Child rapist Jerry Sandusky got a favorable court ruling that was denied Don Siegelman (who’s innocent)

MONDAY, AUGUST 20, 2012
Child Rapist Jerry Sandusky Received a Favorable Court Ruling That Was Denied to Don Siegelman

Former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky was granted a motion that forced prosecutors to provide specifics about charges in his child sexual abuse case. The defendants in the prosecution of former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman were denied a similar motion on charges of public corruption.

What does that mean? One judge found that Sandusky was entitled to specifics about charges that essentially alleged he was a serial child rapist. Another judge found that Siegelman and codefendant Richard Scrushy were not entitled to specifics about charges that essentially sought to criminalize a standard political transaction.

Does that sound fair to you? Is that what passes for justice in American courts?

Read more.

1 thought on “Child rapist Jerry Sandusky got a favorable court ruling that was denied Don Siegelman (who’s innocent)”

  1. Kangaroo courts no longer need to operate as a star chamber. They can do it in plain view as the public is largely asleep. This will make future political vendettas so much easier.

    Mah.Thur.Fah.Curse.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *