PBS faces reality

Your Right to Vote – Is It Under Assault?
NOW
t r u t h o u t | Programming Note
Airdate: Friday, September 1, 2006, at 8:30 p.m. on PBS.
(Check local listings at
http://www.pbs.org/now/sched.html.)

Your right to vote – is it under assault? This time on NOW.

Across the nation, states have enacted new laws supposedly designed to prevent voter fraud and avoid election day debacles, but qualified voters may also be left out in the cold, especially minorities, the poor, the elderly and the disabled. On September 1 at 8:30 p.m., NOW looks at several states where these new rules may keep voters away from the polls in November. In Florida, new penalties for registration delays forced traditional registration advocacy groups, like the League of Women Voters, to avoid registering voters for a crucial primary. In Georgia, a law requires voters to show photo identification, a barrier to voting for thousands of people who currently lack the proper ID. Many of these laws have been approved by the Department of Justice, which is charged with protecting the rights of all voters.
“This is a concerted effort to make sure that certain people don’t have the opportunity to vote, that they don’t have the opportunity to participate in their own democracy,” Georgia state representative Alisha Thomas Morgan told NOW.
Also, David Brancaccio interviews Salon reporter Eric Boehlert about the effectiveness of a new Iraqi offensive. This time on NOW.

Note: The NOW website at www.pbs.org/now will provide additional coverage starting Friday morning, September 1. Features include the 11 worst places in America to vote, a state-by-state overview of election rights, and a closer look at the Voting Rights Act.

0 thoughts on “PBS faces reality”

  1. Thanks again Mark for all you do. This group just a few days ago pops up and disperses on liberal sites, and I thought you should know, just in case.

    googled

    Vote Now 2006! – Easy and FREE
    Great News! http://www.VoteNow2006.com can provide a place where every citizen can … Cast your vote on http://www.VoteNow2006.com to show your intent that you are …
    http://www.votenow2006.net/ – 23k – Cached – Similar pages

    Clint Curtis has a parallel election web site – sort of – check it out
    … 2006 to hopefully become the Democratic candidate to run against Tom Feeney for Congress has created a website http://www.VoteNow2006.com – it is a place that …
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364×1994354 – 35k – Cached – Similar pages

    Support Clint Curtis For US Congress
    Record your vote on http://www.VoteNow2006.com . It is a legal “paper trail” connection to the voters that Ohio did NOT have when disputing the 2004 election. …
    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=145×7477 – 64k – Aug 31, 2006 – Cached – Similar pages

    Printer friendly page, topic ID #12066 –
    Great News! http://www.VoteNow2006.com can provide a place where every citizen can record their vote in secret and the actual totals of elections can be verified …
    http://www.bartcopnation.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=printer_friendly&forum=11&topic_id=12066&mesg_id=12113 – 3k – Cached – Similar pages

    The BRAD BLOG : DYSFUNCTION AT THE DNC: Brad Addresses the DNC on …
    Visit http://www.votenow2006.com . Parallel elections will provide the candidate the link back to the voter to contest a suspicious election. …
    http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3308 – 210k – Cached – Similar pages

    Vote Now 2006! – Easy and FREE
    Make the use of http://www.VoteNow2006.com as part of your campaign. … The voter casts their vote on http://www.VoteNow2006.com to show their intent that they are …
    https://votenow2006.net/candidate.asp – 15k – Aug 31, 2006 – Cached – Similar pages

  2. Laura Flanders did a nice segment on ethnic cleansing as an electoral strategy. Both Louisiana and Florida appear to be trying to rid themselves of voters exhibiting excessive negritude. The description of the trailer farms in Louisiana as concentration camps, where people are not granted the right to speak to the press, were heartbreaking.

    And, unfortunately, yes, the Bush White House would do it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *