He’s calling for a full congressional investigation of all four contested races
in the ’06 Florida elections. (So far, the Dems in DC have talked only about
Christine Jennings’s “loss” to Vern Buchanan in FL-13.)
Let’s open this thing up!
Clint Curtis Campaign Calls for Congressional Investigation of His Contested U.S. House Race Against Tom Feeney
Says Panel Must Review ‘Hard Evidence’ Gathered Showing ’12-24% More Votes Than Stated in Official Results’
Vote-Rigging Whistleblower Turned Candidate Says All Four Challenged Races in Florida Must be Investigated by House, Not Just FL-13’s Jennings/Buchanan Race…
And speaking of Tom Feeney and Clint Curtis, the man who made a number of alarming accusations about him; including (but not limited to) a vote-rigging conspiracy in 2000, protection of an undocumented alien who pled guilty to espionage charges related to sending restricted missile chips to Communist China, and much more…
Curtis released a statement last week in regard to the contest he’s filed in the U.S. House last December under the Federal Contested Elections Act following his House race against Feeney in Florida’s 24th district last November. (The statement is posted at end of this article.)
In an exclusive BRAD BLOG interview from early March, Curtis spoke about “hard evidence” gathered by his campaign showing that his votes were under-recorded — and/or Feeney’s over-recorded — on the paperless touch-screen voting systems used in the race. Their evidence has been gathered via a precinct-by-precinct, door-to-door canvass being carried out by the campaign volunteers.
“We have now found absolutelyÅ more votes for Democrats than the official results show,” Curtis told us earlier this year. “Absolutely more votes. No trends, no guesses. More votes. That should never happen.”
The campaign’s news release claims that “In every precinct studied, the data shows that Curtis received 12-24% more votes than stated in the official result.”…