This piece is deeply flawed by two big misconceptions: (1) that computerized vote-COUNTING is okay (as it most certainly is not); and (2) that e-voting is dangerous because it’s prone to random glitches (and not because it’s easy to manipulate deliberately).

Still, it’s great to see the Monitor at least contending with the grave risks of computerized voting, as that at least is an important start.

MCM

The Christian Science Monitor – CSMonitor.com
Exclusive: E-voting puts vote accuracy at risk in four key states

In four battleground states – Pennsylvania, Virginia, Florida, and Colorado – glitches in electronic-voting machines could produce erroneous tallies that would be difficult to detect and potentially impossible to correct, a Monitor analysis finds.

Barbara Sanders of the League of Women Voters selects a candidate during a test of an electronic voting machine in Columbia, Md., in October 2004. As Sanders voted others tallied the same votes from paper ballots to ensure the electronic equipment recorded votes properly.

By Mark Clayton
posted October 25, 2012 at 2:31 pm EDT

Touch-screen electronic voting machines in at least four states pose a risk to the integrity of the 2012 presidential election, according to a Monitor analysis.

In four key battleground states – Pennsylvania, Virginia, Florida, and Colorado – glitches in e-voting machines could produce incorrect or incomplete tallies that would be difficult to detect and all but impossible to correct because the machines have no paper record for officials to go back and check.

While many state officials laud the accuracy of e-voting machines, mechanical and software failures are not a new problem. What makes the risk more serious this year is that polls project a close election, and e-voting problems in any of the four states in question could affect who wins the presidency.

Read more.



2 Comments to “E-voting puts vote-counts at risk in 4 key states, reports the Christian Science Monitor”

  • I think these voting machines are doing well these days. But trust is still a concern. An honest election is the hope of everybody.

  • Why does the Democratic Party continue to put up with the 16 years of GOP electronic election theft? The corporate Democrats are working with Republicans to slow down social progress. Note: in Jan 2009, President Obama and the Senate Democrats had a chance to get rid of the filibuster and return to Senate to 51-vote majority rule. But no, then the Dems would have no excuse for not passing good progressive legislation…

Post comment

Forbidden Bookshelf

Forbidden Bookshelf




“While We Were Sleeping”

While We Were Sleeping is an urgent call to save Greenwich Village from New York University's uncontrolled expansion.

Click here to donate to NYUFASP and receive a copy of "While We Were Sleeping: NYU and the Destruction of New York" (minimum donation to receive a book is $10 plus $8 shipping).

Orwell Rolls In His Grave, featuring MCM – Buy the DVD



About News From Underground

News From Underground is a daily e-news service run by Mark Crispin Miller, a Professor of Culture and Communication at NYU. It is based on his belief that academics, like reporters, have a civic obligation to help keep the people well-informed, so that American democracy might finally work.

If you'd like to receive updates delivered to your inbox daily, sign up for News From Underground Alerts:

Help News From Underground!





Message from Mark: "I am a one-man operation, although assisted greatly by some volunteers, and, now and then, by people paid by others for one-time projects. There is no shortage of skilled, dedicated folks out there who want to help me. There is, however, nothing I can pay them with, unless you decide you can contribute something."

Please donate via the PayPal button above or via PayPal by email to: markcrispinmiller@gmail.com

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Popular Posts

Blogroll

Need a bigger font size?




Sponsored Links



  • Your link could be here too, contact us for pricing details.