NO ONE who comments publicly about US elections—journalist or pundit or professor—EVER says one word about election fraud. Why is that?

Why Do All Election Forecasters, Political Scientists, Academics and Media Pundits Avoid the Systemic Fraud Factor?
22NOV Richard Charnin (TruthIsAll)

It is about time that the so-called experts who promote overly complex or overly simplistic pre and post election models started to apply the scientific method and utilize a robust probability and statistical analysis- and factor in the election fraud variable.

It is often stated that exit polls were very accurate in elections prior to 2004, but have deviated sharply from the vote since. The statement is a misconception; it is based on a comparison of FINAL exit polls in elections prior to 2004 and PRELIMINARY exit polls since. It’s apples and oranges. But FINAL exit polls published in the media have always been FORCED to match the RECORDED vote. That’s why they APPEAR to have been accurate.

The RECORDED vote has deviated sharply from the TRUE VOTE in EVERY election since 1968. Yes, it is true: UNADJUSTED exit polls have ALWAYS been accurate. They closely matched the True Vote in 2000, 2004, 2006, 2008 and 2010. FINAL exit polls have exactly matched the fraudulent RECORDED vote because they have been forced to do so.

Read more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.