Article link:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-likely-in-u-s-in-mid-december-2019-cdc-scientists-report-11606782449
Author: MCM
Biofascism at MIT
From Andrew W. Saul:
In case NYU’s administration was at a loss for new repressive moves, here’s a model from MIT:
https://covidapps.mit.edu/covid-pass
“You must complete specified requirements to get and maintain access to campus buildings, including your residence if you live on campus. This includes acknowledging and agreeing to conditions, completing training, a daily health attestation, and regular COVID-19 testing. If you do not meet ALL requirements, you will not have access to campus buildings.”
I used to teach (nine years) for the State University of NY. If I were asked now, I would advise prospective freshmen to simply save their money and loan burden and not enroll.
I’m suing my department colleagues for libel
My colleagues’ letter to the dean of NYU’s Steinhardt School, demanding that he order a “review” of my “conduct,” is clearly libelous, as it makes many claims about me that are absolutely false, portraying me as a menace in the classroom and beyond, and a purveyor of “explicit hate speech” via News from Underground. You may read their letter, as it’s linked in this complaint (Exhibit 1).
You may also read my point-by-point rebuttal, which I sent them a few weeks ago, requesting a retraction and apology. I asked for a response by Nov. 20, and didn’t get one. That silence prompted me to retain counsel, and file this lawsuit, as I will not sit back and let calumny and libel rule, or be intimidated by a mob, even one that thinks it’s acting righteously (as the worst mobs all too often do). (My rebuttal is attached.)
Meanwhile, as the dean’s “review” is ongoing—despite FIRE’s powerful letter to NYU President Andrew Hamilton, urging him to quash it, on the grounds that it has no legal basis whatsoever (he too was asked to respond by Nov. 20, and he too did not)—many students, former and current, as well as people who have visited my classes through the years, have been sending statements of support to the dean’s office, noting the enormous gap between my colleagues’ slander and the (as we might quaintly call it) reality of how I teach, and how I’ve always taught, treating all my students with civility and respect, while urging them to do their own research, and make up their own minds.
This lawsuit makes quite clear that my colleagues’ venomous, fact-free attack is intolerable in any university purporting to believe in academic freedom. I intend to press it, whatever it may cost, because that precious freedom has to be defended, or it’s going to disappear for all of us.
As always, I am very grateful for your staunch support.
So no need for the Swiss army to attack the people with syringes.
Article link:
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/switzerland-halves-infections-without-national-154343855.html
Roll-out of a vaccine that’s been barely tested, of a sort that’s never been used before.
Article link:
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/army-bristol-stadium-coronavirus-vaccine-114456873.html
From Gerard Boersma:
Dear Mark,
Recently a group of top experts (with some major names) peer-reviewed the Corman-Drosten paper, which has served as the basis for most PCR tests.
The scientists discovered at least ten “major scientific flaws,” and deem the paper to be rubbish. They filed a retraction request at Eurosurveillance. This, of course, should have major consequences for the worldwide use of PCR tests.
The review is here:
https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/Gerard Boersma
Their letter is excellent. God bless FIRE!
Article link:
https://www.thefire.org/nyu-ignores-academic-freedom-investigates-mark-crispin-millers-course-content-blog-post/
Or so it seems. I was able to get to it, then, minutes later, I was not, as the link now took me—and was taking people on this list—to a whole bunch of other videos. Some say they can still get it, so it could be some weird glitch.
In any case, it is attached. (Here’s hoping it comes through.) Thanks to Denis Rancourt for providing it.
The proof is in. Joe Biden lost.
Other than its praise of Donald Trump as “a president of ordinary people”—a paean that his “midnight regulations” show to be completely undeserved, as they will do great harm to ordinary people—this summary of the overwhelming evidence that this election (too) was stolen is invaluable, and SHOULD convince all those with even slightly open minds that We the People don’t want Biden/Harris to be president, for all the media’s thunderous exertions to “elect” them.
Article link:
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2020/11/30/the-proof-is-in-the-election-was-stolen/