Categories
NFU

What’s up with those fires in Australia (AND California)?

According to the “logic” of the moment, the wildfires burning up Australia, like those that blasted some 2 million acres in California, are proof that “climate change” has now brought on the planetary emergency that we’ve been warned about for decades.

I put “logic” in scare quotes (so to speak) because that inference isn’t really logical at all—that is, not based on any actual forensic study of the fires in question—but an emotional reaction to the terroristic spectacle of all that fire, and its authoritative gloss by “our free press” as “proof” that “climate change” has brought us to the brink of global ruin. Under pressure of that grimly annotated spectacle, anyone who questions whether “climate change” has brought on such “unprecedented” fires is a “denialist” almost as dangerous as the fires themselves.   

While the “logic” of that panicked inference is quite unrelated either to pyrology or careful climatology, it would be wrong to say it has no scientific basis—for it does reflect directly on a science that those panicking cannot even perceive, much less comprehend: the science of propaganda. The long, incessant, ever-louder drumbeat of those climate-change assertions and predictions, culminating now in those convenient terrifying “proofs” that those assertions have been true, and those predictions accurate, comprise a global drama exemplifying propaganda at its most sophisticated, and certainly enhanced by yet another scientific coup that those “well-educated” panicked masses also can’t (or won’t) perceive.

That high technical accomplishment is geoengineering, whereby those fires would seem to have been created and prolonged. 

An enlightening video on Australia’s fires:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxHcBDp4J84&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR2WD2i4eaYNH36rm0KVR_0EL6NtztwIh4rtq-Y5AlJecwZGGoCrhVmeggw

Relatedly, on the fact that Australia has not been unusually “dry” this last half-century, as widely advertised, but fairly wet (in a piece that blames poor forest management for the disaster):
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2020/01/04/australia-fires-and-misses/

Also relatedly, Australian police are claiming that the fires were caused by “arsonists” and lightning, not climate change (without suggesting that such “arsonists” may have been operating overhead):
https://summit.news/2020/01/03/australian-police-say-arsonists-lightning-to-blame-for-bushfires-not-climate-change/

On the apparent use of energy-directed weapons to set off the fires in California (three of many pieces on that question):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A58rYo_36JA

https://www.aircrap.org/2017/10/13/california-fires-dew-directed-energy-weapons/

https://www.aircrap.org/2017/12/14/california-fires-space-based-weather-weapons/

All this is—or should be—food for thought.

MCM

One reply on “What’s up with those fires in Australia (AND California)?”

Yes, this is actually what I think has been going on with the fires. I think they are using directed energy weapons and burning people in their homes. Some (maybe Rosa Koire for example) say that this has to do with UN Agenda 21 and plans to get the people off the land and into smart cities. And I’ve also heard people in CA talk about how the forest fires are occurring exactly where there are plans for a high speed rail. I showed one of the California fire videos (Paradise) to a friend of mine who is a retired fireman, and he said those are not normal fires and that he’s never seen anything like that.

I also studied some of the fire videos from Oregon and some don’t really fit with the idea of forest fires. It seems like they are almost burning through a suburban neighborhood and the burn pattern does not make sense (trees are left standing while homes are decimated):

Oregon Almeda Fire Aerial Views of Devastation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQ0Fl_HMRGc&feature=emb_title

This is from Catherine Austin Fitts’ twitter (I don’t think it’s China):
Beam Of Light Aimed At West Coast Fires As Pentagon Warns That China Has Weaponized Space
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pc2wnsL0b4w&feature=emb_title

Many years ago Congressman Dennis Kucinich introduced a bill to ban space based weapons/exotic weapons (https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/2977/text). It looks like it refers to directed energy weapons, as well as other weather weapons:

“The term “exotic weapons systems” includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space.” (obviously this bill went nowhere)

Note the mention of “tectonic weapons”–scientist James McCanney has suggested that they have something called “rods from God” weapons that can trigger earthquakes. He suggested this was used on Ecuador years ago when they were in negotiations with the IMF. McCanney also suggested that TPTB caused the earthquake that led to the tsunami and Fukushima nuclear disaster (he believes powerful explosives were placed on the ocean floor). This would be consistent with the fact that in the during the WW2 days the US govt was interested in working on a “tsunami bomb” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tsunami_bomb. Some are also suspicious of the Asian Boxing Day tsunami: http://www.supremelaw.org/authors/vialls/Asia%20Tsunami%20Proved%20Biggest%20War%20Crime%20in%20History.htm

Bottom line: they have weather weapons and they are getting away with using them because most people just assume it was nature.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.