Dear Howard Dean: Why Bother?

December 13, 2005
By Ernest Partridge, The Crisis Papers

December 13, 2005
Dr. Howard Dean, Chair
Democratic National Committee

Dear Dr. Dean,

Every week I get dozens of solicitations from the Democratic National Committee, from the Democratic Senate and Congressional Campaign Committees, or from various Democratic candidates and office-holders, each of them asking for contributions. “You can help us achieve victory next November,” I am told.

If by “victory” is meant a majority vote cast at the polls, then the Democrats achieved “victory” in 2000, 2002 and 2004. And yet, the Republicans remain in control of the Congress and the White House.

Small wonder! Republicans build the voting machines, Republicans write the secret software, Republicans count and compile the totals. The Republican machines allow no auditing of the vote totals they report. So Republicans have the ability to “win” elections, regardless of the will of the voters. There is compelling evidence that they have done just that.

Read more.

No Comments to “Wake up, Dr. Dean”

  • Mark — you are SO right. How can we get the mainstream media to cover this voting machine scandal? Are they completely in the hands of progagandists? Thank you for all your hard work and brilliant writing. Can’t wait to read your book. By the way, Brad of has the latest expose on Diebold and the voting machine horrors (as you know.)
    xo Lydia

  • Oooo boy. One fever swamp website professor just blogged on another fever swamp professor’s page. Lunatics talking to lunatics. And they are both teaching our kids, that’s what so scary about the whole thing. That’s okay, you will just continue to alienate more swing voters. And that will guarantee the socialists will never come to power.

  • Regarding the prior post: I do so get a bang out of reading the semi-retarded drivel of bloodlusting fascists. It broadens ones mind.

    However…when will people realize that there’s a good chance that many of the “left’s” prominent figures are only serving their respective role in the bigger ‘divide and rule’ scheme/strategy?

    All fine and well to point out the obvious about the war profiteering corporations that own and operate mainline media; clearly the dem’s P.O.V. will be intentionally downplayed and skewered.

    However… at what point do begin to see the dems criticisms of the Right as playing into and along with a broader strategy? To me, it seems far more implausible, far fetched and ludicrous for the dems to persist with the whole “the Right is incompetent” line, when compared to the reality that, given how time after time, with issue after issue and scandal upon scandal, there is CLEARLY an underlying plot, an ulterior agenda being carried out, that tens of millions have figured it out even if there are varying schools of thought regarding the specifics, yet the dems continue to play ball w/the Right by NOT stating what should be obvious to a child.

    “Conspiracy” theorists to the left, “coincidence” theorists to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you…

    List of potential terror targets is late
    By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY

    WASHINGTON — The Homeland Security Department is more than a year behind in creating a list of chemical plants, bridges, skyscrapers and other vulnerable sites that could become terrorist targets if plans aren’t made to protect them.

    Rep. Bennie Thompson blasts delay, calling it “appalling.”
    By Chip Somodevilla, Getty Images

    President Bush ordered the plan to be completed by December 2004.

    A year after that deadline and nearly three years after the department was created to protect the nation against terrorism, officials still don’t have a workable database of possible targets.

    The former commission that investigated the 9/11 attacks released a report card this month that rated the government’s anti-terrorism security, and vulnerabilities assessment got a near-failing grade.

    Rep. Dan Lungren, a California Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee, says he’s frustrated by the lack of progress. Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., the top Democrat on the committee, calls it “appalling” that the plan isn’t done yet.

    Homeland Security Infrastructure Protection chief Robert Stephan, the man in charge of the plan, blames his predecessors for bungling the job and says he will have it done early next year. A draft of a plan to protect the nation’s most vulnerable sites was recently completed.

    Stephan, who took over in April, told Congress recently that when he looked at the work done on the project before he was put in charge, “a sinking feeling rapidly came over me.”

    Stephan did not discuss details of the classified database of possible targets, which is kept secret so terrorists can’t find out more about sites considered vulnerable to attack. Members of Congress say early versions included mini-golf courses and water parks but didn’t include some key sites, including parts of the New Orleans levee system.

    “It’s pathetic,” says Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., also a member of the Homeland Security committee. “This was supposed to be the critical infrastructure list, and it’s the kitchen sink.”

    Stephan says there are 80,000 sites in the database and he’s going through them to determine what should be left on and what should be taken off. “That thing really got under my skin,” he says.

    But he says it’s not useless, even in its present form.

    When it’s done, the list will be used to help federal officials set priorities for permanent security protections that should be put in place. It will guide private industry and state and local governments about how to beef up security at their businesses and in their towns. (Related story: Police want guides on quarantine rules)

    It also can be used, as it was in 2004 when officials reported a threat against financial institutions in New York, New Jersey and Washington, D.C., to identify sites and people who need to be contacted.

    Stephan says the list was used more recently when New Orleans flooded to identify chemical plants, refineries, bridges and other important sites that had been wiped out or damaged.

    He says the “mini-golf courses and bowling alleys” have all been taken off the list.

    In October, during a hearing on the plan and database, Lungren told Stephan, “We have heard, you know, this plan’s going to be coming out, it’s going to be coming out, it’s going to be coming out. We tend to look with a little skepticism.”

    Now, Lungren says he’s pleased some progress is being made.

    Thompson is skeptical of the project’s value. “The National Infrastructure Protection Plan strikes me as another governmental document doomed to be more of an intellectual exercise than a practical provider of security,” he says. “I’m afraid it will likely sit on a bureaucrat’s shelf next to the dozen or so other national strategies gathering dust and doing little to secure America.”

    Translation: they – meaning people within our government and military – haven’t quite figured out which “event” to green-light next to further usher in the next draconian phase of the complete National Security state takeover.

    Or you can choose to remain on the grey fence of ignorance and chalk this up to yet further so-called “incompetence.”

    Think about it: these fascists are backed into a corner, the mainline propaganda no longer works as it did a few yrs ago – to the point where in order to secure some remaining percentage of dwindling viewership they’re implementing carefully framed propaganda that appears to be critical of the admin. – so you know that we’re do for a little “reminder” of this “never ending global war on terror.”

    And what better way to scare the shit outta everyone and get em to SHUT UP about the admin, the CIA/Wilson/Plame leak indictment, the pentagon spying on us, the corporate cronyism, Diabold – fucking DIABOLIC – the illegal, lowballing pretext for invading Iraq, the plumetting ratings for everything associated with this admin and it’s party of venomous loons, than to forever silence any and all concerns over everything by sraging another counterfeit “terrorist” attack… one which will unfortunately, probably, given the back-pedalling they require, dwarf the heinous, treasonous crimes of 9/11.


    Swallow these LIES y’all keep swallowin’
    Swat em like flies now, keep followin’
    Sheep to lead
    Ethos of greed’s grim, he’s smirkin’, see?
    Hateful screed for new century
    Be enslaved
    Shoes are too large, y’all ain’t fillin’ em
    Cook up some wars, y’all keep killin’ em
    Travesty as usual

    He’s your peace, he’s your state of mind
    Graven image idolize
    Based on cold ideology
    Face of lies and hypocrisy
    Preacher’s blood soaked diamond mines
    Robot judge who will undermine
    Travesty as usual

    ~ The Hidden Hand, Travesty As Usual

  • That figures. If I disagree with somebody from the extreme left, he or she immediately calls me “retarded” and “a fascist”. Keep it up with the intolerance; you just lost another handful of swing voters.

  • And yet you typically overlook how you yourself actually began the mud-tossing by referring to Mark and Lydia as “luatics.”

    That figures.

    Nor are you able to refute any of the points I made.

    That figures.

    And “swing” voters? Ha, oh man..if you’re still sitting on the fence at this point, you are rock. fucking. dumb. I mean, horrendously, astonishingly, embarrassingly stupid.

    And it’s the ignorance of such blind-faither mouth-breathers that has done so much to ruin it for everyone, especially all those devestated or murdered in direct relation to the PLOT which has unfolded over the last five years.

    Naturally, making such observations is, according to “anoymous,” akin to “intollerance.”

    I happen to believe it would do all various strains of the ‘left’ to come down from their PC high horse and begin addressing this Rightist movement in specific terms. I’m all for peaceful resolutions and communicative articulation…however, when confronting rubes like you who come here and attack anonymously – you know, typical, Right wing PUSSY bullshit – you should be answered.

    Oh sure, the more “mature” approach would be to ignore you and hope you disappear, but that’s exactly the typical ‘left’ strategy that has failed miserably in addressing the unprecedented crime and institutional treason of this current administration. There’s plenty of dems and even traditional republicans to make a stand and shut this down, but they won’t, and there’s simply no way I’m buying that they won’t because they’re all ‘too scared.’

    Bullshit; they’re all complicit. They knew beforehand that this was the INTENDED way for the country to move, with all the legal and constitutional maneuvering around self-afflicted “terrorism” which began being staged in the early 90s, around the time Bush sr. gave his New World Order speech on 9/11/90.

  • No, pal, They are not f***ing dumb or embarassingly stupid. They just disagree with you 100%. And I have been refuting these conspiracy claims for months now. There goes a few more swing voters. Keep jabbering away. I’m having fun watching this meltdown.

  • Okay…then, given that you’re apparently “on top” of all this, please enlighten me as to why Twin Tower complex owner, Larry Silverstein, admitted in a PBS documentary {I own it, seen it many times} that on 9/11, “they” decided to “pull” tower #7, meaning, bring down a forty-seven story building via controlled demolition…which, I might add, requires weeks of advance planning. It’s not something done spur of the moment with complete disregard for public safety, which I assure you, was not at the forefront of concerns by those within our own government and military who orchestrated the crimes of 9/11 as a needed pretext to bolster public support for expansion of empire.

    And then, please do explain why the 9/11 Commission, the one that the Bush Inc admin fought tooth and nail to prevent from coming into existence, among many other things, FAILED TO EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE IN THEIR REPORT. Yes, that’s right; a forty-seven story building, collapsing at free-fall speed, apparently didn’t warrant examination from this “commission.”

    While you’re at it, give me your take on the PNAC, and their open calling for 9/11, “a new Pearl Harbor,” published in their 2001 paper,”Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” just several months pre 9/11, after the successful 2000 coup.

    Go on now, master refuter, refute away…..…WITH FACTS, please, and not mere conjecture based on your propagandized perception of Bush as a media persona. If you want me to provide legitimate links, I will.

    Good luck.

  • Top Politicians, Economists, Other Leaders
    State 9/11 Possibly an Inside Job:

    Former Chief Economist under President Bush, Morgan Reynolds

    Assistant Secretary of Treasury under Pres. Reagan, Paul Roberts

    U.S. Senator Mark Dayton

    U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney

    Renowned Theologian Prof. David Ray Griffin

    Head of Advanced Space Programs, Dept. of Defense, Robert Bowman

    UK Minister of Environment (1997 – 2003), Michael Meacher

    Assistant Secretary of Housing For Pres. Bush, Catherine Austin Fitts

    9/11 statement signed by 100 prominent Americans, 40 9/11 family members

    Sept. 8, 2005
    Dear friends,

    When four planes tragically crashed four years ago on September 11th, the course of history was inalterably changed. Yet questions about what actually happened on that fateful day are asked with increasing frequency, even by some top government officials and other respected public leaders. Read the statements below (links to sources provided) from a former chief economist of President George W. Bush, an assistant secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, a current U.S. Senator, a sitting Congresswoman, a renowned theologian, the head of advanced space programs for the Department of Defense under Reagan, a British cabinet minister under Prime Minister Tony Blair, and more.

    Each of these prominent leaders now claims that there are serious problems with the official government story of 9/11. Some of these highly respected individuals even believe that 9/11 may have been an inside job. It can be very uncomfortable to even consider the possibility that certain individuals within government were involved either in allowing the attacks to happen, or in some way facilitating them in order to forward their hidden agendas. Yet the facts increasingly point in that direction.

    The mainstream media has sadly failed to give significant coverage to the serious questions being raised by these public figures. We invite you to have the courage to listen to their words and explore this vital topic, and then to share this powerful information with your friends. If we act now, we can powerfully work together to call for a truly independent investigation and to strengthen democracy in our nation and our world. For an abundance of reliable, verifiable information revealing key facts on 9/11 and what we can do about it, don’t miss our compelling 9/11 Information Center at Thanks for caring, and may we build a brighter future for ourselves and for our future generations.

    With best wishes,
    Fred Burks for the Team
    Former language interpreter for Presidents Bush and Clinton.

    Morgan Reynolds, Former Chief Economist under President Bush
    June 13, 2005, Washington Times/ UPI

    A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush’s first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is “bogus” and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. – More on Reynolds

    “If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an ‘inside job’ and a government attack on America would be compelling,” said Morgan Reynolds, Ph.D, a former member of the Bush team. Reynolds, now a professor emeritus at Texas A&M University, also believes it’s “next to impossible” that 19 Arab terrorists alone outfoxed the mighty U.S. military, adding the scientific conclusions about the WTC collapse may hold the key to the entire mysterious plot behind 9/11. Reynolds…claims explosives and structural experts have been intimidated in their analyses of the collapses of 9/11. In a detailed analysis just released supporting the controlled demolition theory, Reynolds presents a compelling case.

    Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Sect. of Treasury under Pres. Reagan – Website of Stanford’s Hoover Institute describes Roberts

    The Honorable Paul Craig Roberts is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. During 1981–82, he served as assistant secretary of the Treasury for economic policy. He was awarded the Treasury Department’s Meritorious Service Award for “his outstanding contributions to the formulation of United States economic policy.” A former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business Week…the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of its top seven journalists. He has testified before committees of Congress on 30 occasions. – Las Vegas Tribune’s July 29, 2005 article on Roberts

    Roberts said he hasn’t changed his political ideology or jumped from the Republican-conservative ship but “just can’t respect a party leadership who doesn’t respect the truth.” “I guess the real story about 9/11 is about what the people are actually saying. I’ve gotten hundreds of emails in response to my columns and many of them talk about not getting the truth from the government or the media about what really happened at the World Trade Center. I know many qualified engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions credibility.”

    U.S. Senator Mark Dayton
    July 31, 2004, The Star-Tribune (Minneapolis – St. Paul)

    Sen. Mark Dayton, D-Minn., charged…that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) have covered up “catastrophic failures” that left the nation vulnerable during the Sept. 11 hijackings. “For almost three years now, NORAD officials and FAA officials have been able to hide their critical failures that left this country defenseless during two of the worst hours in our history,” Dayton declared during a Senate Governmental Affairs Committee hearing. Dayton said NORAD officials “lied to the American people, they lied to Congress and they lied to your 9/11 commission to create a false impression of competence, communication and protection of the American people.”

    U.S. Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney
    July 23, 2005, Atlanta Journal-Constitution (Atlanta’s leading newspaper) – Copy on if above link fails

    Rep. Cynthia McKinney led a Capitol Hill hearing Friday [July 22, 2005] on whether the Bush administration was involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. “What we are doing is asking the unanswered questions of the 9/11 families,” McKinney…said during the proceedings. The eight-hour hearing, timed to mark the first anniversary of the release of the Sept. 11 commission’s report on the attacks, drew dozens of contrarians and conspiracy theorists who suggest President Bush purposely ignored warnings or may even have had a hand in the attack — claims participants said the commission ignored. “Congresswoman McKinney is viewed as a contrarian,” panelist Melvin Goodman, a former CIA official, said. “And I hope someday her views will be considered conventional wisdom.”

    Note: Though the mainstream press largely failed to report on this important hearing, C-SPAN did air all eight hours of testimony given on August 31s
    t and Sept. 2nd (because of Hu
    rricane Katrina, part two was aired on C-SPAN 2), both at 8 PM.

    Professor David Ray Griffin, Renowned Theologian in LA Times
    August 28, 2005, Los Angeles Times,1,3835884.story – Copy on if above link fails

    A professor emeritus at the Claremont School of Theology, 66-year-old David Ray Griffin…compiled a summary of material arguing against the accepted story that 19 hijackers sent by Osama bin Laden took the aviation system and the U.S. military by surprise that awful day in his 2004 book “The New Pearl Harbor.” He recently followed up with the book “The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions,” a critique of the Kean commission document. “For the first year and a half I just accepted the conventional view. When a colleague suggested to me about a year after 9/11 that he was convinced our own government or forces within our own government had arranged it, I didn’t accept that. Then several months later another colleague sent me [a link to] a website that had a timeline. Once I started reading that and saw all those stories drawn from mainstream sources that contradicted the official account, I decided I needed to look into it more carefully, and the more I looked, the worse it got. The fact that Building 7 [a 47-story skyscraper in the WTC complex] collapsed when it had not been hit by an airplane, and collapsed in seven or eight seconds, that’s a smoking gun. The fact that standard operating procedures were not followed that morning, and we’ve gotten three different stories now by the U.S. military as to why they did not intercept the planes, that’s a smoking gun. There was a Zogby poll in New York. The question asked was, do you believe the government had advance knowledge of the attacks and consciously let them happen? Forty-nine percent in New York City said yes.

    Note: On May 7, 2005, Dr. Griffin, who has authored or edited over two dozen scholarly books, was featured on C-SPAN 2 giving an excellent lecture on the 9/11 cover-up at the University of Wisconsin. To view this revealing lecture free online, click here. The prestigious National Press Club also hosted him for an excellent talk on July 22, 2005. To read a transcript of this speech, click here. For more on Dr. Giffin, click here.

    Robert M. Bowman, Head of Advanced Space Programs for DOD – Illinois Times on Bowman

    In 1977, Dr. Robert M. Bowman, head of advanced space programs for the Department of Defense [DOD], authored a report describing a new missile-defense shield system called the “Star Wars Defense.” Lt. Col. Robert Bowman (Ret.), a combat pilot who flew 101 missions in the Vietnam War…ran for president in 2000. – Article on Dr. Bowman’s website discussing 9/11

    Many people are convinced that George W. Bush knew what was going to happen and purposely allowed it to happen so he and his neo-conservative buddies could have the “new Pearl Harbor” they needed to justify their wars against Afghanistan and Iraq. Others go further. They are absolutely sure Cheney and company actually planned and carried out the attack. What is so disturbing is that their arguments are quite convincing. If an enormous cloud of suspicion is not to be permanently over the head of our government, the Bush Administration must “come clean,” releasing information thus far withheld from the American people. Why did John Ashcroft and top Pentagon officials cancel plans to fly commercial airlines the morning of 9/11? If they knew what was about to happen, why wasn’t it stopped? Who made all the millions of dollars selling short United and American Airlines [stock] just before 9/11? Why weren’t the hijacked airliners intercepted by jet fighters and shot down before they could fly into the WTC and Pentagon? What did the air traffic controllers say, and to whom? Why did the FBI impound the tapes of those conversations? Why has the public never been told what was on them? Why weren’t the congressional investigators told? If it was just a matter of incompetence or somebody not doing their job, why hasn’t anyone been fired or reprimanded?

    Michael Meacher, UK Minister of Environment (1997 – 2003)
    September 6, 2003, The Guardian (one of the UK’s leading newspapers),3604,1036571,00.html

    A blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld’s deputy), Jeb Bush (George Bush’s younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney’s chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America’s Defences, was written in September 2000 by the neoconservative think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC). The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defence of incompetence. Fifteen of the 9/11 hijackers obtained their visas in Saudi Arabia. Michael Springman, the former head of the American visa bureau in Jeddah, has stated that since 1987 the CIA had been illicitly issuing visas to unqualified applicants from the Middle East and bringing them to the US for training in terrorism for the Afghan war in collaboration with Bin Laden (BBC, November 6 2001). It seems this operation continued after the Afghan war for other purposes. It is also reported that five of the hijackers received training at secure US military installations in the 1990s (Newsweek, September 15 2001) The conclusion of all this analysis must surely be that the “global war on terrorism” has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda – the US goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project.

    Catherine Austin Fitts, Ass. Sect. of Housing For President Bush – Wikipedia article describing Fitts

    Catherine Austin Fitts has been a Wall Street executive, a government official, and President of her own investment bank. She is currently the director of Solari. Fitts served as Managing Director and Member of the Board of Directors of the Wall Street investment bank, Dillon, Read & Co., Inc. and also as Assistant Secretary of Housing/Federal Housing Commissioner at HUD in the first Bush Administration.
    Article jointly written by Catherine Austin Fitts and Congresswoman McKinney on excellent 9/11 website

    From the first, the Bush Administration resisted investigation and disclosure. Families of September 11 victims were forced to lobby the administration and Congress for a full and independent inquiry. They fought for 14 months, blocked every step of the way by the White House. The families demanded a full investigation, posing nearly 400 questions to the Kean Commission. The commissioners said they welcomed these queries. But their final report ignored most of the unanswered questions. Still posted on the website of the September 11 Family Steering Committee, these questions are a stark reminder of the Kean Commission’s failures. Until the unanswered questions about 9/11 are laid to rest, by a truly independent investigation that does not declare legitimate avenues of inquiry off-limits, they will continue to haunt our country.

    Respected Leaders and Families 9/11 Truth Statement
    October 26, 2004,

    An alliance of 100 prominent Americans and 40 family members of those killed on 9/11 announced the release of the 911 Truth Statement, a call for immediate inquiry into evidence that suggests high-level governme
    nt officials may have deliberately allowed t
    he September 11th attacks to occur. The Statement’s list of signatories includes notables spanning the political spectrum, from Presidential candidates Ralph Nader, Michael Badnarik, and David Cobb to Catherine Austin Fitts, a member of the first Bush administration, as well as Washington veterans like Pentagon whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg and retired CIA analyst Ray McGovern. Other signers range from peace activists like Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans and Global Exchange’s Kevin Danaher to former US Ambassador and Chief of Mission to Iraq, Edward L. Peck; from environmentalists like Randy Hayes and John Robbins to business leaders such as Paul Hawken and Karl Schwarz, CEO of Patmos Nanotechnologies; from populist journalist Ronnie Dugger to renowned investigative reporter Kelly Patricia O’Meara. The Statement also includes 43 noted authors, including New York Times #1 bestseller John Gray, as well as 18 eminent professors, historians, and theologians. Other notables include five-term Georgia Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, singers Michelle Shocked and Michael Franti, and actors Ed Asner and Mimi Kennedy.

    If we are willing to explore what really happened on 9/11 and to work together to bring the facts to light, we can make a difference. For more reliable, verifiable information on this vital topic, don’t miss

    Final Note: Remember that with your help, we can and will build a brighter future for us all. And for some deeply inspiring stories to provide balance to all of this:

    See our archive of revealing 9/11 news articles:

  • Naturally, mums the word.

Post comment

Forbidden Bookshelf

Forbidden Bookshelf

“While We Were Sleeping”

While We Were Sleeping is an urgent call to save Greenwich Village from New York University's uncontrolled expansion.

Click here to donate to NYUFASP and receive a copy of "While We Were Sleeping: NYU and the Destruction of New York" (minimum donation to receive a book is $10 plus $8 shipping).

Orwell Rolls In His Grave, featuring MCM – Buy the DVD

About News From Underground

News From Underground is a daily e-news service run by Mark Crispin Miller, a Professor of Culture and Communication at NYU. It is based on his belief that academics, like reporters, have a civic obligation to help keep the people well-informed, so that American democracy might finally work.

If you'd like to receive updates delivered to your inbox daily, sign up for News From Underground Alerts:

Help News From Underground!

Message from Mark: "I am a one-man operation, although assisted greatly by some volunteers, and, now and then, by people paid by others for one-time projects. There is no shortage of skilled, dedicated folks out there who want to help me. There is, however, nothing I can pay them with, unless you decide you can contribute something."

Please donate via the PayPal button above or via PayPal by email to:

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Popular Posts


Need a bigger font size?

Sponsored Links

  • Your link could be here too, contact us for pricing details.