New Method for Flagging Vote Miscount Released — Specific Type of Statistical Analysis Can Indicate Vote Count Errors in Past and Future Elections
(PRWEB) January 16, 2006 — After over a year of research, the National Election Data Archive (NEDA) has developed a new sophisticated statistical method for indicating whether reported vote counts in any particular election race between two candidates have, or have not, been counted correctly. The method is being made publicly available on the Internet “Vote Miscount or Exit Poll Error? New Mathematical Function for Analyzing Exit Poll Discrepancy”, is publicly available at [this link] and will enable independent analysts to objectively evaluate the validity of any past or future election results…
NEDA will shortly be releasing a report using this analysis method for Ohio’s 2004 presidential election. It will provide striking support for corrupted Ohio vote counts of sufficient magnitude to reverse the outcome of the election. [Emphasis added.]
The National Election Data Archive (NEDA) is a nonprofit organization of statisticians and mathematicians devoted to the accuracy of U.S. vote counts. NEDA is currently seeking support to build a national public election data archive to make detailed precinct-level vote-type election data available for immediate post-election independent analysis of voting patterns.
Lots more really good stuff at MakeThemAccountable.com.
Philosophical question: If a Bush commits a crime and no one hears about it, has a crime really been committed?