Great overview of the Big Theft

The stolen election of 2004
by Michael Parenti
July 11, 2006

The 2004 presidential contest between Democratic challenger Senator John Kerry and the Republican incumbent, President Bush Jr., amounted to another stolen election. This has been well documented by such investigators as Rep. John Conyers, Mark Crispin Miller, Bob Fitrakis, Harvey Wasserman, Bev Harris, and others. Here is an overview of what they have reported, along with observations of my own.

Some 105 million citizens voted in 2000, but in 2004 the turnout climbed to at least 122 million. Pre-election surveys indicated that among the record 16.8 million new voters Kerry was a heavy favorite, a fact that went largely unreported by the press. In addition, there were about two million progressives who had voted for Ralph Nader in 2000 who switched to Kerry in 2004.

Yet the official 2004 tallies showed Bush with 62 million votes, about 11.6 million more than he got in 2000. Meanwhile Kerry showed only eight million more votes than Gore received in 2000. To have achieved his remarkable 2004 tally, Bush would needed to have kept all his 50.4 million from 2000, plus a majority of the new voters, plus a large share of the very liberal Nader defectors.

Read more.

0 replies on “Great overview of the Big Theft”

Mark, I have a question.

Parenti mentions Miami County and an impossibly high vote count. I commented to him that although that does appear in the Conyers report, Paul Krugman has more recently dismissed that as erroneous. I believe it’s very important that we make every effort to cleanse the mistakes from the record and focus on the unambiguous evidence of electoral mischief that is out there.

As you know, I try to focus on Florida, where I am already about three years behind. So I don’t whether/how this issue has been resolved. Do you know?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.