SCOTUS's far-right rhetoric prevails

Supreme Court Rhetoric Reveals
Deep ‘Hostility’ To Women’s Rights
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court today upheld a nationwide ban on “partial birth” abortion. The nation’s leading group of professionals providing health care for women, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, opposes this law because the banned procedure is often the best option for women.

Yet the majority – Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito – dismiss the medical community’s opinion and instead adopt political rhetoric intended to appeal to the right-wing base. Some examples:

Abortion methods vary depending to some extent on the

preferences of the physician and, of course, on the term of
the pregnancy and the resulting stage of the unborn
child’s development. (p. 3)

The law need not give abortion doctors unfettered choice in

the course of their medical practice, nor should it elevate
their status above other physicians in the medical community.
(p. 33)

When standard medical options are available, mere
convenience does not suffice to displace them. (p. 37)

Read more.

0 replies on “SCOTUS's far-right rhetoric prevails”

We’re talking about bringing a baby partially out of the birth canal so it can be killed. You got that? Killed. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of life today.

And that ugly procedure may sometimes be necessary to save the mother’s life. You got that? Or do you prefer to let the state, and not a woman’s doctor, make that call?

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.