This exclusion shouldn’t come as a surprise, since Obama’s policy, re: public housing, is to privatize the system coast to coast–as we noted in May:
So this exclusion of progressive activists recalls BushCo’s exclusion of environmentalists from Dick Cheney’s energy task force meetings at the White House back in 2001. Which is to say, it isn’t promising.
Obama HUD housing policy conference excludes affordable housing advocates
(1) Obama replaced by evil twin.
(2) Someone’s punking Robert Gibbs.
(3) Business as usual.
“We’ve got PIMCO, Wells Fargo, the goddamn American Enterprise Institute, the MacArthur Foundation, Moody’s, and Bank of America.
“‘Apparently being a community organizer qualifies you to be president, but it’s not good enough to be part of HUD and Treasury’s think tank on housing,’ said [National Community Reinvestment Coalition] chief executive John Taylor, whose group works with hundreds of community organizations to promote access to financial services for low- and middle-income people.
“The fact that the Obama administration is assembling a bunch of credentialed but cloistered experts to solve the housing crisis without input from people actually on the ground with those affected by the housing crisis is, sadly, not that surprising.”
Why is not surprising? Because the HUD Secretary has qualifications barely more impressive than Education Secretary Arne Duncan. Well, not really. He’s got a master’s in architecture, and he worked for HUD in the Clinton administration, so he actually has some relevant experience. But just like Arne, he’s presided over a big-city neo-liberal public/private disaster under New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, “Which should’ve immediately disqualified him,” Pareene noted, going on to explain:
“The Bloomberg administration has a wretched and largely ignored history of promising affordable housing and never delivering. (Not to mention the worst failure of the Bloomberg era: homelessness. It was at historically high levels even before the great financial crisis and no serious attempts at ameliorating it ever developed.)
The link there goes to a Daily News article from a year ago Friday:
“The Bloomberg administration never checked to see if developers who got discounted city land in exchange for building affordable housing kept their end of the deal, the Daily News has learned.
“The Cornerstone Program was supposed to transfer vacant city-owned land to private developers who promised to build 2,191 homes there, with 1,510 units designated for low-or middle-income New Yorkers.
“Yet the Department of Housing Preservation and Development has not followed up to see whether developers complied with those terms, an audit obtained by The News found.”
What could possibly go wrong???