Say NO to voter ID, says Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights (but they’re okay with computerized voting??) (2 items)

What would Martin Luther King have thought of it? What would SNCC have thought of it? Electronic voting and vote-counting, run by private companies with rightist management?

It’s astonishing that such a system is acceptable to the current champions of civil rights. Of COURSE they’re right to protest voter ID laws—an abomination—but that’s only half the battle.

MCM

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Tanya Clay House, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
Date: Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:00 PM
Subject: Don’t Wait: Speak out against Voter ID today!

Dear Mark,

Yesterday members of the U.S. House of Representatives took to the floor to decry the voter suppression legislation that is being debated and passed in states across the country and urge the Department of Justice (DOJ) to take action against them.

Now that South Carolina has submitted the photo voter ID law it adopted this year to DOJ for preclearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, you have a chance to stand with these members and speak out for voting rights.

Please send a letter to DOJ now urging them to block South Carolina’s photo voter ID law!

What are the basic problems with these new voter ID bills that require government-issued photo identification in order to vote?

– Studies consistently estimate that approximately 11 percent of voting-age citizens, including one out of every four African Americans, in the country (more than 21 million citizens!) currently lack a government-issued photo ID.

– A study by the Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law found that 18 percent of eligible voters nationwide over 65 lack an ID that would be suitable for voting.

– There may be evidence of isolated instances of alleged voter fraud, but proponents of these photo ID bills cannot point to substantial convictions. In addition, the laws already in place to punish voter fraud are sufficiently severe to deter potential criminals

Please join the Lawyers’ Committee and our leaders in Congress in the fight against this voter suppression activity by telling the Department of Justice to deny preclearance to South Carolina’s voter ID legislation.

Time is running out, the Department of Justice will be making its decision soon. It is time that we said that “enough is enough.” Our right to vote is too important for us to allow these assaults to continue. Instead of debating costly and restrictive measures that are simply unnecessary and unfair, we need to come together and encourage our legislators to genuinely fix our system of elections and expand access to the ballot box.

Click here to submit a letter to the Department of Justice urging them not only to deny preclearance to South Carolina, but to carefully scrutinize other photo voter ID laws as well.

We appreciate your assistance in the fight against voter suppression.

Sincerely,

Tanya Clay House
Public Policy Director
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law

VOTER ID SPARKS BLACK IRE

Washington – Black Congressman John Lewis of Atlanta is joining several other Democrats arguing that the rise of voter–identification laws across many states is a coordinated attempt by Republicans to suppress minority and elderly votes.

Lewis, a civil-rights activist in the 1960s said, “We must fight back. We must speak up and speak out. We must never, ever go back. We will not stand idly by while millions of Americans are denied their right to participate in the democratic process.”

Lewis spoke along with other Democrats and warned that the state laws must be rejected.

Read more.

1 thought on “Say NO to voter ID, says Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights (but they’re okay with computerized voting??) (2 items)”

  1. as stalin said, “it matters not who votes. it matters only who counts the votes!’ even GAO stated flatly that W bush did not authentically win either popular or electoral vote in either election.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *