Stop GMO salmon!

The FDA must require labeling of genetically modified salmon.

Submit your comment asking the FDA to require clear labels on GMO salmon, or better yet, ban GMO fish altogether.

Dear Mark,

Earlier this year we let you know about the Food and Drug Administration’s impending approval of a genetically modified (GMO) strain of salmon. Over 54,000 CREDO Action members responded by telling the FDA not to approve the fish.

There are some signs that our pressure is working. At the public hearing in September several members of the advisory committee criticized the poor science submitted by AquaBounty, the company engineering the fish, and called for more rigorous scientific review before moving forward with the approval process.1
While the committee has not yet issued a recommendation on whether to approve the salmon, the FDA has opened a public comment period on labeling requirements should the organism be brought to market. We still firmly believe that AquaBounty’s application should be rejected, but we need to fight this battle on all fronts.
We have until November 22 to let the FDA know that it should not approve GMO salmon, but if it does, to enact strict labeling requirements – so consumers can at the very least make educated decisions about what they eat.

People who know anything about this salmon have good reason to be afraid. The fish is modified with genes from another species – the eelpout – so that it can grow twice as fast as normal.2

Because the FDA is reviewing the salmon application under its rules for animal drugs, there is little focus on the potential dangers of human consumption. Additionally, the FDA has not conducted any of its own research and is instead relying on information provided by AquaBounty, a company that has a financial incentive to downplay potential dangers.

There are also serious concerns about the environmental impact of the fish. Studies show that if just a few GMO salmon escaped into the wild, they could eradicate the wild Atlantic salmon population in less than 40 fish generations.3

Clearly, the FDA shouldn’t allow the fish to be produced in the first place. But if it does, the FDA should require that it be clearly labeled so we can decide on our own to keep it off our dinner plates.

The November 22 deadline is approaching. Submit your public comment today telling the FDA to enact clear labeling requirements for GMO salmon, or better yet, keep it off the market altogether.

Adam Klaus, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets


1 Comment

  1. Geraldine

    November 12, 2010 at 8:57 pm

    This fish should not exist but if it does get approval to come into existence it should not have the right to be called Salmon. They need to call it something else. If I created a human baby in a test tube but it had a chimpanzee gene somewhere in it’s makeup it would not be 100% human. I could not call it human even though te noble chimpanzee is a close cousin. This fish being invented is a crossbreed salmon with a steelhead eel fish gene. This means it is not 100% of Salmon origins so it should not only be rightfully labeled as genetically modified but it also needs a proper name of it’s own. Maybe the Steelmoneelhead Ocean Creation would be suitable but not the name we have given the remarkable Salmon which migrates and spawns every year same time same place and has this inner intelligence that cant be duplicated in a lab. Please leave perfection alone and honor the priceless richness mother earth created for us before it’s too late.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.