These figures are usually bogus. Remember how the Lancet’s figures were debunked. Also keep in mind: These casualty figures also usually include sectarian violence. Iraqi vs. Iraqi. These deaths are tragic as well, but you can’t put the blame on the U.S. soldiers.
No-one ever actually debunked The Lancet’s figures. Pro-Bush flacks _impugned_ them through snide strokes of mere assertion (such as your claim that “these figures are usually bogus”).
Moreover, all those deaths are undeniably a consequence of the US invasion of Iraq, whoever’s done the killing in specific cases. You CAN, therefore, “put the blame” on Bush’s policy (unless your intellect’s been crippled by Bush/Cheney-worship).
It was shown how the casualty figures were arrived at by doing a mini-survey of casualty reports from hospitals and then plugging in mathematical extrapolations that had no business being a part of this report. This is a casualty report, not a poll.
The people of Iraq no longer have Saddam murdering them by the truckload; unfortunately, some of the people took this as an opportunity to murder other people who don’t belong to their sect of Islam. That’s on them. It is not on Bush.
And if Saddam had been left in power, he would eventually go back to murdering his own people by the truckload. Would the left then find a way to blame Bush for that? I bet they would.
“It was shown,” eh? By whom? The Pentagon? Your mom? The fact is that The Lancet’s estimate still stands; but it’s irrelevant to _this_ new figure of 1,000,000+ dead. You have no grounds for dismissing it, other than to say that “these figures are usually bogus.”
On the other hand, you argue that, although Iraqis _have_ been dying “by the truckload,” Bush is not responsible, although this is his war. (He and Cheney really cared about Iraq’s security after their invasion, eh?) Then you argue that Saddam Hussein would have murdered just as many.
Well, Saddam Hussein was monstrousâ€”â€”just as monstrous when the Reagan/Bush administrations armed and funded him as he was thereafter. But, bad as he was, his regime did not kill as many of his people as have died since Bush invaded.
Your posts are little quagmires of illogic and disinformation. One could spend hours trying to set the record straight. So I’ll now leave this conversation, and ignore your next post, brave Anonyous.