Alito is the wrong man for the job

Alito defended government wiretap rights
Reagan-era memo said attorney general should be immune from lawsuits
The Associated Press
Dec. 23, 2005

WASHINGTON – Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito defended the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps when he worked for the Reagan Justice Department, documents released Friday show.

He advocated a step-by-step approach to strengthening the hand of officials in a 1984 memo to the solicitor general. The strategy is similar to the one that Alito espoused for rolling back abortion rights at the margins.

The release of the memo by the National Archives comes when President Bush is under fire for secretly ordering domestic spying of suspected terrorists without a warrant. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., has promised to question Alito about the administration’s program.

The Associated Press had requested documents related to Alito under the Freedom of Information Act.

The memo dealt with whether government officials should have blanket protection from lawsuits when authorizing wiretaps. “I do not question that the attorney general should have this immunity,” Alito wrote. “But for tactical reasons, I would not raise the issue here.”

Read more.

0 thoughts on “Alito is the wrong man for the job”

  1. We must never forget why we have people like Alito nominated. MCP, thank you for every thing you’ve done and are doing for election integrity.

    Michael Collins/autorank

    Kerry Won!!! Statistical Tools Everyone Can Use

    The 2004 Election Controversy will not stop. Statistical analysis of polls is now more accessible with free interactive Excel-based election models available on the Internet. *Plus an interview with TruthIsAll.*

    Special for “Scoop” Independent Media from Washington DC

    Michael Collins
    Dec. 21, 2005

    While Kerry may have conceded the election at 2:14 p.m., Nov. 3, a large portion of the population failed to accept the final results. They knew something was wrong.
    As one Virginia activist said, “This is simply not possible, the national results or here in Virginia.”

    Captured truth—the four National Exit Polls

    Just as Election Day 2004 was winding down, the server at Edison – Mitofsky (EM) crashed. EM was the firm conducting the National and State Exit Polls for a media consortium consisting of the four major networks, CNN, the Washington Post and other major media concerns. In an historical article, “Scoop” Independent Media outlined the process that allowed Jonathan Simon of VerifiedVoting.Org to capture elements of the National Exit Polls that were never intended for public consumption. Between 11 p.m. election night and 1:33 a.m. November 3, 2004, EM’s servers were out and so was a major portion of the truth.

    Using the national and state exit polls as a basis, TruthIsAll began a detailed analysis of the exit polls that demonstrated again and again the extremely high odds that Bush could have won the popular or electoral vote without a 24 hour suspension of the laws of mathematics and statistics.

  2. All fine and well…however, there’s also a mountain of evidence and unsubstantiated implausibilities as to the “official” version of the crimes of 9/11. To me, that’s the HUGE scandal that needs to be addressed, because everything else is subsequent of that, resides underneath that umbrella. So by ignoring that, it almost seems – in a sense – that digging in to fight the other dilemma’s is just a stroke job that is ignoring the true bullseye that could bring our fascist government down.

    The point being, it’s the media. Change, or potential to bring about change, lie in media control. Until truth seekers can find a way to access the populace in mass by way of widely distributed periodicals, and especially via the boob tube, there remains just a small percentage of us who ‘know’ what everyone should and needs to.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *