More on WHYY and NPR

Dear Mr. Miller,

Someone forwarded me an e-mail about how WHYY had blocked you from buying an underwriting message. I want you to know that I had a similar experience with that station. In 1999, their then general manager, agreed to air a portion of my annual radio broadcast about homelessness. A few days later, she renegged and denied even having made the commitment. I might add that in the nine years I’ve been doing the show, three other station have renegged, and all of them have been major NPR stations. This kind of thing has never happened to me anywhere else.

In 2002, I wrote a couple of columns about this phenomenon, and I’ve pasted-on the 2nd of them below. I hope you wil find it of interest.

By the way, in our case, we’re doing better and better with NPR stations as they realize the roof doesn’t cave in when one of them airs us. But someone promoting a book or trying to get coverage for a news story would not be able to invest the years it has taken us to get this far.


Jeremy Weir Alderson
Director, Homelessness Marathon

“The NPR Nobody Knows”

In my last column I suggested boycotting the pledge drives of those NPR stations that ignore the poor (of course, the ones doing a good job in this regard should be supported, instead). And while there are surely many factors forming the NPR ethos, I did imply that sometimes there may be an inverse correlation between the size of a station’s budget and the size of its soul — a point I’d like to expand on.

If you go to NPR’s web site and search the archive of its national broadcasts (“Morning Edition,” “Talk of the Nation,” “All Things Considered,” etc.), you’ll find that 339 stories mentioned poverty, which is more than twice as many as the 147 which mentioned “wealth.” I don’t think, though, that this is because NPR’s focus is more on the poor than the rich. Rather, I think that NPR so thoroughly sees through the eyes of wealth that it’s just a matter of not wanting to preen — Noblesse Oblige
and all that.

If poor people really ran NPR, you’d be seeing more stories on wealth than on poverty, and a lot of them would have themes like, “Wealth: How Much Should Rich People Be Allowed To Keep?” Besides, when you look at the details of NPR’s story selection, it’s easy to see the devil in them.

The issue of “Homelessness,” for example, was touched on only a total of 30 times on every NPR network show put together, going back to at least 1994. That’s the same number of stories as were done on “Martha Stewart” or “jewelry.” And we can say with a certain mathematical precision that NPR paid more attention to “aliens” (188 stories), “dogs” (212 stories) and “fish” (490 stories) than it did to “homeless people” (27 stories). Similarly, NPR featured 81 stories touching on “mansions”
and 73 on “castles,” but only 47 on “public housing” and 13 on “homeless shelters.”

Just by some kawinky-dink, four out of NPR’s five highest paid staffers are corporate marketers, according to NPR’s IRS 990 form. In 2000, these employees were: Bob Edwards, senior host, $242,411 in salary and benefits; John Gilmore, Director Corporate Marketing, $240,801; Kent Martin, National Representative Corporate Marketing, $232,734; Blake Truitt, Manager Corporate Marketing, $205,238 and Connie Mongroo, Co-Director Corporate Marketing, $191,299 (does Mongroo make less than employees with seemingly lower titles because she’s a woman?). Kevin Klose, NPR’s President and CEO, was paid a measly $228,322 in salary and benefits, but then again, he also received an additional $76,665 for his “expense account and other allowances.”

The pay scales are also very high at some of the NPR member stations, even though this isn’t a field where you have to pay through the nose to get talent. There’s a whole universe of people working at college, Christian, community, Pacifica and NPR-affiliated stations who are long on dedication and short on material rewards. The “Homelessness Marathon,” for instance, started on WEOS in Geneva, NY, an NPR affiliate where the entire operating budget, including equipment and the G.M.’s salary, was under $100,000 (though as a college licensee, it did get free studio space, heat and light, worth some additional thousands). In 1999, KUSP, the NPR station in Santa Cruz, CA, which, by the way, has done a lot for the marathon, had no employee making over $50,000, and the broadcast director of Texas Public Radio, which, by the way, has done nothing for the marathon, made $53,978.

Compare those figures with some from NPR stations on the other side of the class divide (all figures from 1999 or 2000):
Employee Title Station/Org. Salary & Benefits
Laura Walker Pres. & CEO WNYC, New York $361,119
W. Marrazzo Pres. & CEO WHYY, Philadelphia* $314,415
H. Becton, Jr. Pres. & GM WGBH, Boston* $286,087
George Miles Pres. & CEO WQED, Pittsburgh* $234,727
Mary Bitterman Pres. & CEO KQED, San Fran.* $219,062
William Kling President Minn. Pub. Radio $185,063
Maynard Orme Pres. & CEO Oregon Pub. Broad.* $177,952

(* = broadcasts television too)

You may be able to find out the top salaries at a public station near you by going to and seeing if it’s listed or by writing to the station and requesting a copy of its 990 form. What that form says makes no difference to the station’s moral obligation to serve all the public, including poor people. But stations that pay hefty salaries may be particularly vulnerable to a campaign demanding they be interested in lifestyles besides their own.

I’m concerned that, because I’ve raised this issue, there may be prejudice against the “Homelessness Marathon” at some NPR stations, and surely any group that challenges one of these imperious behemoths will have to worry about losing valuable coverage. But I am reminded of the lunch-counter sit-ins of the civil rights movement. They were protesting inside the very establishments where they hoped to eat.

NPR newsrooms are the new lunch counters. Let’s demand to be served.

0 replies on “More on WHYY and NPR”

The fact that the regime’s tentacles extend to censoring ballot fraud information on NPR, highlights its fundamental importance as an issue. The truth must be suppressed or the game is up for them, bigtime.

Remain steadfast,MCM, you and your supporters/allies have got THE big one by the horns. The fate of American Democracy rests on the outcome.

What we need here is a spark. How about a mock book burning outside the NPR HQ for starters. “These people are behaving like Nazis”. Invite everybody, shoot a doco. Invole Christians by pointing out how “That Diebold Devil is stealing Democracy’s soul”. Creative street theatre, lots of sizzle. People dressed up in Satan and Nazi costumes holding placards, while suits punch home the grabs to a wide eyed heartland.

The suffragettes chained themselves up in prominent places to get their messge out. Sure it was a stunt, but it worked a treat.These women fought for their democratic rights to the limits of their wit an physical courage. Will America?

Excellent ideas and message of spirit. It’s that threatening feeling of isolation and lack of solidarity to act that keeps people “chained” to their timidity. Depends on where you live…some places I’m sure are ripe for protest and change, with many simply waiting for the shoe to drop so they can jump on board. And that’s always the decisive point, isn’t it? Who will act on the courage of their convictions first? Because once it’s underway, many will stand up for the cause.

There’s so many stumbling blocks in place, so many inducements to lull people back into apathy. Unfortunately, the publicity stunts and protests you’re describing would sound to many people, as Chomsky would say, as though you’ve ‘taken off from the planet.’ It’s difficult gage any speculation, from area to area, as to how many actually recognize the real threat of fascism. If most erroneously see the past 5 yrs as “politics as usual,” then they’re still asleep, foolishly believing that the only personal inconvenience they need suffer in order to bring about change is to return to the voting booth. That’s the brilliance of the fascism that has taken hold here – the entire system of belief structures and values has made it nigh impossible for average folks to even know how to correctly acknowledge the situation, much less have the wherewithal to confront it. And I don’t exclude myself from that criticism.

Am I eligible for a rhinoplasty procedure even though Im positive for Hepatitis b.? Although I had it for only two years and it’s not severe.Does it affect my eligibility.THANKS!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.