From Allen Feldman:
I wrote the following letter of protest to the BBC in response to this sexist and stupid BBC interview with Assange.
There should be more protests to the BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/contact_today/default.stm
“John Humphreys’ interview with Julian Assange reached a new low for BBC when he repeatedly asked Assange how many “women” he has “slept with.” The question was sexist and irrelevant and I wonder if BBC reporters are required to reveal their private sex lives on air as part of their bona fides. Despite declaiming that “we can’t try the case here, (on-air)” that was precisely what he was doing in asking Assange to disclose his private sex life.
Further Humphreys proved his journalistic incompetence when he conflated the Swedish prosecutor leaking details of an investigation prior to charge or trial that compromises Assange’s presumption of innocence and wikileaks’ reporting of leaked state documents on undeclared wars that have caused mass violations of human rights paid for by taxpayers who have little or no knowledge of the damage being done in their names.”
Transcript: The Assange interview
He is under strict bail conditions while he fights extradition to Sweden where he is wanted for questioning about claims of sexual assault.
Today programme presenter John Humphrys went to meet him for what is Mr Assange’s first face-to-face broadcast interview since his release.
Q: Why won’t you go back to Sweden?
JA: I have been back. I was there for some five weeks after these initial allegations were made. They were dropped within 24 hours of them first being made. The most senior prosecutor in Stockholm reviewed them and they were dropped. Then politician Claes Borgstrom became involved, other forces became involved and the case, the investigative part of the case, was taken up again. We waited some four/five weeks to be interviewed, so I could put my side of this case forward, and that did not happen.