis Christian, Dr. Sin Hang Lee, Dr. Jessica Rose, Dr. Tess Lawrie, as well as courageous journalists including Del Bigtree, Joe Rogan, and former NY Times reporter Alex Berenson, and others who are the real truth tellers here.
America should be listening to and embracing all of these people, not ignoring them.
Finally, here is a table of elevated adverse events that was extracted from the VAERS system. Anyone can replicate this table. The methodology is described starting on page 41 of this document. This is not a complete list. What this table shows is that this is the most deadly vaccine ever produced in modern times. Every cardio and neurological symptom we looked at was elevated. These events are consistent with the mechanism of action of the vaccines (causing a cytotoxic spike protein to be produced inside all organs). No vaccine in recent times has a breadth of impact as wide as these vaccines.
Thanks to the FDA and others, we’ll now be mandating these very deadly vaccines for all our kids.
In this chart, the numbers in the right hand column indicate the factor over “normal” that the symptom is elevated, so 473 means 473 times higher than the average annual reporting rate in VAERS over the past 5 years (from 2015-2019 for ages 20 to 60), The spelling matches the VAERS symptom spelling and the searches were done on the SYMPTOM field which is coded by HHS and not the reporter.
Follow the TSN FDA Channel
| Symptom | Incidence rate elevation over normal (X factor) |
| Pulmonary embolism | 473 |
| Stroke | 326 |
| Deep vein thrombosis | 264.3 |
| Thrombosis | 250.5 |
| Fibrin D dimer increased | 220.8 |
| Appendicitis | 145.5 |
| Tinnitus | 97.3 |
| Cardiac arrest | 75 |
| Death | 58.1 |
| Parkinson’s disease | 55 |
| Slow speech | 54.3 |
| Aphasia (inability to talk) | 52.3 |
| Fatigue | 50.9 |
| Pericardial effusion | 50.5 |
| Headache | 46.4 |
| Chills | 45.6 |
| Pericarditis | 44.9 |
| Deafness | 44.7 |
| Myocarditis | 43.2 |
| Haemorrhage intracranial | 42.5 |
| Abortion Spontaneous | 41.3 |
| Cough | 38.5 |
| Bell’s Palsy | 36.6 |
| Paraesthesia | 29.5 |
| Blindness | 29.1 |
| Dyspnea (difficulty breathing) | 28.4 |
| Myalgia | 28.4 |
| Dysstasia (difficulty standing) | 27.8 |
| Seizure | 27 |
| Anaphylactic Reaction | 21 |
| Suicide | 18.3 |
| Speech disorder | 17.2 |
| Convulsion | 16.3 |
| Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) | 16.3 |
| Paralysis | 16 |
| Swelling | 14.3 |
| Diarrhoea | 11.9 |
| Neuropathy | 11.2 |
| Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome | 11.1 |
| Depression | 8.9 |
NOTICE: This communication is vulnerable to being acquired and stored by the National Security Agency (NSA) in secret. Absent a finding of “probable cause” that you and/or I are engaged in illegal activity, such action by the NSA violates my right, guaranteed by the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, to be secure from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” The parties to this email do not consent to any government official, body, person, or entity acting for or with the government collecting, storing, or retrieving this communication or any related metadata.