What happened with that “recount” in Wisconsin could easily happen in New York

Wisconsin Recount:
Holes Big Enough
for an Election
to Fall Into

…and why New Yorkers should care

The State of Wisconsin has just completed a statewide recount of a highly suspicious election, a recount that provides truckloads of additional evidence of the dangers of secret vote counting inside computers. Because Wisconsin uses optical scanners to count most votes just as NY now does, this election provides a lesson for us in the near impossibility of meaningful citizen oversight of an electronic election, even when paper ballots are used.

Cheesy Election

The April 5 Supreme Court election in WI was widely seen as a referendum on the policies of Governor Scott Walker, including the attempted stripping of collective bargaining rights for public workers. The state’s attention was on this vote to fill a 10-year seat on the state’s highest court.

Most of the attention in this WI Supreme Court election recount was focused on Waukesha County, where County Clerk (chief county election official) Kathy Nickolaus had reported the discovery of some 14,000 votes on her office computer two days after the election, reversing the statewide outcome in favor of her former boss, incumbent Justice David Prosser.

Read more.

2 replies on “What happened with that “recount” in Wisconsin could easily happen in New York”

Regarding WI and NY, from the article: “Both use non-transparent, riggable, hackable electronic optical scanners to ‘count’ most votes”. Not really. The votes are CAST on optical scanners and COUNTED on central processors. In a full, honest recount with a solid chain of custody, the hand-counted paper ballots from each precinctc must be equal to the county/state totals. Also, in WI, some wards used DRE touchscreens, which produced unverifiable poll tapes that could have been the result of malicious coding on the DRE..

Who authorized the okay that the open plastic bags containing the hard evidence of paper ballots, was good-to-go for a recount? This should have required another re-do election altogether, by the best evidence of hand-counted paper ballots in precinct during election night, posting the results at each poll which have to match the county/state totals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.