This new report is crucial reading for all those concerned about
election fraud–which, last Tuesday, was, again, a massive
problem, notwithstanding all the blithe post-mortems issued
by the US press from Tuesday night on through the week.
(Nor surprisingly, Diebold joined that chirpy chorus with a
long mendacious press release promoting Diebold’s wares.)
Now here’s some startling evidence of widespread fraud, assembled
by my good friends at the Election Defense Alliance. It’s likely
that the Dems actually did win, or should have won, some 50
House seats–and that Bush/Cheney’s GOP was not just
“thumped” but devastated.
Please spread this piece far and wide.
November 17, 2006 at 10:56:26
Clear Evidence 2006 Congressional Elections Hacked;
by Rob Kall
A major undercount of Democratic votes and an overcount of Republican votes in U.S. House and Senate races across the country is indicated by an analysis of national exit polling data, by the Election Defense Alliance (EDA), a national election integrity organization.
These findings have led EDA to issue an urgent call for further investigation into the 2006 election results and a moratorium on deployment of all electronic election equipment.
“We see evidence of pervasive fraud, but apparently calibrated to political conditions existing before recent developments shifted the political landscape,” said attorney Jonathan Simon, co-founder of Election Defense Alliance, “so ‘the fix’ turned out not to be sufficient for the actual circumstances.” Explained Simon, “When you set out to rig an election, you want to do just enough to win. The greater the shift from expectations, (from exit polling, pre-election polling, demographics) the greater the risk of exposure–of provoking investigation. What was plenty to win on October 1 fell short on November 7.