Browsing all articles from November, 2010

The Bizarre Tale of Graft and Sleazy Political Opportunism That Brought Us the ‘Porno Scanners’
By Michael Collins, Smirking Chimp
Posted on November 18, 2010, Printed on November 19, 2010

How did we get to the point of full body scans at airports, the massive personal intrusion that represents, and the tens of millions spent for machines that irradiate us as a consequence of merely flying from here to there?

Read more.


This all-too-timely piece came out in May.

MCM

Scientists Question Safety Of New Airport Scanners
by Richard Knox

May 17, 2010

After the “underwear bomber” incident on Christmas Day, President Obama accelerated the deployment of new airport scanners that look beneath travelers’ clothes to spot any weapons or explosives.


Read more.


From Jeremy Hubbell:

Mark,

Good post yesterday on the pollsters in MN. Here’s two more with the first piece = the stakes.

Dayton won, BUT if the recount is in doubt for long enough, then PAWLENTY (who has eyes on the presidency) will get to set the budget and deny MN participation in a Medicaid expansion (which everyone here wants – meaning the hospitals, etc. – but tea partiers don’t).

Now, second piece below: They are bringing in the courts to – get this – make sure the number of votes match the voters – that’s right. To make sure voting fraud did not happen and thus add a layer of delay to the recount…

Jeremy

And the winner is … Pawlenty?

GOP asks high court to act before recount


Why More Antitrust Immunity for the Media is a Bad Idea

Maurice E. Stucke
University of Tennessee College of Law

Allen P. Grunes

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP

Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy

Abstract:
With their financial difficulties, some traditional media firms have called for greater leniency under the federal antitrust laws. The Federal Trade Commission, for example, in recent hearings inquired as to whether antitrust immunity is necessary for newspapers’ collaboration and under what circumstances, if any, antitrust immunity for certain joint conduct could be justified.

Our essay explores why relaxing the federal antitrust laws for traditional media will not help consumers or the marketplace of ideas. We discuss the past problems with antitrust immunity generally and for the media industries specifically. We address the failures of the Newspaper Preservation Act, how deregulation that followed the Telecommunications Act of 1996 failed to promote competition in the radio industry, and why further liberalizing the FCC’s cross-ownership rules to permit greater media consolidation will not promote competition in the marketplace of ideas.

We conclude that, because our democracy’s health depends on competition among traditional media, the cost of allowing already dominant firms to acquire the assets of their remaining competitors outweighs the benefits of looser antitrust laws.


Joe Miller May Seek ‘Hand Count’ in Alaska’s U.S. Senate Race – He’d Be Wise To Do So.
A fully transparent reconciliation would well serve democracy, particularly given AK’s dreadful election history…

- Brad Friedman, The BRAD BLOG

After a week of hand-counting paper write-in ballots in Alaska’s three-way U.S. Senate race between incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski (who ran as an independent write-in candidate), Republican candidate Joe Miller and Democratic candidate Scott McAdams, the Associate Press called the race this afternoon for Murkowski.

Read more.



United We Count!
www.ElectionDefenseAlliance.org
Dear EDA Supporters,
The American people have voted and spoken. And, if you believe that the 75 million-plus votes that were sent into the privatized darkness of cyberspace emerged from that darkness as cast, then you have before you The American Self-Portrait, taken every two years and carried around in all our mental wallets till the next election.
Perhaps to you it is a grim portrait. Perhaps it doesn’t seem to make sense, given the underlying national realities. Or perhaps it does seem to make sense, in light of the stacked electoral money game and all those polls that predicted and prepared us for this outcome.
It is our sad duty to inform you that, once again, the Portrait appears to be a fake.

At EDA we are still crunching numbers, reviewing disparities and anomalies, and will have much more detailed findings and analyses to report in the coming weeks. But the preliminary indications are clear: a dramatic nationwide pattern of “red shifts” (votecounts more Republican than exit polls) in the Senate and Governors’ races; an aggregate red shift in the contests for the House; a huge catalogue of “glitches” and anomalies, and quite a few “impossible” results across the nation.
The truth is that America, while increasingly polarized, remains very closely divided. It doesn’t take many added, deleted, or shifted votes to reverse outcomes across the land and to dramatically alter the Self-Portrait that emerges.

Examining, for example, the Battle for the House, a total of fewer than 50,000 Democrat votes instead of Republican in the closest contests would have left the House under Democratic control. The red shift we uncovered for the House races nationwide was 1.7% or 1.25 million votes, twenty-five times the 50,000 votes that constituted the national Republican “‘victory’ margin.”
There are signs that real-time calibrating of votes needed to “win” targeted races is becoming easier, and the vote processing infrastructure to enable such exploits proliferating. EDA is attempting to investigate these developments, which make it possible to steal more elections while stealing fewer votes, leaving barely a numerical footprint.
EDA is also probing the polling methodologies that have yielded red-shifted polls to match red-shifted elections, making everything seem right enough. We know, for instance, that the now universally adopted sampling protocol known as the Likely Voter Cutoff Model is a red-shifting, methodologically unjustifiable ploy that nonetheless predicted last Tuesday’s results. EDA is asking “Why?” We expect to issue a detailed study of polling distortions and fudge factors in the coming weeks.
We at EDA are accustomed and fairly hardened to nights like last Tuesday by now. The most maddening part for us may well be listening to the Wednesday post-mortem analyses in which very astute pundits on, say, NPR read the tea leaves with straight faces and 100% faith in the gospel of the official results as their premise.  Official results that we, sleepless and still crunching numbers in an attempt to keep honest score at home, had already recognized as likely lies.
Excepting Dan Rather on HDNet TV on October 26, there have been virtually no journalists courageous enough to tell this story.  Much of our work going forward will be to persuade those same pundits and opinion leaders to scale the towering wall of never-happen-here denial that is putting our nation at such grave risk.

We must get the facts about our electoral system into public dialogue to create a foundation for a rational and unblinking examination of evidence and for serious investigation.  You can help us achieve this critical goal. Do you have a pipeline to any opinion leaders in any arena-academic, journalistic, celebrity, even corporate-to whom you could help us obtain access? If you do have access to any such public figures who might step up and get on board, please write to us directly as soon as possible.
How many more elections can our democracy survive with the use of concealed vote-counting, where there is no meaningful oversight by citizens, election officials, or the media?  How many more elections where the will of the public is ignored?  Time is running out on our democracy.
If you cannot help with contacts, please consider a tax-deductible gift.  We need to hire a PR firm as another means to broadcast this news. Thank you. http://ElectionDefenseAlliance.org/donate.

Sincerely yours,
Jonathan Simon, Director                                    Sally Castleman, National Chairperson

There’s a big brouhaha in Minnesota, where Republicans are screaming at those polling outfits that, they charge, got several races “wrong,” in that they showed the Democrats ahead.

And now those pollsters are backpedaling and, in effect, apologizing, vowing “to do better next time.”

Thus what’s happening is much like what went down after the 2004 election, when everybody–both parties and the “liberal media–laughed off all those exit polls which showed John Kerry winning in eleven states.

The problem here is the absurd presumption that the official count is always right, while contradictory polls are always wrong. (That presumption, oddly enough, holds for the US alone, since contradictory exit polls are always right in Iran, Venezuela, and wherever else the government is wrong in US eyes.)

Instead of backing off and eating crow, the pollsters in MN should be attacking their attackers–and asking if their own polls might, in fact, not indicate the possibility that the Republicans did less well with the voters than we think.

Because there’s actually no evidence, aside from the official numbers, that those winners really won, or that those losers really lost. And so it is throughout the nation, since we now have a completely faith-based voting system, as more of us ought to be pointing out.

MCM

Chagrined pollsters hope to do better next time
By Dave Orrick

Dayton ahead by 12 points.

Oberstar to win by 10 percentage points.

Republicans to pick up eight state Senate seats.

Wrong, wrong and wrong.

Those prognostications, by nonpartisan and partisan polls in advance of Nov. 2′s power-shifting election, weren’t just off. They were way off when compared with the election results.

And now the pollsters are under fire.

Read more.


Hedges: We’re Losing Our Intelligence — How the Purge of True Dissent Has Starved Our Discourse
By Chris Hedges, Truthdig
Posted on November 15, 2010, Printed on November 16, 2010

The blacklisted mathematics instructor Chandler Davis, after serving six months in the Danbury federal penitentiary for refusing to cooperate with the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), warned the universities that ousted him and thousands of other professors that the purges would decimate the country’s intellectual life.

Read more.



That’s what “lobbying effort” means.

MCM

Chamber to unveil pro-business lobbying effort
The group plans to announce an agenda that includes attacking regulations covering labor, energy, healthcare and financial services, which it says it hampering the economic recovery.
November 15, 2010 | By Tom Hamburger and Noam N. Levey, Los Angeles Times

Reporting from Washington – After spending a record amount this election season to change the balance of power in Washington, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce this week plans to announce a pro-business agenda that will include attacking federal regulations in four areas: labor, energy, healthcare and financial services.

The business organization’s leaders will announce their targets Wednesday, arguing that excessive government regulation is hampering economic recovery.

“American businesses are sinking under its weight,” chamber President Thomas J. Donohue said Monday.

Read more.


PBS edits Tina Fey’s remarks from Twain event
By Paul Farhi

Tina Fey got a little political airbrushing from PBS Sunday night during its annual broadcast of theKennedy Center’s Mark Twain Prize for American Humor.

Fey, this year’s recipient of the prize, caused a few ripples during her acceptance speech at the ceremony on Tuesday when she mock-praised “conservative women” like Sarah Palin, whom Fey has so memorably impersonated on “Saturday Night Live.”

“And, you know, politics aside, the success of Sarah Palin and women like her is good for all women – except, of course –those who will end up, you know, like, paying for their own rape ‘kit ‘n’ stuff,” Fey said. “But for everybody else, it’s a win-win. Unless you’re a gay woman who wants to marry your partner of 20 years – whatever. But for most women, the success of conservative women is good for all of us. Unless you believe in evolution. You know – actually, I take it back. The whole thing’s a disaster.”

Read more.


Orwell Rolls In His Grave, featuring MCM – Buy the DVD

About News From Underground

News From Underground is a daily e-news service run by Mark Crispin Miller, a Professor of Culture and Communication at NYU. It is based on his belief that academics, like reporters, have a civic obligation to help keep the people well-informed, so that American democracy might finally work.

If you'd like to receive updates delivered to your inbox daily, sign up for News From Underground Alerts:

Help News From Underground!



Message from Mark: "I am a one-man operation, although assisted greatly by some volunteers, and, now and then, by people paid by others for one-time projects. There is no shortage of skilled, dedicated folks out there who want to help me. There is, however, nothing I can pay them with, unless you decide you can contribute something."

Please donate via the ChipIn widget above or via paypal to markcrispinmiller@gmail.com

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Popular Posts

Twitter



Blogroll

Need a bigger font size?


  • A A A


  • Sponsored Links