From Manjoo’s Salon article: “For instance, in the Bush strongholds — where the average completion rate (of exit poll surveys) was 56 percent — it’s possible that only 53 percent of those who voted for Bush were willing to be polled, while people who voted for Kerry participated at a higher 59 percent rate. Meanwhile, in the Kerry strongholds, where Mitofsky found a 53 percent average completion rate, it’s possible that Bush voters participated 50 percent of the time, while Kerry voters were willing to be interviewed 56 percent of the time. In this scenario, the averages work out to the same ones Kennedy cited: a 56 percent average response rate in Bush strongholds, and a 53 percent average response rate in Kerry strongholds. But in both Bush strongholds and Kerry strongholds, Kerry voters would have been responding at a higher rate, skewing the poll toward Kerry.”
From Michael Collins’s Scoop critique of Manjoo: “This critical paragraph consists of simple verbal calculations, plus or minus three. There is nothing else there except Manjoo’s words surrounding numbers which conveniently counter the statistical and mathematical analyses Kennedy cites. This is simply amazing. Meaningless words and numbers are produced to refute Kennedy’s sources without any basis whatsoever. None. The run on sentences above are based entirely on the phrase “it’s possible.”
Jonathan Simon comments:
Of course the illogic of the Manjoo math above is even worse than Collins’s description of it. The averaging that Manjoo indulges in (59K + 53B / 2 = 56 in Bush strongholds and 56K + 50B / 2 = 53 in Kerry strongholds), would be possible only if there were an equal number of Kerry and Bush voters–that is, if K = B–in each set of strongholds. By definition, the strongholds represented unequal (in fact >80/20) divisions of Kerry and Bush voters (hence “strongholds”), so Manjoo’s facile averaging is false, and is in fact mathematical nonsense, as would be obvious to a pre-algebra middle school student. It was in fact extremely difficult, if not impossible, to make the data given by Edison/Mitofsky fit the “reluctant responder” hypothesis, though the debate on whether it was technically possible or not rested on genuine mathematical analysis of a fairly high order, rather than the garbage thrown into the pot by Manjoo.
What is particularly aggravating about this is that legitimate calculations of actual rigor have been being carried out by many of us since literally seconds after the release of the relevant data in January 2005, grappling with the fairly complex mathematical challenges posed by an incomplete data set. All this was public and available to Manjoo, had he cared to look it up. For him to attempt to disparage Kennedy’s analysis (and that of the rest of the analysts who have worked long and hard) by using simplistic, false and inane arithmetic (for pete’s sake), reveals either an unconscionable shoddiness of analysis and argument or a driving motive to disparage without letting either facts or basic math get in the way (and unfortunately this shoot-from-the-hip-while-talking-on-a-cell-phone utter absence of rigor characterizes Manjoo’s attack at many other points as well).
In either case, Manjoo owes not only Kennedy, but the rest of us who have devoted our energies to this task, a retraction and an apology.
No Comments to “Jonathan Simon weighs in on the SCOOP rebuttal”
“While We Were Sleeping”
Orwell Rolls In His Grave, featuring MCM – Buy the DVD
About News From Underground
News From Underground is a daily e-news service run by Mark Crispin Miller, a Professor of Culture and Communication at NYU. It is based on his belief that academics, like reporters, have a civic obligation to help keep the people well-informed, so that American democracy might finally work.
If you'd like to receive updates delivered to your inbox daily, sign up for News From Underground Alerts:
Help News From Underground!
Message from Mark: "I am a one-man operation, although assisted greatly by some volunteers, and, now and then, by people paid by others for one-time projects. There is no shortage of skilled, dedicated folks out there who want to help me. There is, however, nothing I can pay them with, unless you decide you can contribute something."
Please donate via the PayPal button above or via PayPal by email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- How Australia plans to keep its vaccinated children safe from illnesses that they can’t catch
- On the mass delusion now afflicting liberals (and putting all of us at risk)
- There’s actually more evidence in Pizzagate than there is in “Russia-gate.”
- NYU is built for WAR! (Who knew?)
- HuffPost ran this strong defense of Bobby Kennedy, Jr.—then took it down just minutes later.
- Contact Lou Dobbs on
- Forbidden Bookshelf on
- Top US spooks see NO “conclusive evidence” of Russian hacking in Election 2016 on
- How blaming Trump’s “election” on the Russians could force Hillary on us after all—and end US democracy for good… on
- Election theft in Michigan and Florida may have been more dramatic than we think… on
- The strange death of Nancy Schaefer (two items)
- There's actually more evidence in Pizzagate than there is in "Russia-gate."
- Don't buy these products from Koch Industries!
- Forbidden Bookshelf
- Where the money goes at NYU
- Suburban Guerrilla
- Veterans for Common Sense
- Writers Voice
- Words of Power
- t r u t h o u t
- Early America
- William Betz
- Election Defense Alliance
- Thom Hartmann
- alias Bruce
- Citizens for Legitimate Government
- Richard Charnin
- Mainstream Baptist
- The Rude Pudit
- Cody Lyon
- Media Channel
- Media Matters
Need a bigger font size?
- Your link could be here too, contact us for pricing details.